Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Film / TheAristocrats

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* CruelAndUnusualDeath: The punch line to Martin Mull's version of the joke. Three religious missionaries run afoul of an aboriginal tribe and are given a choice of "Death" or "The Aristocrats". The first two choose The Aristocrats, which consists of the men of the tribe brutally violating them in every sexual way imaginable. The third guy, having witnessed the utter horror of The Aristocrats twice now opts for death. The chief says "very well, you shall be put to death... But first, The Aristocrats!"

to:

* CruelAndUnusualDeath: The punch line to Martin Mull's Creator/MartinMull's version of the joke. Three religious missionaries run afoul of an aboriginal tribe and are given a choice of "Death" or "The Aristocrats". The first two choose The Aristocrats, which consists of the men of the tribe brutally violating them in every sexual way imaginable. The third guy, having witnessed the utter horror of The Aristocrats twice now opts for death. The chief says "very well, you shall be put to death... But first, The Aristocrats!"
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* BewareTheNiceOnes: How many discovered that Creator/BobSaget ain't exactly a family friendly comedian despite his work on ''Series/FullHouse'' and ''Series/AmericasFunniestHomeVideos''.

to:

* BewareTheNiceOnes: How This movie is where many people discovered that Creator/BobSaget ain't exactly a family friendly comedian family-friendly comedian, despite his work on ''Series/FullHouse'' and ''Series/AmericasFunniestHomeVideos''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[quoteright:300:http://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/Aristocrats_6967.jpg]]

to:

[[quoteright:300:http://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/Aristocrats_6967.jpg]]
org/pmwiki/pub/images/the_artistocrats_2005_poster.jpg]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[quoteright:336:http://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/Aristocrats_6967.jpg]]

to:

[[quoteright:336:http://static.[[quoteright:300:http://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/Aristocrats_6967.jpg]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** In fairness, the unedited version of Saget's rendition of the joke is available on the internet and shows that he wasn't corpsing as much as he appeared to be; they just left in the corpsing because those are the funniest bits.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Added emphasis to the changed part to make the difference clearer. (Did it to the main trope's page, too, but I forgot to put the reason there.


'''Nobody''' should confuse this film with ''Disney/TheAristocats''. Several comedians in the documentary note the hazard of accidentally saying "The Aristocats" instead of the actual punchline.

to:

'''Nobody''' should confuse this film with ''Disney/TheAristocats''.''[[Disney/TheAristocats The Aristo]]'''[[Disney/TheAristocats cats]]'''''. Several comedians in the documentary note the hazard of accidentally saying "The Aristocats" instead of the actual punchline.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* FreudianSlip: As noted in the lead, saying "Aristocats" as in the Disney movie screws up everything.
-->"What do you call yourself?" "The Aristocats." Oh, no - the "Aristocrats!" So people would think that was part of the joke, that the guy himself got the name wrong, and people would be saying, "Why did he say 'cats' and then 'crats?'" He didn't. I just had a problem. Which was more absurd.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* WhatCouldHaveBeen: Creator/RodneyDangerfield and Creator/BuddyHackett were both originally going to have scenes, but had to opt out due to health issues. Both of them passed away before the film's release.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* DontExplainTheJoke: ''Completely'' inverted. The whole purpose of the movie is to explain it. Due to the simple foundation of the joke and the tremendous amount of adlibbing and embellishing involved making each telling different, the joke is ''not'' killed in the explanation. Creator/GilbertGottfried breaks the joke down a bit to examine why it's funny:

to:

* DontExplainTheJoke: ''Completely'' inverted. The whole purpose of the movie is to explain it. Due to the simple foundation of the joke and the tremendous amount of adlibbing and embellishing involved making each telling different, the joke is ''not'' killed in the explanation. Creator/GilbertGottfried breaks and several other comedians break the joke down a bit to examine why it's funny:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* SpiritualSuccessor: ''[[http://www.imdb.com/title/tt3132632/ Misery Loves Comedy]]'', which follows the same format but instead discusses the nature of pain and melancholy behind comedy.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* DontExplainTheJoke: ''Completely'' inverted. The whole purpose of the movie is to explain it. Due to the simple foundation of the joke and the tremendous amount of adlibbing and embellishing involved making each telling different, the joke is ''not'' killed in the explanation. GilbertGottfried breaks the joke down a bit to examine why it's funny:

to:

* DontExplainTheJoke: ''Completely'' inverted. The whole purpose of the movie is to explain it. Due to the simple foundation of the joke and the tremendous amount of adlibbing and embellishing involved making each telling different, the joke is ''not'' killed in the explanation. GilbertGottfried Creator/GilbertGottfried breaks the joke down a bit to examine why it's funny:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* WhatCouldHaveBeen: Rodney Dangerfield and Buddy Hackett were both originally going to have scenes, but had to opt out due to health issues. Both of them passed away before the film's release.

to:

* WhatCouldHaveBeen: Rodney Dangerfield Creator/RodneyDangerfield and Buddy Hackett Creator/BuddyHackett were both originally going to have scenes, but had to opt out due to health issues. Both of them passed away before the film's release.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* PrecisionFStrike: One version inverts the joke: describing an extremely bland, sedate act... and then the interviewer asks "What do you call that act?" [[spoiler:"The Cocksucking Motherfuckers."]]

to:

* PrecisionFStrike: One Wendy Liebman's version inverts the joke: describing an extremely bland, sedate act... and then the interviewer asks "What do you call that act?" [[spoiler:"The Cocksucking Motherfuckers."]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* CruelAndUnusualDeath: The punch line to Martin Mull's version of the joke. Three religious missionaries run afoul of an aboriginal tribe and are given a choice of "Death" or "The Aristocrats". The first two choose The Aristocrats, which consists of the men of the tribe brutally violating them in every sexual way imaginable. The third guy, having witnessed the utter horror of The Aristocrats twice now opts for death. The chief says "very well, you shall be put to death... But first, The Aristocrats!"
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None





* ArsonMurderAndJaywalking: In the version GilbertGottfried tells, he frequently recaps all the bodily fluids the family is covered in -- including blood, urine, and feces -- and only makes a big deal out of the sweat.
* BewareTheNiceOnes: How many discovered that BobSaget ain't exactly a family friendly comedian despite his work on ''FullHouse'' and ''AmericasFunniestHomeVideos''.
* BreadEggsMilkSquick: SarahSilverman's version, which places herself in the position of having ''been'' an Aristocrat, and eventually concluding that Joe Franklin raped her.
* {{Corpsing}}: Bob Saget spends half his time laughing at himself. This is in comparison to other comedians, such as GeorgeCarlin, who tell the joke ruthlessly deadpan.
* DeconstructedTrope: SarahSilverman's version is a deconstruction of the joke itself, which normally goes out of its way to never really humanize the characters. (The characters are almost never named, being 'The Father', 'The Daughter' and 'The Agent', etc.) This insulates the audience a little to the shock by abstracting it. Silverman, of course, immediately cast herself as one of the Aristocrats, not just giving you a name, but a ''face'' to all the horrible suffering she then describes. The end result is a "joke" that is incredibly uncomfortable.

to:

* ArsonMurderAndJaywalking: In the version GilbertGottfried Creator/GilbertGottfried tells, he frequently recaps all the bodily fluids the family is covered in -- including blood, urine, and feces -- and only makes a big deal out of the sweat.
* BewareTheNiceOnes: How many discovered that BobSaget Creator/BobSaget ain't exactly a family friendly comedian despite his work on ''FullHouse'' ''Series/FullHouse'' and ''AmericasFunniestHomeVideos''.
''Series/AmericasFunniestHomeVideos''.
* BreadEggsMilkSquick: SarahSilverman's Creator/SarahSilverman's version, which places herself in the position of having ''been'' an Aristocrat, and eventually concluding that Joe Franklin raped her.
* {{Corpsing}}: Bob Saget spends half his time laughing at himself. This is in comparison to other comedians, such as GeorgeCarlin, Creator/GeorgeCarlin, who tell the joke ruthlessly deadpan.
* DeconstructedTrope: SarahSilverman's Sarah Silverman's version is a deconstruction of the joke itself, which normally goes out of its way to never really humanize the characters. (The characters are almost never named, being 'The Father', 'The Daughter' and 'The Agent', etc.) This insulates the audience a little to the shock by abstracting it. Silverman, of course, immediately cast herself as one of the Aristocrats, not just giving you a name, but a ''face'' to all the horrible suffering she then describes. The end result is a "joke" that is incredibly uncomfortable.



