Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Film / StrangerThanFiction

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** [[InvokedTropes Invoked with the novel itself, as it's stated in the film that Eiffel began writing the book just after she had been audited]]

to:

** [[InvokedTropes [[InvokedTrope Invoked with the novel itself, as it's stated in the film that Eiffel began writing the book just after she had been audited]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** [[InvokedTropes Invoked with the novel itself, as it's stated in the film that Eiffel began writing the book just after she had been audited]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

-->'''Dr. Hilbert''': Come back Friday -- wait, you said, "imminent." You could be dead by Friday. Come back tomorrow.

Changed: 181

Removed: 132

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
minor edits


* LiteraryAgentHypothesis: The suggestion throughout is that the book Karen was working on would ultimately become this film.
* [[OnlySaneEmployee Liz Lemon Job]]: Karen Eiffel's publisher hires a "personal assistant" to make sure she finishes her new novel.

to:

* LiteraryAgentHypothesis: The suggestion throughout is that the book Karen was working on would ultimately become this film.
* [[OnlySaneEmployee Liz Lemon Job]]:
OnlySaneEmployee: Karen Eiffel's publisher hires a "personal assistant" to make sure she finishes her new novel.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


The film also gives us the perspective of Karen Eiffel (played by Creator/EmmaThompson), an author currently suffering from severe writer's block. Apparently she's been working on this novel for quite some time, but is at a complete loss at how to kill off her protagonist... one Mr. Harold Crick.

to:

The film (released November 10th, 2006) also gives us the perspective of Karen Eiffel (played by Creator/EmmaThompson), an author currently suffering from severe writer's block. Apparently she's been working on this novel for quite some time, but is at a complete loss at how to kill off her protagonist... one Mr. Harold Crick.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* TrailersAlwaysLie: The movie was portrayed as typical Will Ferrell comedy in advertisements, which it is decidedly not.

to:

* TrailersAlwaysLie: The movie was portrayed as typical Will Ferrell comedy in advertisements, which it is decidedly not. Also counts as PlayingAgainstType: Will Ferrell is usually wacky and over-the-top in his roles, but the wackiest moment in the movie is his RageAgainstTheAuthor moment, which is actually justified and pretty low-key.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* BookEnds: The opening narration talks about Harold's wristwatch's opinions on Harold. [[spoiler:The ending talks about how Harold's wristwatch decided to perform a HeroicSacrifice to save his life.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ArtisticLicenseLaw: Most professions that are prohibited from accepting gifts have a minimum dollar amount. A batch of cookies would likely not be considered material.

Added: 366

Changed: 746

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* DesignStudentsOrgasm: More of an auditor's orgasm. Harold's number-obsessed view of the world shows up as hovering numbers and graphs that expand out of the objects he's analyzing.
* DeusExMachina: [[invoked]] In-universe. [[spoiler: The author decides that she can't kill off Harold Crick, seeing as how he was willing to sacrifice himself to save a child, on top of not wanting to kill someone who exists in real life. Hilbert points out it ruins the story and its theme with the deus ex machina and is very out of place with the rest of the novel, but Karen decides that is an acceptable tradeoff for letting Harold live.]]

to:

* DesignStudentsOrgasm: More of an auditor's orgasm. Harold's number-obsessed view of the world shows up as hovering numbers and graphs that expand out of the objects he's analyzing. He is, however, particular as to what it is he measures out, and seems to be upset when someone implies he counted something he didn't.
* DeusExMachina: [[invoked]] In-universe. [[spoiler: The author decides that she can't kill off Harold Crick, seeing as how he was willing to sacrifice himself to save a child, on top of not wanting to kill someone who exists in real life. Hilbert points out it ruins the story and its theme with the deus ex machina and is very out of place with the rest of the novel, novel (as currently written), but Karen decides that is an acceptable tradeoff for letting Harold live.]]



* TheEveryman: Harold is depicted as the average man.

to:

* TheEveryman: Harold is depicted as the average man.man, to the most boring degree possible.



* InformedAbility: Karen's writing ability. We only see (and hear) snippets of it--both Harold and Hilbert think the full manuscript is a brilliant masterpiece, but we only see quick snatches as they read through it.

to:

* InformedAbility: Karen's writing ability. We only see (and hear) snippets of it--both Harold and Hilbert think the full manuscript is a brilliant masterpiece, but we only see quick snatches as they read through it.it, and only hear her narrate when it applies to Harold in her story.



