Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 24 (click to see context) from:
* When Django first arrives to Candieland and sets at the bar, you may notice the house slave sitting at the bar immediately takes her drink and moves across the room. If you remember Django's earlier words; there's nothing lower than a ''black'' slaver.
to:
* When Django first arrives to Candieland and sets at the bar, you may notice the house slave sitting at the bar immediately takes her drink and moves across the room. If you remember Django's earlier words; there's nothing lower than a ''black'' slaver.\
* Django's status as TheQuietOne makes sense when you consider that even as free man, white southerns still view him with contempt due to his race. The only person he speaks to on equal terms throughout the movie is Schultz.
* Django's status as TheQuietOne makes sense when you consider that even as free man, white southerns still view him with contempt due to his race. The only person he speaks to on equal terms throughout the movie is Schultz.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 24 (click to see context) from:
** When Django first arrives to Candieland and sets at the bar, you may notice the house slave sitting at the bar immediately takes her drink and moves across the room. If you remember Django's earlier words; there's nothing lower than a ''black'' slaver.
to:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** When Django first arrives to Candieland and sets at the bar, you may notice the house slave sitting at the bar immediately takes her drink and moves across the room. If you remember Django's earlier words; there's nothing lower than a ''black'' slaver.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
*** Not necessarily. The implication of Stephen's exposition about the mine is that he, being Candie's [[TheDragon Dragon]], was the one who ''really'' got Django sold.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
!!Fridge Brilliance
Deleted line(s) 10 (click to see context) :
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* What are two Australians doing in the Antebellum Deep South? One of the first large immigrations of Australians to the US were miners who came to America for the California Gold Rush. Those two were probably former gold miners who moved on after the gold was all mined.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* Recall Schultz's story about Broomhilda: the king locks her up, puts her around a dragon, and so Sigfried comes and kills the dragon and rescues her. Pay attention: Sigfried ''does NOT kill'' the king. He kills ''the dragon.''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 11 (click to see context) from:
* Many people were unsettled by the fact that [[spoiler:Django kills Lara Candie-Fitzwilly, a character who didn't like to see the violence of slavery]]. However, her death is debatably more important than any of the deaths in the film. Like her, there were many white men and women uncomfortable by the whole institution but rather than do anything to change the system, they just ignored the violence around them. By killing her, Tarantino is showing that these types of people, while they may not be as villainous as the slave owners, are just as guilty for allowing slavery to occur with their silence and enjoying the benefits of the subjugation of an entire race. Passively ''allowing'' those horrors to occur is just as morally culpable as actively causing them, a belief that Tarantino also brings up in ''Film/InglouriousBasterds'' with Shoshanna's Theatre Gambit.
to:
* Many people were unsettled by the fact that [[spoiler:Django kills Lara Candie-Fitzwilly, a character who didn't like to see the violence of slavery]]. However, her death is debatably more important than any of the deaths in the film. Like her, there were many white men and women uncomfortable by the whole institution but rather than do anything to change the system, they just ignored the violence around them. By killing her, Tarantino is showing that these types of people, while they may not be as villainous as the slave owners, are just as guilty for allowing slavery to occur with their silence and enjoying the benefits of the subjugation of an entire race. Passively Knowing that such horrors occur and passively ''allowing'' those horrors them to occur go on is just as morally culpable as actively causing ''causing'' them, a belief that Tarantino also brings up in ''Film/InglouriousBasterds'' with Shoshanna's Theatre Gambit.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* Upon finding out that Schultz and Django have been putting on a facade, Calvin gives a lesson on the biology of slaves as a way of saying "so you thought you could outsmart me, but you couldn't, 'cause I'm white." Of course, who was it that actually figured out they were being lied to? Stephen, a slave.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
I just realized it
Changed line(s) 19 (click to see context) from:
* Schultz telling Django to keep the bounty note in his pocket [[spoiler: came in handy later.]]
to:
* Schultz telling Django to keep the bounty note in his pocket [[spoiler: came in handy later.]]]]
!!Fridge Horror
*When they come across the slave in the tree who tried to run away, as Candie steps from the carriage you can see he is stepping onto fresh soil, probably turned over,as if it were dug up for a grave. You also notice another one not too far from the one he is stepping on, and later when Django is chained Stephen lists all of the things they`ve done to other slaves one can only wonder what happened to the two people whom we know are in the ground.