Willbyr MOD

Changed: 6

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None





!!'''This documentary includes examples of:'''

to:

!!'''This !!This documentary includes examples of:'''of:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* WildMassGuessing: Billy Connolly muses that the guy explaining the act in the joke will go back to his family and only ''then'' explain what they have to do.

to:

* WildMassGuessing: Billy Connolly muses that the guy explaining the act in the joke will go back to his family and only ''then'' explain what they have to do.do.

----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
The example used different tenses in the same sentence.


* ArsonMurderAndJaywalking: In the version GilbertGottfried tells, he frequently recapped all the bodily fluids the family was covered in -- including blood, urine, and feces -- and only made a big deal out of the sweat.

to:

* ArsonMurderAndJaywalking: In the version GilbertGottfried tells, he frequently recapped recaps all the bodily fluids the family was is covered in -- including blood, urine, and feces -- and only made makes a big deal out of the sweat.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* TheVoiceless: [[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c-Oz1s3nb38 One version]] is told by a Steven Banks as a mime... ''in pantomime''. The best part is he ''does it in public'' while wearing a lapel microphone.

to:

* TheVoiceless: [[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c-Oz1s3nb38 One version]] is told by a Steven Banks as a mime... ''in pantomime''. The best part is he ''does it in public'' while wearing a lapel microphone.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* {{Corpsing}}: Bob Saget spends half his time laughing at himself. This is in comparison to other comedians, such as George Carlin, who tell the joke ruthlessly deadpan.
* DeconstructedTrope: Sarah Silverman's version is a deconstruction of the joke itself, which normally goes out of its way to never really humanize the characters. (The characters are almost never named, being 'The Father', 'The Daughter' and 'The Agent', etc.) This insulates the audience a little to the shock by abstracting it. Silverman, of course, immediately cast herself as one of the Aristocrats, not just giving you a name, but a ''face'' to all the horrible suffering she then describes. The end result is a "joke" that is incredibly uncomfortable.

to:

* {{Corpsing}}: Bob Saget spends half his time laughing at himself. This is in comparison to other comedians, such as George Carlin, GeorgeCarlin, who tell the joke ruthlessly deadpan.
* DeconstructedTrope: Sarah Silverman's SarahSilverman's version is a deconstruction of the joke itself, which normally goes out of its way to never really humanize the characters. (The characters are almost never named, being 'The Father', 'The Daughter' and 'The Agent', etc.) This insulates the audience a little to the shock by abstracting it. Silverman, of course, immediately cast herself as one of the Aristocrats, not just giving you a name, but a ''face'' to all the horrible suffering she then describes. The end result is a "joke" that is incredibly uncomfortable.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


-->''And then the talent agent says, "That's awful. What do you call the act?" Like he wants to know, like the name's the important thing! I don't understand why he would say that. It doesn't matter what it's called! Because no one is gonna book this show! Where did these people find employment?! How did they develop this act?! What made them think this was entertaining?! I mean it's surprising they haven't... that they're not all in jail! I mean... and waiting... waiting for the death penalty! You can put people to death for what goes on in the best versions of this joke! Because you're probably saying, if you have any sense of human decency, "Well, why didn't he stop them the minute he saw the father unzipping his pants?!" And saying, "This is totally wrong! Call the cops! Something horrible's happening! This is a family who are raping their own children, and performing bestiality! Why, oh, why, is he allowing this to happen!" But that's a whole other story. But, anyway, he says, "[[WhatTheHellHero What is it called?]]" [[RuleOfFunny because in a joke that's what happens]]. [[SocialServicesDoesNotExist There's no legal system at all in play in a joke]].''

to:

-->''And then the talent agent says, "That's awful. What do you call the act?" Like he wants to know, like the name's the important thing! I don't understand why he would say that. It doesn't matter what it's called! Because no one is gonna book this show! [[FridgeLogic Where did these people find employment?! How did they develop this act?! What made them think this was entertaining?! entertaining?!]] I mean it's surprising they haven't... that they're not all in jail! I mean... and waiting... waiting for the death penalty! You can put people to death for what goes on in the best versions of this joke! Because you're probably saying, if you have any sense of human decency, "Well, why didn't he stop them the minute he saw the father unzipping his pants?!" And saying, "This is totally wrong! Call the cops! Something horrible's happening! This is a family who are raping their own children, and performing bestiality! Why, oh, why, is he allowing this to happen!" But that's a whole other story. But, anyway, he says, "[[WhatTheHellHero What is it called?]]" [[RuleOfFunny because in a joke that's what happens]]. [[SocialServicesDoesNotExist There's no legal system at all in play in a joke]].''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* TheAristocrats

to:

* TheAristocratsTheAristocrats: TheMovie
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* {{Corpsing}}: Bob Saget spends half his time laughing at himself. This is in comparison to other comedians, such as George Carlin, who tell the joke ruthlessly deadpan.

Changed: 125

Removed: 91

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* BewareTheNiceOnes: How many discovered that BobSaget ain't exactly a family friendly comedian despite [[FullHouse evidence to]] [[AmericasFunniestHomeVideos the contrary]].

to:

* BewareTheNiceOnes: How many discovered that BobSaget ain't exactly a family friendly comedian despite [[FullHouse evidence to]] [[AmericasFunniestHomeVideos the contrary]].his work on ''FullHouse'' and ''AmericasFunniestHomeVideos''.



* DontExplainTheJoke: ''Completely'' inverted. The whole purpose of the movie is to explain it. Due to the simple foundation of the joke and the tremendous amount of adlibbing and embellishing involved making each telling different, the joke is ''not'' killed in the explanation.
* {{Headscratchers}}: GilbertGottfried points this out in explaining why the joke is funny:

to:

* DontExplainTheJoke: ''Completely'' inverted. The whole purpose of the movie is to explain it. Due to the simple foundation of the joke and the tremendous amount of adlibbing and embellishing involved making each telling different, the joke is ''not'' killed in the explanation.
* {{Headscratchers}}:
explanation. GilbertGottfried points this out in explaining why breaks the joke is down a bit to examine why it's funny:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
not a creator page


In 2005, [[Creator/PennAndTeller Penn Jillette]] and [[Radio/WaitWaitDontTellMe Paul Provenza]] made ''The Aristocrats'', a documentary featuring about a hundred comedians telling their own version [[TheAristocrats of the joke]] and their own stories about the history of the joke. While the joke isn't funny (which they note during the film), the comedians talking about the joke are frequently hilarious.

to:

In 2005, [[Creator/PennAndTeller Penn Jillette]] and [[Radio/WaitWaitDontTellMe Paul Provenza]] Provenza made ''The Aristocrats'', a documentary featuring about a hundred comedians telling their own version [[TheAristocrats of the joke]] and their own stories about the history of the joke. While the joke isn't funny (which they note during the film), the comedians talking about the joke are frequently hilarious.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


In 2005, [[PennAndTeller Penn Jillette]] and [[Radio/WaitWaitDontTellMe Paul Provenza]] made ''The Aristocrats'', a documentary featuring about a hundred comedians telling their own version [[TheAristocrats of the joke]] and their own stories about the history of the joke. While the joke isn't funny (which they note during the film), the comedians talking about the joke are frequently hilarious.

to:

In 2005, [[PennAndTeller [[Creator/PennAndTeller Penn Jillette]] and [[Radio/WaitWaitDontTellMe Paul Provenza]] made ''The Aristocrats'', a documentary featuring about a hundred comedians telling their own version [[TheAristocrats of the joke]] and their own stories about the history of the joke. While the joke isn't funny (which they note during the film), the comedians talking about the joke are frequently hilarious.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

[[quoteright:336:http://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/Aristocrats_6967.jpg]]

Added: 16

Changed: 23

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


In 2005, [[PennAndTeller Penn Jillette]] and [[Radio/WaitWaitDontTellMe Paul Provenza]] made ''The Aristocrats'', a documentary featuring about a hundred comedians telling their own version of joke and their own stories about the history of the joke. While the joke isn't funny (which they note during the film), the comedians talking about the joke are frequently hilarious.

to:

In 2005, [[PennAndTeller Penn Jillette]] and [[Radio/WaitWaitDontTellMe Paul Provenza]] made ''The Aristocrats'', a documentary featuring about a hundred comedians telling their own version [[TheAristocrats of joke the joke]] and their own stories about the history of the joke. While the joke isn't funny (which they note during the film), the comedians talking about the joke are frequently hilarious.