* ManicPixieDreamGirl: Ms. Pascal is one of the things that gives Harold something to live for. Also, being GenreSavvy, Hilbert asks if he has recently met anyone whose shaken up his life.
* MorningRoutine: How the movie starts is Harold's routine, and Eiffel narrating it.

to:

* ManicPixieDreamGirl: Ms. Pascal Pascal, and their developing relationship, is one of the things that gives Harold something to live for. Also, for.
**Also,
being GenreSavvy, Hilbert asks if he has recently met anyone whose shaken up his life.
* MorningRoutine: How the movie starts is with Harold's routine, and Eiffel narrating it.



* {{Narrator}} Karen Eiffel narrates Harold's life, but she's also a character herself in his life. Both of them are initially unaware of this fact.

to:

* {{Narrator}} Karen Eiffel narrates Harold's life, but she's also a character herself in his life. Both of them are initially unaware of this fact. fact, Eiffel even moreso because she, as the writer ''writing'' the very scene, doesn't realize it is her that Harold is calling on the phone.
** Until his apartment is wrecked, it is never established if he was being controlled by Eiffel's writing or if she was just narrating what he was doing at the time.



* PostModernism: The narrator doesn't know they are the narrator.

to:

* PostModernism: The narrator doesn't know they are the narrator. Or if in her story as written Harold knows there is a narrator.


Added DiffLines:

** It does have to be typed out, as she had a draft of the ending done on legal pads that didn't effect reality.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* LizLemonJob: Karen Eiffel's publisher hires a "personal assistant" to make sure she finishes her new novel.

to:

* LizLemonJob: [[OnlySaneEmployee Liz Lemon Job]]: Karen Eiffel's publisher hires a "personal assistant" to make sure she finishes her new novel.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* CruelTwistEnding: Eiffel's signature is a sudden death for the protagonist just as their life was improving.

to:

* CruelTwistEnding: Eiffel's signature is a sudden death for the protagonist protagonists just as their life was lives were improving.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


-->'''Jules''': Have you met any girl you might have might shaken your world view?

to:

-->'''Jules''': Have you met any girl you that might have might shaken your world view?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Addition of "Sweet Baker" to Tropes List

Added DiffLines:

* SweetBaker: Double Subverted. When Harold is sent to audit Ana's bakery, she is rude and deliberately standoffish to him because he's an IRS agent and she's a hippie who donates baked goods to the homeless and refuses to pay the exact percentage of her taxes that would have gone to fund "national defense, corporate loan-outs, and campaign discretionary funds'' (27%, to be exact). But Ana eventually regrets her treatment of Harold and begins to warm up to him, even giving him cookies as a form of apology for how she treated him earlier. Harold sees the kind and caring side of Ana, and the two fall in love.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Not the trope


* ABoyAndHisX: The opening narration mentions "This is a story about a man named Harold Crick. {{Beat}} And his wristwatch."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* FaceDeathWithDignity: Once he finally sees what's in store for him, Harold gives Karen permission to finish her book as it's originally written.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


%%* GranolaGirl: Ana Pascal, our resident baker.

to:

%%* * GranolaGirl: Ana Pascal, our resident baker.baker, is of the "hate TheMan" type.



* ManicPixieDreamGirl: Ms. Pascal is one of the things that gives Harold something to live for. Also, being genre savy, Hilbert asks if he has recently met anyone whose shaken up his life.

to:

* ManicPixieDreamGirl: Ms. Pascal is one of the things that gives Harold something to live for. Also, being genre savy, GenreSavvy, Hilbert asks if he has recently met anyone whose shaken up his life.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


That one narration is enough to thrust Harold into action, eager to do anything it takes to avoid his death. Though told he's schizophrenic by the psychologist he sees, Harold refuses to believe such a diagnosis. Instead, he seeks out the foremost professor in literature, Dr. Jules Hilbert (played by Dustin Hoffman). Hilbert quizzes him extensively on the narrator, then sets Harold to figuring out whether he's in a comedy or tragedy. After all, in a comedy he'll get hitched, but in a tragedy he'll die.