!!Fridge Horror
*When they come across the slave in the tree who tried to run away, as Candie steps from the carriage you can see he is stepping onto fresh soil, probably turned over,as if it were dug up for a grave. You also notice another one not too far from the one he is stepping on, and later when Django is chained Stephen lists all of the things they`ve done to other slaves one can only wonder what happened to the two people whom we know are in the ground.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 11 (click to see context) from:
* Many people were unsettled by the fact that [[spoiler:Django kills Lara Candie, a character who didn't like to see the violence of slavery]]. However, her death is debatably more important than any of the deaths in the film. Like her, there were many white men and women uncomfortable by the whole institution but rather than do anything to change the system, they just ignored the violence around them. By killing her, Tarantino is showing that these types of people, while they may not be as villainous as the slave owners, are just as guilty for allowing slavery to occur with their silence and enjoying the benefits of the subjugation of an entire race. Passively allowing horrors to occur is just as bad as actively causing those horrors, a belief that Tarantino also brings up in ''Film/InglouriousBasterds'' with Shoshanna's Theatre Gambit.
to:
* Many people were unsettled by the fact that [[spoiler:Django kills Lara Candie, Candie-Fitzwilly, a character who didn't like to see the violence of slavery]]. However, her death is debatably more important than any of the deaths in the film. Like her, there were many white men and women uncomfortable by the whole institution but rather than do anything to change the system, they just ignored the violence around them. By killing her, Tarantino is showing that these types of people, while they may not be as villainous as the slave owners, are just as guilty for allowing slavery to occur with their silence and enjoying the benefits of the subjugation of an entire race. Passively allowing ''allowing'' those horrors to occur is just as bad morally culpable as actively causing those horrors, them, a belief that Tarantino also brings up in ''Film/InglouriousBasterds'' with Shoshanna's Theatre Gambit.
Changed line(s) 13,14 (click to see context) from:
* More cynical viewers will note that Lara Lee doesn't snap immediately when Calvin shows off Broomhilda's whipped back at the dining table. She does when Calvin goes on one of his "dude, blacks are totally made for slavery" tirades, noting that Hildy has just been whipped 5 times and is back working like "nothing" while "if Lara got just one she'd go mad!". Lara is okay with slaves getting whipped, might (debtably) be okay with showing their scarred backs at the dinner table, but she is angry when Calvin puts her [[DudeWhereIsMyRespect on the same situation as a slave]], even if only hypothetically.
* Laura playing Fur Elise- the most recognisable piece of romantic idealist advocating for national and personal freedom played in house of slave owners. It seems that Candie siblings follow trends and like to play educated, but never wonders about interpretation.
* Laura playing Fur Elise- the most recognisable piece of romantic idealist advocating for national and personal freedom played in house of slave owners. It seems that Candie siblings follow trends and like to play educated, but never wonders about interpretation.
to:
* Laura playing
Changed line(s) 16 (click to see context) from:
* The moment where [[spoiler: Schultz shoots Candie]] is actually the first time in the entire film any of the primary characters breaks the law. Sure, Schultz's method of acquiring Django was legally iffy, but he was very careful to observe the forms of the law, and they did some lying and deceiving to their own ends, but there's not really any crime you could pin on them. All of their killings were legally protected. Whereas Candie and company, despite all the brutality, threats torture and murder never did anything illegal, because everyone he killed or mistreated were his slaves. Every time lawmen are present, they have no grounds to do anything about anything. It's a brilliant commentary on how utterly twisted the laws of this time and place were. These characters, both heroes and villains are as violent and immoral as in any Tarantino film, but in this context, even the worst bad guy is an upstanding citizen.
to:
* The moment where [[spoiler: Schultz shoots Candie]] is actually the first time in the entire film any of the primary characters breaks the law. Sure, Schultz's method of acquiring Django was legally iffy, but he was very careful to observe the forms of the law, and they did some lying and deceiving to their own ends, but there's not really any crime you could pin on them. All of their killings were legally protected. Whereas Candie and company, Calvin, despite all the brutality, threats torture threats, torture, and murder never murder, ''never did anything illegal, illegal'', because everyone he killed or mistreated were was his slaves.legal property. Every time lawmen are present, they have no grounds to do anything about anything. It's a brilliant commentary on how utterly twisted the laws of this time and place were. These characters, both heroes and villains alike, are as violent and immoral as in any Tarantino film, but in this context, even the worst bad guy is ''technically'' an upstanding citizen.
