Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Film / TheDayAfterTomorrow

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** The notorious “super-freeze” scene, where New York City is caught in the eye of the storm and frozen solid, is impossible for a number of reasons. The eye of a hurricane is where the storm’s low pressure center is found, and so the air there should actually be ''rising'' and not falling. Also, the lowest temperature in the upper reaches of the troposphere is only -60°F (-51°C), far greater than the -150°F (-101°C) given in the movie. The temperature at which the flash-freezing effect occurs in the film is lower than anything ever recorded on Earth.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Though many of the events depicted in the movie are indeed possible ''to some extent,'' the speed and intensity at which they occur has been greatly exaggerated for entertainment value.

to:

** Though many of the events depicted in the movie [[https://www.forbes.com/sites/ericmack/2018/04/11/the-climate-change-atlantic-gulf-stream-science-behind-the-day-after-tomorrow-is-coming-true/amp/ are indeed possible ''to some extent,'' possible]], the speed and intensity at which they occur has been greatly exaggerated for entertainment value.value, taking something that would occur over decades and centuries and having it happen within ''several days'' instead.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Though many of the events depicted in the movie are indeed possible ''to some extent,'' the speed and intensity at which they occur has been greatly exaggerated for entertainment value.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* HollywoodScience: Known for being one of the [[https://www.yahoo.com/amphtml/entertainment/top-10-scientifically-inaccurate-movies-slideshow-903?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvLnVrLw&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAADH_J4syoHIsmmPWiy7ACkt4Qh0rEwFVJkryXLL9_wVQ-akLBKrsBOgSlqRFslweDbOd0m_5RCrzEHGRlgbG1OBPVs42WvHEd5kP22dsGSOEO-iLrEBKDD9ujAozQ_1igMz9oZQZ9nJt5kLPpex4Y5M-oVJcfjB_9ZOvGX-vbYDs least scientifically-accurate movies of all time]], ''The Day After Tomorrow'' takes Hollywood Science to the extreme with its overblown and hyper-accelerated climate change scenario. Though it isn’t nearly as ridiculous as ''Film/TheCore,'' numerous real-life climate scientists have taken the film to task for its countless scientific inaccuracies while also praising it for being one of the first blockbusters to ''attempt'' to tackle the issue.

to:

* HollywoodScience: Known for being one of the [[https://www.yahoo.com/amphtml/entertainment/top-10-scientifically-inaccurate-movies-slideshow-903?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvLnVrLw&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAADH_J4syoHIsmmPWiy7ACkt4Qh0rEwFVJkryXLL9_wVQ-akLBKrsBOgSlqRFslweDbOd0m_5RCrzEHGRlgbG1OBPVs42WvHEd5kP22dsGSOEO-iLrEBKDD9ujAozQ_1igMz9oZQZ9nJt5kLPpex4Y5M-oVJcfjB_9ZOvGX-vbYDs least scientifically-accurate movies of all time]], ''The Day After Tomorrow'' takes Hollywood Science to the extreme with its overblown and hyper-accelerated climate change scenario. Though it isn’t nearly as ridiculous as ''Film/TheCore,'' numerous real-life climate scientists have taken the film to task for its countless scientific inaccuracies inaccuracies, while also begrudgingly praising it for being one of the first blockbusters to even ''attempt'' to tackle the issue.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* HollywoodScience: Known for being one of the [[https://www.yahoo.com/amphtml/entertainment/top-10-scientifically-inaccurate-movies-slideshow-903?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvLnVrLw&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAADH_J4syoHIsmmPWiy7ACkt4Qh0rEwFVJkryXLL9_wVQ-akLBKrsBOgSlqRFslweDbOd0m_5RCrzEHGRlgbG1OBPVs42WvHEd5kP22dsGSOEO-iLrEBKDD9ujAozQ_1igMz9oZQZ9nJt5kLPpex4Y5M-oVJcfjB_9ZOvGX-vbYDs least scientifically-accurate movies of all time]], ''The Day After Tomorrow'' takes Hollywood Science to the extreme with its overblown and hyper-accelerated climate change scenario. Though it isn’t nearly as ridiculous as ''Film/TheCore,'' numerous real-life climate scientists have taken the film to task for its countless scientific inaccuracies.

to:

* HollywoodScience: Known for being one of the [[https://www.yahoo.com/amphtml/entertainment/top-10-scientifically-inaccurate-movies-slideshow-903?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvLnVrLw&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAADH_J4syoHIsmmPWiy7ACkt4Qh0rEwFVJkryXLL9_wVQ-akLBKrsBOgSlqRFslweDbOd0m_5RCrzEHGRlgbG1OBPVs42WvHEd5kP22dsGSOEO-iLrEBKDD9ujAozQ_1igMz9oZQZ9nJt5kLPpex4Y5M-oVJcfjB_9ZOvGX-vbYDs least scientifically-accurate movies of all time]], ''The Day After Tomorrow'' takes Hollywood Science to the extreme with its overblown and hyper-accelerated climate change scenario. Though it isn’t nearly as ridiculous as ''Film/TheCore,'' numerous real-life climate scientists have taken the film to task for its countless scientific inaccuracies.inaccuracies while also praising it for being one of the first blockbusters to ''attempt'' to tackle the issue.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* HollywoodScience: Known for being one of the least scientifically-accurate movies of all time, ''The Day After Tomorrow'' takes Hollywood Science to the extreme with its overblown and hyper-accelerated climate change scenario.

to:

* HollywoodScience: Known for being one of the [[https://www.yahoo.com/amphtml/entertainment/top-10-scientifically-inaccurate-movies-slideshow-903?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvLnVrLw&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAADH_J4syoHIsmmPWiy7ACkt4Qh0rEwFVJkryXLL9_wVQ-akLBKrsBOgSlqRFslweDbOd0m_5RCrzEHGRlgbG1OBPVs42WvHEd5kP22dsGSOEO-iLrEBKDD9ujAozQ_1igMz9oZQZ9nJt5kLPpex4Y5M-oVJcfjB_9ZOvGX-vbYDs least scientifically-accurate movies of all time, time]], ''The Day After Tomorrow'' takes Hollywood Science to the extreme with its overblown and hyper-accelerated climate change scenario. Though it isn’t nearly as ridiculous as ''Film/TheCore,'' numerous real-life climate scientists have taken the film to task for its countless scientific inaccuracies.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Surprised this trope hasn’t been added tbh

Added DiffLines:

* HollywoodScience: Known for being one of the least scientifically-accurate movies of all time, ''The Day After Tomorrow'' takes Hollywood Science to the extreme with its overblown and hyper-accelerated climate change scenario.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** Creator/RolandEmmerich conceded that the wave would have easily toppled the Statue of Liberty, but chose to have it remain standing in order to illustrate “American values standing up to the forces.” Similarly, none of the buildings in Manhattan get destroyed by the storm surge as a sign of respect for the victims of 9/11, with Emmerich almost shelving the film and giving up on making disaster films entirely after such a [[https://screenrant.com/day-after-tomorrow-movie-disaster-buildings-destroy-no-why/amp/ tragic ''real-life disaster.]]''

to:

*** Creator/RolandEmmerich conceded that the wave would have easily toppled the Statue of Liberty, but chose to have it remain standing in order to illustrate “American values standing up to the forces.” Similarly, none of the buildings in Manhattan get destroyed by the storm surge as a sign of respect for the victims of 9/11, with Emmerich almost shelving the film and giving up on making disaster films entirely after such a [[https://screenrant.tragic ''[[https://screenrant.com/day-after-tomorrow-movie-disaster-buildings-destroy-no-why/amp/ tragic ''real-life real-life disaster.]]''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** Creator/RolandEmmerich conceded that the wave would have easily toppled the Statue of Liberty, but chose to have it remain standing in order to illustrate “American values standing up to the forces.” Similarly, none of the buildings in Manhattan get destroyed by the storm surge as a sign of respect for the victims of 9/11, with Emmerich almost shelving the film and giving up on making disaster films entirely after such a [[https://screenrant.com/day-after-tomorrow-movie-disaster-buildings-destroy-no-why/amp/ tragic ''real-life disaster.'']]

to:

*** Creator/RolandEmmerich conceded that the wave would have easily toppled the Statue of Liberty, but chose to have it remain standing in order to illustrate “American values standing up to the forces.” Similarly, none of the buildings in Manhattan get destroyed by the storm surge as a sign of respect for the victims of 9/11, with Emmerich almost shelving the film and giving up on making disaster films entirely after such a [[https://screenrant.com/day-after-tomorrow-movie-disaster-buildings-destroy-no-why/amp/ tragic ''real-life disaster.'']]]]''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Added link


*** Creator/RolandEmmerich conceded that the wave would have easily toppled the Statue of Liberty, but chose to have it remain standing in order to illustrate “American values standing up to the forces.” Similarly, none of the buildings in Manhattan are destroyed by the storm surge out of respect for the victims of 9/11, with Emmerich almost shelving the film and giving up on making disaster films entirely after such a tragic ''real-life disaster.''

to:

*** Creator/RolandEmmerich conceded that the wave would have easily toppled the Statue of Liberty, but chose to have it remain standing in order to illustrate “American values standing up to the forces.” Similarly, none of the buildings in Manhattan are get destroyed by the storm surge out as a sign of respect for the victims of 9/11, with Emmerich almost shelving the film and giving up on making disaster films entirely after such a [[https://screenrant.com/day-after-tomorrow-movie-disaster-buildings-destroy-no-why/amp/ tragic ''real-life disaster.'''']]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** Creator/RolandEmmerich conceded that the wave would have easily toppled the Statue of Liberty, but chose to have it remain standing in order to illustrate “American values standing up to the forces.” Similarly, the reason why none of the buildings in Manhattan are destroyed by the storm surge is out of respect for the victims of 9/11, as Emmerich almost gave up on making disaster films after such a tragic ''real-life disaster.''

to:

*** Creator/RolandEmmerich conceded that the wave would have easily toppled the Statue of Liberty, but chose to have it remain standing in order to illustrate “American values standing up to the forces.” Similarly, the reason why none of the buildings in Manhattan are destroyed by the storm surge is out of respect for the victims of 9/11, as with Emmerich almost gave shelving the film and giving up on making disaster films entirely after such a tragic ''real-life disaster.''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

***Creator/RolandEmmerich conceded that the wave would have easily toppled the Statue of Liberty, but chose to have it remain standing in order to illustrate “American values standing up to the forces.” Similarly, the reason why none of the buildings in Manhattan are destroyed by the storm surge is out of respect for the victims of 9/11, as Emmerich almost gave up on making disaster films after such a tragic ''real-life disaster.''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* AllThereInTheScript: Many of the central supporting characters are never referred to by name at any point in the movie; these include...
** Luther: the street-savvy homeless man
** President Blake: the George W. Bush CaptainErsatz
** Judith: the head librarian
** Jeremy and Elsa: the bickering library pages
** Campbell: the cop who lead many New Yorkers, including himself, to their frozen demise
** Simon: the Hedland Centre scientist who was a new father (though his wife, who only had about one minute of screentime, was referred to by her name, Jeanette).
*** One interesting inversion of this is the Secretary of State, who not only never had her name addressed at any point in the movie, but was even listed in the credits as simple Secretary of State.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


----

to:

--------
->''"Look at that... Have you ever seen the air so clear?"''

Added: 550

Changed: 132

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ArtisticLicenseSports: Celtic are seen wearing blue shirts. As the main colour of their arch rivals Rangers, blue would never appear in any of their kits.

to:

* ArtisticLicenseSports: ArtisticLicenseSports:
**
Celtic are seen wearing blue shirts. As the main colour of their arch rivals Rangers, blue would never appear in any of their kits.kits.
** The television announcer states they are rejoining the match "63 minutes into the second half", which contains two errors:
*** Live coverage of matches do not contain commercial breaks during the action; these are saved for half-time and
*** Association football matches last 90 minutes, therefore meaning a half lasts 45 minutes. He should have said "63 minutes into the game" or "18 minutes into the second half".

Changed: 131

Removed: 503

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
The tv announcer mentions that it's a Champions League match, so that whole section is irrelevant.


* ArtisticLicenseSports:
** Celtic are seen wearing blue shirts. As the main colour of their arch rivals Rangers, blue would never appear in any of their kits.
** Manchester United and Glasgow Celtic do ''not'' play in the same league. The English and Scottish leagues are wholly separate things. The only way these teams would meet is if they were randomly drawn in a European football competition, or else if they agreed on a pre-season friendly. besides, that was also the wrong team strip for Man U. So - sack the researcher!

to:

* ArtisticLicenseSports:
**
ArtisticLicenseSports: Celtic are seen wearing blue shirts. As the main colour of their arch rivals Rangers, blue would never appear in any of their kits.
** Manchester United and Glasgow Celtic do ''not'' play in the same league. The English and Scottish leagues are wholly separate things. The only way these teams would meet is if they were randomly drawn in a European football competition, or else if they agreed on a pre-season friendly. besides, that was also the wrong team strip for Man U. So - sack the researcher!
kits.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

[[caption-width-right:300:''"[[Film/PlanetOfTheApes1968 You maniacs! You froze it stiff!]]"'']]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
TRS wick cleaning, fits no other tropes


* HollywoodNerd: Gyllenhaal's character is too good looking for a real nerd.

Changed: 184

Removed: 174

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


The film was made in Toronto and Montreal and is the highest-grossing Hollywood film to be made in Canada (if adjusted for inflation).

Also notable that the "science" used in the film is so inaccurate that [[https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0319262/trivia NASA refused to officially consult with the filmmakers.]]

to:

The film was made in Toronto and Montreal and is the highest-grossing Hollywood film to be made in Canada (if adjusted for inflation).