The film also gives us the perspective of Karen Eiffel (played by Emma Thompson), an author currently suffering from severe writer's block. Apparently she's been working on this novel for quite some time, but is at a complete loss at how to kill off her protagonist... one Mr. Harold Crick.

to:

That one narration is enough to thrust Harold into action, eager to do anything it takes to avoid his death. Though told he's schizophrenic by the psychologist he sees, Harold refuses to believe such a diagnosis. Instead, he seeks out the foremost professor in literature, Dr. Jules Hilbert (played by Dustin Hoffman).Creator/DustinHoffman). Hilbert quizzes him extensively on the narrator, then sets Harold to figuring out whether he's in a comedy or tragedy. After all, in a comedy he'll get hitched, but in a tragedy he'll die.

The film also gives us the perspective of Karen Eiffel (played by Emma Thompson), Creator/EmmaThompson), an author currently suffering from severe writer's block. Apparently she's been working on this novel for quite some time, but is at a complete loss at how to kill off her protagonist... one Mr. Harold Crick.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* TrueArtIsAngsty: Invoked by Karen, who believes this and that's why she writes all her novels to end with the protagonist's tragic death just before they accomplish something great.

to:

* TrueArtIsAngsty: Invoked by Karen, who believes this and that's why she writes all her novels to end with the protagonist's tragic death just before they accomplish something great. Also gives us the final punchline of the movie. [[spoiler:Karen changes the story at the last moment so Harold survives getting run over and gets a pretty happy ending out of it. Upon reading it, Professor Hilbert deems the ending of the book just okay.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


--> '''Hilbert:''' I've written papers on "Little did he know." I've taught classes on "Little did he know." I once gave an entire seminar based upon "Little did he know." Sonofabitch, Harold. [[DramaticIrony "Little did he know" means there's something he did not know.]] [[MindScrew That means there's something you don't know.]] [[CrowningMomentofFunny Did you know that?]]

to:

--> '''Hilbert:''' I've written papers on "Little did he know." I've taught classes on "Little did he know." I once gave an entire seminar based upon "Little did he know." Sonofabitch, Harold. [[DramaticIrony "Little did he know" means there's something he did not know.]] [[MindScrew That means there's something you don't know.]] [[CrowningMomentofFunny [[SugarWiki/FunnyMoments Did you know that?]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* AnarchyIsChaos: Ana Pascal seems to think so when says that anarchists assembling in groups would "defeat the purpose".

Added: 107

Changed: 389

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* {{Adorkable}}: It's implied that Ana finally starts falling for Harold due to this trope, and it's pretty easy to see why.

to:

* {{Adorkable}}: It's implied that Ana finally starts falling for Harold due to this trope, because he's goofy and endearing, and it's pretty easy to see why.



* ImportantHaircut: One of the first things Karen remarks on upon seeing Harold for the first time.

to:

* %%% Is the importance of the haircut that Karen uses it as a conversation start?
%%%*
ImportantHaircut: One of the first things Karen remarks on upon seeing Harold for the first time.time is...



* LemonyNarrator: In-universe example with Karen Eiffel's narration. Notable that she's not a man (though she is British), unlike most examples of this trope.

to:

* LemonyNarrator: In-universe example with Karen Eiffel's narration.narration, which can get quite sarcastic about Harold's life. Notable that she's not a man (though she is British), unlike most examples of this trope.



* LiteraryAgentHypothesis: The suggestion throughout that the book Karen was working on would ultimately become this film.

to:

* LiteraryAgentHypothesis: The suggestion throughout is that the book Karen was working on would ultimately become this film.



* ManicPixieDreamGirl: Ms. Pascal is one of the things that gives Harold something to live for.

to:

* ManicPixieDreamGirl: Ms. Pascal is one of the things that gives Harold something to live for. Also, being genre savy, Hilbert asks if he has recently met anyone whose shaken up his life.



* MyGodWhatHaveIDone: Happens to Karen Eiffel twice. The first time, it's when she's learned that Harold is real, that what she's written actually happens to him, and that [[spoiler: she may have killed real people with her previous novels]]. The second, combined with a HeroicBSOD, is after [[spoiler: she's just typed out the sentence that kills Harold]].

to:

* MyGodWhatHaveIDone: Happens A shocking realization happens to Karen Eiffel twice. The first time, it's when she's learned that Harold is real, that what she's written actually happens to him, and that [[spoiler: she may have killed real people with her previous novels]]. The second, combined with a HeroicBSOD, is after [[spoiler: she's just typed out the sentence that kills Harold]].