Changed line(s) 18,19 (click to see context) from:
* If the theory that Stephen was only playing dumb in the presence of others is true, then there's a moment where Dr. Shultz says the word 'panache' and Stephen acts all confused to which where it's made evident that Calvin didn't get it either if you watch his expression and how he fields the reply so as not to look like he doesn't know the definition. It's almost as though Stephen got all over-the-top befuddled for Calvin's benefit.
* Schutlz telling Django to keep the bounty note in his pocket [[spoiler: came in handy later.]]
* Schutlz telling Django to keep the bounty note in his pocket [[spoiler: came in handy later.]]
to:
* If the theory that Stephen was only playing dumb in the presence of others is true, then there's a consider the moment where Dr. Shultz Schultz says the word 'panache' and Stephen acts all confused to which where -- it's made also evident that Calvin didn't get it either if you watch either, judging by his expression and how he fields the reply so as not to look like he doesn't know the definition. It's almost as though Stephen got all over-the-top befuddled for Calvin's benefit.
*Schutlz Schultz telling Django to keep the bounty note in his pocket [[spoiler: came in handy later.]]
*
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* Upon being assured that Django can point out the Brittle brothers and with the intention of procuring him, Dr. Schultz exclaims "Sold American!" which is a fairly common expression used at auctions and the like when an agreed price is reached, but it takes on a funny ([[BlackComedy if dark]]) double meaning when you realize that Django is a "Sold American" as well.
to:
* Upon being assured that Django can point out the Brittle brothers and with the intention of procuring him, Dr. Schultz exclaims "Sold "Sold, American!" which is a fairly common expression used comes down from being commonly heard at late-19th-century tobacco auctions and the like when an agreed price is reached, (the American Tobacco Company was a major buyer in those days), but it takes on a funny ([[BlackComedy if dark]]) double meaning when you realize that Django is a "Sold "sold American" as well.well.
** Also notable for being an (intentional?) anachronism. The American Tobacco Company wasn't founded until 1891, and only one of its constituent sub-companies existed before the Civil War.
** Also notable for being an (intentional?) anachronism. The American Tobacco Company wasn't founded until 1891, and only one of its constituent sub-companies existed before the Civil War.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 17 (click to see context) from:
* If the theory that Stephen was only playing dumb in the presence of others is true, then there's a moment where Dr. Shultz says the word 'panache' and Stephen acts all confused to which where it's made evident that Calvin didn't get it either if you watch his expression and how he fields the reply so as not to look like he doesn't know the definition. It's almost as though Stephen got all over-the-top befuddled for Calvin's benefit.
to:
* If the theory that Stephen was only playing dumb in the presence of others is true, then there's a moment where Dr. Shultz says the word 'panache' and Stephen acts all confused to which where it's made evident that Calvin didn't get it either if you watch his expression and how he fields the reply so as not to look like he doesn't know the definition. It's almost as though Stephen got all over-the-top befuddled for Calvin's benefit.benefit.
* Schutlz telling Django to keep the bounty note in his pocket [[spoiler: came in handy later.]]
* Schutlz telling Django to keep the bounty note in his pocket [[spoiler: came in handy later.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
additional info
Changed line(s) 17 (click to see context) from:
* If the theory that Stephen was only playing dumb in the presence of others is true, then there's a moment where Dr. Shultz says the word 'panache' and Stephen acts all confused to which where it's made evident that Calvin didn't get it either if you watch his expression and how he fields the reply so as not to look like he doesn't know the definition.
to:
* If the theory that Stephen was only playing dumb in the presence of others is true, then there's a moment where Dr. Shultz says the word 'panache' and Stephen acts all confused to which where it's made evident that Calvin didn't get it either if you watch his expression and how he fields the reply so as not to look like he doesn't know the definition. It's almost as though Stephen got all over-the-top befuddled for Calvin's benefit.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
additional info
Changed line(s) 16 (click to see context) from:
* That Mandingo fighter who [[spoiler: get killed by dogs]] ran away after 3 fights. Candie was giving him his last two fights...
to:
* That Mandingo fighter who [[spoiler: get killed by dogs]] ran away after 3 fights. Candie was giving him his last two fights...fights...