Also
inflation). It's also notable in that the "science" used in the film is so inaccurate that [[https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0319262/trivia NASA refused to officially consult with the filmmakers.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Repair Dont Respond (and you're both wrong, he actually says it was the first book ever *printed*)


* ArtisticLicenseHistory: The HollywoodAtheist character justifies his holding onto a Bible by saying that he values it for being “the first book”. While there is some debate about whether certain parts of scripture are among the oldest texts ever written, but the Bible was definitely not the first book ever written [[note]] What he actually said in the film was the Bible was the first book donated to that particular library[[/note]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
typos


* ArtisticLicensePhysics: Water is incompressable and has a density almost 800 times that of air. A "flood" the size and velocity of what is depicted hitting New York is called a "tsunami" and not only would have crushed the Statute of Liberty like a beer can but would have done the same to every building in its path, including the wall of the library and not just the ground floor windows.

to:

* ArtisticLicensePhysics: Water is incompressable and has a density almost 800 times that of air. A "flood" the size and velocity of what is depicted hitting New York is called a "tsunami" and not only would have crushed the Statute Statue of Liberty like a beer can but would have done the same to every building in its path, including the wall of the library and not just the ground floor windows.



* {{Foreshadowing}}: The mammoth at the museum is said to have frozen instantly while grazing. Three minutes later, an British pilot freezes instantly when opening the hatch of his crashed helicopter.

to:

* {{Foreshadowing}}: The mammoth at the museum is said to have frozen instantly while grazing. Three minutes later, an a British pilot freezes instantly when opening the hatch of his crashed helicopter.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Dewicked trope


* AdultFear: Having your child trapped in a city hit by a disaster. Also, being trapped in frozen Scotland, and [[spoiler: hoping that your wife and infant son made it to Spain in time to be with your mother-in-law]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ArtisticLicenseHistory: The HollywoodAtheist character justifies his holding onto a Bible by saying that he values it for being “the first book”. While there is some debate about whether certain parts of scripture are among the oldest texts ever written, but the Bible was definitely not the first book ever written.

to:

* ArtisticLicenseHistory: The HollywoodAtheist character justifies his holding onto a Bible by saying that he values it for being “the first book”. While there is some debate about whether certain parts of scripture are among the oldest texts ever written, but the Bible was definitely not the first book ever written.written [[note]] What he actually said in the film was the Bible was the first book donated to that particular library[[/note]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ShoutOut: LA's destruction is reported by newsie [[TheSimpsons Bart to anchor Lisa]].

to:

* ShoutOut: LA's destruction is reported by newsie [[TheSimpsons [[WesternAnimation/TheSimpsons Bart to anchor Lisa]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
At no point in the movie is any prize money mentioned


* ArtisticLicenseAwards: The U.S. Academic Decathlon would NEVER offer a ''$1 billion'' cash prize to the national winners. For comparison, that's about 1/16 of NASA's budget, and the highest jackpot in US history is just ''$656 million''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The IntimateHealing scene could be quite a bit more intimate/awkward. Sam should lose ''all'' of his clothes (keeping wet underwear on is a poor idea) and Laura, whose clothes are also soaked from the rainstorm and splashing around, should be mostly skin-to-skin. As depicted, this wastes a lot of body heat.

to:

** The IntimateHealing scene could be quite a bit more intimate/awkward. Sam should lose ''all'' of his clothes (keeping wet underwear on is a poor idea) and Laura, whose clothes are also soaked from the rainstorm and splashing around, should be mostly skin-to-skin. As depicted, this wastes a lot of body heat. But this is enforced partially by the fact that Emmy Rossum (Laura) was 16 when filming, so her being stripped down was off the table.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* TruthInTelevision: Using body heat to warm someone as Laura does with Sam is exactly what you're supposed to do when someone is suffering hypothermic shock and you're nowhere near a hospital setting. A pragmatic license is taken with this though, as it's supposed to be skin-to-skin, meaning Laura should have taken off all her clothes, but that wouldn't fly as Emmy Rossum was still a minor at the time she filmed.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Also, don't American scientists and universities use degrees Celcius to calculate temperature? This is a universal academic standard, even if the rest of the USA uses the archaic Fahrenheit system.

to:

** Also, don't American scientists and universities use degrees Celcius to calculate temperature? This is a universal academic standard, even if the rest of the USA uses the archaic Fahrenheit system.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ArtisticLicenseHistory: The HollywoodAtheist character justifies his holding onto a Bible by saying that he values it for being “the first book”. While there is some debate about whether certain parts of scripture are among the oldest texts ever written, but the Bible was definitely not the first book ever written.

Removed: 254

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* RedShirtReporter: Features a reporter giving up-to-the-minute reports on the tornadoes rampaging through downtown Los Angeles. He ends up flattened by flying debris at the exact moment that he looks at the camera instead of his surroundings, of course.

Top