* TrueArtIsAngsty: Invoked by Karen, who believes this and why all of her novels have the protagonist being offed.

to:

* TrueArtIsAngsty: Invoked by Karen, who believes this and that's why she writes all of her novels have to end with the protagonist being offed.protagonist's tragic death just before they accomplish something great.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* DeusExMachina: [[invoked]] In-universe. [[spoiler: The author decides that she can't kill off Harold Crick, seeing as how he was willing to sacrifice himself to save a child, on top of not wanting to kill someone who exists in real life. Hilbert points out it ruins the story and its theme with the deus ex machina and is very out of place with the rest of the novel, but Karen figures she'll rewrite it a bit better.]]

to:

* DeusExMachina: [[invoked]] In-universe. [[spoiler: The author decides that she can't kill off Harold Crick, seeing as how he was willing to sacrifice himself to save a child, on top of not wanting to kill someone who exists in real life. Hilbert points out it ruins the story and its theme with the deus ex machina and is very out of place with the rest of the novel, but Karen figures she'll rewrite it a bit better.decides that is an acceptable tradeoff for letting Harold live.]]

Added: 359

Changed: 261

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AmbiguousDisorder: Karen Eiffel is very unusual in the way she acts around others, sometimes coming off as aggressive and distant. She also takes time imagining deaths, usually imagining herself being the one who dies, and at one point asks a nurse at a hospital "where are the dying people" because she wanted a visual to help imagine Harold's death.

to:

* AmbiguousDisorder: Karen Eiffel is very unusual in the way she acts around others, sometimes coming off as aggressive and distant. She also takes time imagining deaths, usually imagining herself being the one who dies, and at one point asks a nurse at a hospital "where are the dying people" because she wanted a visual to help imagine Harold's death. Harold as well; the visual effects mentioned under DesignStudentsOrgasm are noted in the commentary to be Harold's mental accounting for various items in the world. That plus Harold's difficulty in socializing are meant to suggest that Harold is TheRainMan.



* MyGodWhatHaveIDone: Happens to Karen Eiffel twice. The first time, it's when she's learned that Harold is real, that what she's written actually happens to him, and that [[spoiler: she may have killed real people with her previous novels]]. The second, combined with a HeroicBSOD, is after [[spoiler: she's just typed out the sentence that kills Harold]].



* RealityWritingBook: Presumably, any book Eiffel writes a story in could affect reality. It's definitely happening to Harold, and Eiffel is shaken that it could have happened to her previous characters

to:

* RealityWritingBook: Presumably, any book Eiffel writes a story in could affect reality. It's definitely happening to Harold, and Eiffel is shaken that it could have happened to her previous characterscharacters.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** In the context of the book Karen is writing about Harold, it's a straight example of WritersCannotDoMath. In the larger frame of the movie the fact that Harold is better at math than Karen casts some early doubt on the whole "fictional character vs. real author" relationship. Consider as well that he gave his answer before Karen's narration.

to:

** In the context of the book Karen is writing about Harold, it's a straight example of WritersCannotDoMath. In the larger frame of the movie the fact that Harold is better at math than Karen casts some early doubt on the whole "fictional character vs. real author" relationship. Consider as well that he gave his answer before Karen's narration.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Harold's sacrifice was not to save the child, as he had enough knowledge to save the child before the accident, but instead to preserve Karen Eiffel's "masterpiece" storyline.


** [[spoiler: When Harold Crick reads the ending Karen Eiffel finally decided on: that he is [[TakingTheBullet killed by a bus after pushing a child out of the way]]: he decides that it's a sacrifice worth making, and goes through with it with full knowledge of the consequences]].

to:

** [[spoiler: When Harold Crick reads the ending Karen Eiffel finally decided on: that he is [[TakingTheBullet killed by a bus after pushing a child out of the way]]: he decides that it's preserving the plot of the novel and continuing to knowingly be a part of this literary masterpiece is a sacrifice worth making, and goes through with it with full knowledge of the consequences]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Redirects to a Useful Notes/ page, which should not be included in a trope list


* TheWindyCity: Although the story quite clearly takes place in Chicago (a man is seen reading the Tribune on the bus, the Dearborn Street subway station sign is seen, as is "Illinois Lottery" at the bodega where Karen buys the apple) there is strangely no specific mention of such, even though the buses that go throughout the movie are obviously CTA buses with the logos hidden.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* TrueArtIsAngsty: Invoked by Karen, who believes this and why all of her novels have the protagonist being offed.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* NoFourthWall: Only between the author and her protagonist, though. The fourth wall of the movie is very much intact.