* If the theory that Stephen was only playing dumb in the presence of others is true, then there's a moment where Dr. Shultz says the word 'panache' and Stephen acts all confused to which where it's made evident that Calvin didn't get it either if you watch his expression and how he fields the reply so as not to look like he doesn't know the definition.
* If the theory that Stephen was only playing dumb in the presence of others is true, then there's a moment where Dr. Shultz says the word 'panache' and Stephen acts all confused to which where it's made evident that Calvin didn't get it either if you watch his expression and how he fields the reply so as not to look like he doesn't know the definition.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 15 (click to see context) from:
* The moment where [[spoiler: Schultz shoots Candie]] is actually the first time in the entire film any of the primary characters breaks the law. Sure, Schultz's method of acquiring Django was legally iffy, but he was very careful to observe the forms of the law, and they did some lying and deceiving to their own ends, but there's not really any crime you could pin on them. All of their killings were legally protected. Whereas Candie and company, despite all the brutality, threats torture and murder never did anything illegal, because everyone he killed or mistreated were his slaves. Every time lawmen are present, they have no grounds to do anything about anything. It's a brilliant commentary on how utterly twisted the laws of this time and place were. These characters, both heroes and villains are as violent and immoral as in any Tarantino film, but in this context, even the worst bad guy is an upstanding citizen.
to:
* The moment where [[spoiler: Schultz shoots Candie]] is actually the first time in the entire film any of the primary characters breaks the law. Sure, Schultz's method of acquiring Django was legally iffy, but he was very careful to observe the forms of the law, and they did some lying and deceiving to their own ends, but there's not really any crime you could pin on them. All of their killings were legally protected. Whereas Candie and company, despite all the brutality, threats torture and murder never did anything illegal, because everyone he killed or mistreated were his slaves. Every time lawmen are present, they have no grounds to do anything about anything. It's a brilliant commentary on how utterly twisted the laws of this time and place were. These characters, both heroes and villains are as violent and immoral as in any Tarantino film, but in this context, even the worst bad guy is an upstanding citizen.citizen.
* That Mandingo fighter who [[spoiler: get killed by dogs]] ran away after 3 fights. Candie was giving him his last two fights...
* That Mandingo fighter who [[spoiler: get killed by dogs]] ran away after 3 fights. Candie was giving him his last two fights...
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 15 (click to see context) from:
* The moment where [[spoiler: Shulz shoots Candie]] is actually the first time in the entire film any of the primary characters breaks the law. Sure, Shulz's method of acquiring Django was legally iffy, but he was very careful to observe the forms of the law, and they did some lying and deceiving to their own ends, but there's not really any crime you could pin on them. All of their killings were legally protected. Whereas Candie and company, despite all the brutality, threats torture and murder never did anything illegal, because everyone he killed or mistreated were his slaves. Every time lawmen are present, they have no grounds to do anything about anything. It's a brilliant commentary on how utterly twisted the laws of this time and place were. These characters, both heroes and villains are as violent and immoral as in any Tarantino film, but in this context, even the worst bad guy is an upstanding citizen.
to:
* The moment where [[spoiler: Shulz Schultz shoots Candie]] is actually the first time in the entire film any of the primary characters breaks the law. Sure, Shulz's Schultz's method of acquiring Django was legally iffy, but he was very careful to observe the forms of the law, and they did some lying and deceiving to their own ends, but there's not really any crime you could pin on them. All of their killings were legally protected. Whereas Candie and company, despite all the brutality, threats torture and murder never did anything illegal, because everyone he killed or mistreated were his slaves. Every time lawmen are present, they have no grounds to do anything about anything. It's a brilliant commentary on how utterly twisted the laws of this time and place were. These characters, both heroes and villains are as violent and immoral as in any Tarantino film, but in this context, even the worst bad guy is an upstanding citizen.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 14 (click to see context) from:
* [[spoiler: The punishment Stephen has in store for Django is to rob him not only of his freedom, but his identity, his place in the world and his voice. For a man like Django, who has fought for so long for these things, this is truly AFateWorseThanDeath.]]
to:
* [[spoiler: The punishment Stephen has in store for Django is to rob him not only of his freedom, but his identity, his place in the world and his voice. For a man like Django, who has fought for so long for these things, this is truly AFateWorseThanDeath.]]]]