Added DiffLines:

* TheAristocrats
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

In 2005, [[PennAndTeller Penn Jillette]] and [[Radio/WaitWaitDontTellMe Paul Provenza]] made ''The Aristocrats'', a documentary featuring about a hundred comedians telling their own version of joke and their own stories about the history of the joke. While the joke isn't funny (which they note during the film), the comedians talking about the joke are frequently hilarious.

'''Nobody''' should confuse this film with ''Disney/TheAristocats''. Several comedians in the documentary note the hazard of accidentally saying "The Aristocats" instead of the actual punchline.
----
!!'''This documentary includes examples of:'''
* ArsonMurderAndJaywalking: In the version GilbertGottfried tells, he frequently recapped all the bodily fluids the family was covered in -- including blood, urine, and feces -- and only made a big deal out of the sweat.
* BewareTheNiceOnes: How many discovered that BobSaget ain't exactly a family friendly comedian despite [[FullHouse evidence to]] [[AmericasFunniestHomeVideos the contrary]].
* BreadEggsMilkSquick: SarahSilverman's version, which places herself in the position of having ''been'' an Aristocrat, and eventually concluding that Joe Franklin raped her.
* DeconstructedTrope: Sarah Silverman's version is a deconstruction of the joke itself, which normally goes out of its way to never really humanize the characters. (The characters are almost never named, being 'The Father', 'The Daughter' and 'The Agent', etc.) This insulates the audience a little to the shock by abstracting it. Silverman, of course, immediately cast herself as one of the Aristocrats, not just giving you a name, but a ''face'' to all the horrible suffering she then describes. The end result is a "joke" that is incredibly uncomfortable.
* DontExplainTheJoke: ''Completely'' inverted. The whole purpose of the movie is to explain it. Due to the simple foundation of the joke and the tremendous amount of adlibbing and embellishing involved making each telling different, the joke is ''not'' killed in the explanation.
* {{Headscratchers}}: GilbertGottfried points this out in explaining why the joke is funny:
-->''And then the talent agent says, "That's awful. What do you call the act?" Like he wants to know, like the name's the important thing! I don't understand why he would say that. It doesn't matter what it's called! Because no one is gonna book this show! Where did these people find employment?! How did they develop this act?! What made them think this was entertaining?! I mean it's surprising they haven't... that they're not all in jail! I mean... and waiting... waiting for the death penalty! You can put people to death for what goes on in the best versions of this joke! Because you're probably saying, if you have any sense of human decency, "Well, why didn't he stop them the minute he saw the father unzipping his pants?!" And saying, "This is totally wrong! Call the cops! Something horrible's happening! This is a family who are raping their own children, and performing bestiality! Why, oh, why, is he allowing this to happen!" But that's a whole other story. But, anyway, he says, "[[WhatTheHellHero What is it called?]]" [[RuleOfFunny because in a joke that's what happens]]. [[SocialServicesDoesNotExist There's no legal system at all in play in a joke]].''
* {{Inversion}}: The inverted version of the joke is an inversion; the act is sedate, the title is profane.
* PrecisionFStrike: One version inverts the joke: describing an extremely bland, sedate act... and then the interviewer asks "What do you call that act?" [[spoiler:"The Cocksucking Motherfuckers."]]
* SelfDeprecation: Carrot Top -- "It's not a fucking prop act, is it?"
* OrphanedPunchline meets MemeticMutation: Since the movie took it from an InJoke among comedians to something better known, "...the Aristocrats!" has gained status similar to "that's what she said" in some circles.
* TheVoiceless: [[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c-Oz1s3nb38 One version]] is told by a Steven Banks as a mime... ''in pantomime''. The best part is he ''does it in public'' while wearing a lapel microphone.
* WhatCouldHaveBeen: Rodney Dangerfield and Buddy Hackett were both originally going to have scenes, but had to opt out due to health issues. Both of them passed away before the film's release.
* WildMassGuessing: Billy Connolly muses that the guy explaining the act in the joke will go back to his family and only ''then'' explain what they have to do.

Top