to:

* NoFourthWall: Only NoInnerFourthWall: There is no fourth wall between the author and her protagonist, though. The but the fourth wall between them and the audience of the movie is very much intact.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


----
<<|{{Film}}|>>

to:

----
<<|{{Film}}|>>
----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ChekhovsGun: The watch. Repeatedly pointed out as such -- in fact, treated by the narrator like an entirely separate character.

to:

* ChekhovsGun: The watch. Repeatedly pointed out as such -- in such--in fact, treated by the narrator like an entirely separate character.



** Both the novel and the film itself treat [[spoiler:Harold's watch as its own character. When the bus slams into Harold, the first thing it hits is his watch -- which is destroyed, but a part of it becomes embedded permanently in his arm and slows down the hemorrhage that would have killed him otherwise. So just like Harold [[TakingTheBullet stepped in front of a bus to save a child]], his watch took the brunt of the hit for him]].

to:

** Both the novel and the film itself treat [[spoiler:Harold's watch as its own character. When the bus slams into Harold, the first thing it hits is his watch -- which watch--which is destroyed, but a part of it becomes embedded permanently in his arm and slows down the hemorrhage that would have killed him otherwise. So just like Harold [[TakingTheBullet stepped in front of a bus to save a child]], his watch took the brunt of the hit for him]].



* InformedAbility: Karen's writing ability. We only see (and hear) snippets of it - both Harold and Hilbert think the full manuscript is a brilliant masterpiece, but we only see quick snatches as they read through it.

to:

* InformedAbility: Karen's writing ability. We only see (and hear) snippets of it - both it--both Harold and Hilbert think the full manuscript is a brilliant masterpiece, but we only see quick snatches as they read through it.



* JerkassHasAPoint: As incredibly brusque and seemingly uncaring Hilbert is about the inevitable death of Harold, people DO have their lives changed for the better from literary works - [[spoiler:and he knew about Harold saving the child in the end, too.]]

to:

* JerkassHasAPoint: As incredibly brusque and seemingly uncaring Hilbert is about the inevitable death of Harold, people DO have their lives changed for the better from literary works - [[spoiler:and works--[[spoiler:and he knew about Harold saving the child in the end, too.]]too]].



* ShootTheShaggyDog: According to Professor Hilbert, all of Karen Eiffel's previous novels have ended with the protagonist dying just short of accomplishing something, and the rough draft of Harold Crick's story is no different. [[spoiler:It later becomes part of the reason as to why Karen rewrites the ending - she tells Hilbert the dramatic irony and poignancy of Harold's death would have been nullified by someone who willingly went to die for a noble cause.]]

to:

* ShootTheShaggyDog: According to Professor Hilbert, all of Karen Eiffel's previous novels have ended with the protagonist dying just short of accomplishing something, and the rough draft of Harold Crick's story is no different. [[spoiler:It later becomes part of the reason as to why Karen rewrites the ending - she ending--she tells Hilbert the dramatic irony and poignancy of Harold's death would have been nullified by someone who willingly went to die for a noble cause.]]



* TakeOurWordForIt: The brilliance of Eiffel's original ending. It's hard to tell from watching the film where the poetry was in [[spoiler:Harold dying from a confluence of three different storylines -- his own, the boy on the bike's, and that of the bus driver]].

to:

* TakeOurWordForIt: The brilliance of Eiffel's original ending. It's hard to tell from watching the film where the poetry was in [[spoiler:Harold dying from a confluence of three different storylines -- his storylines--his own, the boy on the bike's, and that of the bus driver]].



* WhatIsOneMansLifeInComparison: The idea is batted about that maybe [[spoiler: the possible contribution to world literature and the greater meaning of his planned death mean that Harold should accept his death as it was written. Hilbert's speech about the original ending comes off as pretty damn cold concerning his implied utter disregard for Harold's life]].

to:

* WhatIsOneMansLifeInComparison: The idea is batted about that maybe [[spoiler: the [[spoiler:the possible contribution to world literature and the greater meaning of his planned death mean that Harold should accept his death as it was written. Hilbert's speech about the original ending comes off as pretty damn cold concerning his implied utter disregard for Harold's life]].

Top