* The moment where [[spoiler: Shulz shoots Candie]] is actually the first time in the entire film any of the primary characters breaks the law. Sure, Shulz's method of acquiring Django was legally iffy, but he was very careful to observe the forms of the law, and they did some lying and deceiving to their own ends, but there's not really any crime you could pin on them. All of their killings were legally protected. Whereas Candie and company, despite all the brutality, threats torture and murder never did anything illegal, because everyone he killed or mistreated were his slaves. Every time lawmen are present, they have no grounds to do anything about anything. It's a brilliant commentary on how utterly twisted the laws of this time and place were. These characters, both heroes and villains are as violent and immoral as in any Tarantino film, but in this context, even the worst bad guy is an upstanding citizen.
* The moment where [[spoiler: Shulz shoots Candie]] is actually the first time in the entire film any of the primary characters breaks the law. Sure, Shulz's method of acquiring Django was legally iffy, but he was very careful to observe the forms of the law, and they did some lying and deceiving to their own ends, but there's not really any crime you could pin on them. All of their killings were legally protected. Whereas Candie and company, despite all the brutality, threats torture and murder never did anything illegal, because everyone he killed or mistreated were his slaves. Every time lawmen are present, they have no grounds to do anything about anything. It's a brilliant commentary on how utterly twisted the laws of this time and place were. These characters, both heroes and villains are as violent and immoral as in any Tarantino film, but in this context, even the worst bad guy is an upstanding citizen.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** And [[spoiler: he'd be filled with cavities because of Candie]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 12 (click to see context) from:
* Laura playing Fur Elise- the most recognisable piece of romantic idealist advocating for national and personal freedom played in house of slave owners. It seems that Candie siblings follow trends and like to play educated, but never wonders about interpretation.
to:
* Laura playing Fur Elise- the most recognisable piece of romantic idealist advocating for national and personal freedom played in house of slave owners. It seems that Candie siblings follow trends and like to play educated, but never wonders about interpretation.interpretation.
* [[spoiler: The punishment Stephen has in store for Django is to rob him not only of his freedom, but his identity, his place in the world and his voice. For a man like Django, who has fought for so long for these things, this is truly AFateWorseThanDeath.]]
* [[spoiler: The punishment Stephen has in store for Django is to rob him not only of his freedom, but his identity, his place in the world and his voice. For a man like Django, who has fought for so long for these things, this is truly AFateWorseThanDeath.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** Speaking of Stephen, "Black slaver's even lower than the head house nigger, and that's ''pretty fucking low''.", and just what is Stephen?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 9 (click to see context) from:
* More cynical viewers will note that Lara Lee doesn't snap immediately when Calvin shows off Broomhilda's whipped back at the dining table. She does when Calvin goes on one of his "dude, blacks are totally made for slavery" tirades, noting that Hildy has just been whipped 5 times and is back working like "nothing" while "if Lara got just one she'd go mad!". Lara is okay with slaves getting whipped, might (debtably) be okay with showing their scarred backs at the dinner table, but she is angry when Calvin puts her [[DudeWhereIsMyRespect on the same situation as a slave]], even if only hypothetically.
to:
* More cynical viewers will note that Lara Lee doesn't snap immediately when Calvin shows off Broomhilda's whipped back at the dining table. She does when Calvin goes on one of his "dude, blacks are totally made for slavery" tirades, noting that Hildy has just been whipped 5 times and is back working like "nothing" while "if Lara got just one she'd go mad!". Lara is okay with slaves getting whipped, might (debtably) be okay with showing their scarred backs at the dinner table, but she is angry when Calvin puts her [[DudeWhereIsMyRespect on the same situation as a slave]], even if only hypothetically.hypothetically.
* Laura playing Fur Elise- the most recognisable piece of romantic idealist advocating for national and personal freedom played in house of slave owners. It seems that Candie siblings follow trends and like to play educated, but never wonders about interpretation.
* Laura playing Fur Elise- the most recognisable piece of romantic idealist advocating for national and personal freedom played in house of slave owners. It seems that Candie siblings follow trends and like to play educated, but never wonders about interpretation.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 8 (click to see context) from:
** Not to mention that she's the one that [[spoiler: sells Django to the mine]] near the end of the film, making her directly involved in the trade ''and'' harming the main character.
to:
** Not to mention that she's the one that [[spoiler: sells Django to the mine]] near the end of the film, making her directly involved in the trade ''and'' harming the main character.character.
* More cynical viewers will note that Lara Lee doesn't snap immediately when Calvin shows off Broomhilda's whipped back at the dining table. She does when Calvin goes on one of his "dude, blacks are totally made for slavery" tirades, noting that Hildy has just been whipped 5 times and is back working like "nothing" while "if Lara got just one she'd go mad!". Lara is okay with slaves getting whipped, might (debtably) be okay with showing their scarred backs at the dinner table, but she is angry when Calvin puts her [[DudeWhereIsMyRespect on the same situation as a slave]], even if only hypothetically.
* More cynical viewers will note that Lara Lee doesn't snap immediately when Calvin shows off Broomhilda's whipped back at the dining table. She does when Calvin goes on one of his "dude, blacks are totally made for slavery" tirades, noting that Hildy has just been whipped 5 times and is back working like "nothing" while "if Lara got just one she'd go mad!". Lara is okay with slaves getting whipped, might (debtably) be okay with showing their scarred backs at the dinner table, but she is angry when Calvin puts her [[DudeWhereIsMyRespect on the same situation as a slave]], even if only hypothetically.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 8,9 (click to see context) from:
** Not to mention that she's the one that [[spoiler: sells Django to the mine]] near the end of the film, making her directly involved in the trade ''and'' harming the main character.
* Who strives to liberate African-Americans from their struggle and the racism inherent in society? A man known as Dr. King.
* Who strives to liberate African-Americans from their struggle and the racism inherent in society? A man known as Dr. King.
to:
** Not to mention that she's the one that [[spoiler: sells Django to the mine]] near the end of the film, making her directly involved in the trade ''and'' harming the main character.
* Who strives to liberate African-Americans from their struggle and the racism inherent in society? A man known as Dr. King.character.
* Who strives to liberate African-Americans from their struggle and the racism inherent in society? A man known as Dr. King.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** It also serves as a ChekovsGun for Django's [[spoiler: escape and]] comeback in the finale.
Added DiffLines:
** Not to mention that she's the one that [[spoiler: sells Django to the mine]] near the end of the film, making her directly involved in the trade ''and'' harming the main character.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 6 (click to see context) from:
* Many people were unsettled by the fact that [[spoiler:Django kills Lara Candie, a character who didn't like to see the violence of slavery]]. However, her death is debatably more important than any of the deaths in the film. Like her, there were many white men and women uncomfortable by the whole institution but rather than do anything to change the system, they just ignored the violence around them. By killing her, Tarantino is showing that these types of people, while they may not be as villainous as the slave owners, are just as guilty for allowing slavery to occur with their silence and enjoying the benefits of the subjugation of an entire race. Passively allowing horrors to occur is just as bad as actively causing those horrors, a belief that Tarantino also brings up in ''Film/InglouriousBasterds'' with Shoshanna's Theatre Gambit.
to:
* Many people were unsettled by the fact that [[spoiler:Django kills Lara Candie, a character who didn't like to see the violence of slavery]]. However, her death is debatably more important than any of the deaths in the film. Like her, there were many white men and women uncomfortable by the whole institution but rather than do anything to change the system, they just ignored the violence around them. By killing her, Tarantino is showing that these types of people, while they may not be as villainous as the slave owners, are just as guilty for allowing slavery to occur with their silence and enjoying the benefits of the subjugation of an entire race. Passively allowing horrors to occur is just as bad as actively causing those horrors, a belief that Tarantino also brings up in ''Film/InglouriousBasterds'' with Shoshanna's Theatre Gambit.Gambit.
* Who strives to liberate African-Americans from their struggle and the racism inherent in society? A man known as Dr. King.
* Who strives to liberate African-Americans from their struggle and the racism inherent in society? A man known as Dr. King.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
* Right before the humourous exchange about not being able to see through the proto-KKK masks, you see one of the riders fall off his horse to emphasize that you indeed "can't see shit while the horse is moving" .
to:
* Right before the humourous exchange about not being able to see through the proto-KKK masks, you see one of the riders fall off his horse to emphasize that you indeed "can't see shit while the horse is moving" .moving" .
* The bad guy in this film is named Candie. Dr. Schultz is a (former) dentist. Of course [[spoiler:he'd kill Candie.]]
* At first the scene at the end of the winter montage where Dr. Schultz and Django meet a marshal friend of theirs felt out of place. But after the Candieland sequence it makes sense. The marshal offers them cake, which they accept. At Candieland, there's constant mention of dessert (a cake), that Candie goes on and on about. When it finally appears, Dr. Schultz refuses it. Why? He likes cake, but he's absolutely disgusted by Candie.
* Stephen very likely [[spoiler: faked his limp ages ago to be moved into the house to avoid field work, and worked his way up to head house slave from there.]]
* Many people were unsettled by the fact that [[spoiler:Django kills Lara Candie, a character who didn't like to see the violence of slavery]]. However, her death is debatably more important than any of the deaths in the film. Like her, there were many white men and women uncomfortable by the whole institution but rather than do anything to change the system, they just ignored the violence around them. By killing her, Tarantino is showing that these types of people, while they may not be as villainous as the slave owners, are just as guilty for allowing slavery to occur with their silence and enjoying the benefits of the subjugation of an entire race. Passively allowing horrors to occur is just as bad as actively causing those horrors, a belief that Tarantino also brings up in ''Film/InglouriousBasterds'' with Shoshanna's Theatre Gambit.
* The bad guy in this film is named Candie. Dr. Schultz is a (former) dentist. Of course [[spoiler:he'd kill Candie.]]
* At first the scene at the end of the winter montage where Dr. Schultz and Django meet a marshal friend of theirs felt out of place. But after the Candieland sequence it makes sense. The marshal offers them cake, which they accept. At Candieland, there's constant mention of dessert (a cake), that Candie goes on and on about. When it finally appears, Dr. Schultz refuses it. Why? He likes cake, but he's absolutely disgusted by Candie.
* Stephen very likely [[spoiler: faked his limp ages ago to be moved into the house to avoid field work, and worked his way up to head house slave from there.]]
* Many people were unsettled by the fact that [[spoiler:Django kills Lara Candie, a character who didn't like to see the violence of slavery]]. However, her death is debatably more important than any of the deaths in the film. Like her, there were many white men and women uncomfortable by the whole institution but rather than do anything to change the system, they just ignored the violence around them. By killing her, Tarantino is showing that these types of people, while they may not be as villainous as the slave owners, are just as guilty for allowing slavery to occur with their silence and enjoying the benefits of the subjugation of an entire race. Passively allowing horrors to occur is just as bad as actively causing those horrors, a belief that Tarantino also brings up in ''Film/InglouriousBasterds'' with Shoshanna's Theatre Gambit.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* Upon being assured that Django can point out the Brittle brothers and with the intention of procuring him, Dr. Schultz exclaims "Sold American!" which is a fairly common expression used at auctions and the like when an agreed price is reached, but it takes on a funny ([[BlackComedy if dark]]) double meaning when you realize that Django is a "Sold American" as well.
to:
* Upon being assured that Django can point out the Brittle brothers and with the intention of procuring him, Dr. Schultz exclaims "Sold American!" which is a fairly common expression used at auctions and the like when an agreed price is reached, but it takes on a funny ([[BlackComedy if dark]]) double meaning when you realize that Django is a "Sold American" as well.well.
* Right before the humourous exchange about not being able to see through the proto-KKK masks, you see one of the riders fall off his horse to emphasize that you indeed "can't see shit while the horse is moving" .
* Right before the humourous exchange about not being able to see through the proto-KKK masks, you see one of the riders fall off his horse to emphasize that you indeed "can't see shit while the horse is moving" .
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* Upon being assured that Django can point out the Brittle brothers and with the intention of procuring him, Dr. Schultz exclaims "Sold American!" which is a fairly common expression used at auctions and the like when an agreed price is reached, but it takes on a funny ([[BlackComedy if dark]]) double meaning when you realize that Django is a "Sold American" as well.
