Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Fixing indentation
Changed line(s) 84 (click to see context) from:
---> '''Brian:''' Thanks for making a martyr of me. If it wasn't for you, I'd still be alive and... no one would care.
to:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Black Sheep cleanup, removing misuse and ZCE
Deleted line(s) 51 (click to see context) :
* BlackSheep: Not exactly elaborated upon in the movie, but Brian was basically this both within his family for being the wild child at a time where children were expected to be seen and not heard and within the Rolling Stones as Brian’s more unstable behavior increasingly alienated his bandmates.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Changed line(s) 32 (click to see context) from:
* AmbiguousDisorder: Brian in real life likely had bipolar disorder, which would explain his oft-noted mood swings and erratic behaviour, as well as his apparent sex addiction (given that he fathered five children between the ages of 17 and 23). It’s not as clear in the movie, but it’s likely, given his erratic behaviour
to:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Poisonous Friend is no longer a trope
Changed line(s) 203,204 (click to see context) from:
* PimpedOutCape: Brian in at least two scenes
* PoisonousFriend: There’s a lot of that going on, but one of the more notable examples would be Brian and Tom
* PoisonousFriend: There’s a lot of that going on, but one of the more notable examples would be Brian and Tom
to:
* PimpedOutCape: Brian in at least two scenes
* PoisonousFriend: There’s a lot of that going on, but one of the more notable examples would be Brian and Tomscenes.
* PoisonousFriend: There’s a lot of that going on, but one of the more notable examples would be Brian and Tom
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Merged trope, DA already listed so adding text from BB would be redundant
Deleted line(s) 47 (click to see context) :
* BastardBoyfriend: This doesn’t even begin to explain Brian’s general conduct towards his girlfriends in this movie (or real life, for that matter).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* VerbedTitle: PunBasedTitle on Music/{{The Rolling Stones|Band}}.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3,4 (click to see context) from:
''Stoned'' is a 2005 British biopic that focuses on Music/BrianJones, who was a founding member (or ''the'' founding member, by some accounts) of Music/TheRollingStones. The film focuses primarily on the last three months of his life, though the film is littered with flashbacks just so the audience can get a sense of how we got here. It also advances the notion that Jones was murdered by builder Frank Thorogood, even though the official ruling was death by misadventure (it helps that it’s a real-life {{conspiracy theory}}), and primarily aims to tell that story.
to:
''Stoned'' is a 2005 British biopic that focuses on Music/BrianJones, who was a founding member (or ''the'' founding member, by some accounts) of Music/TheRollingStones.Music/{{The Rolling Stones|Band}}. The film focuses primarily on the last three months of his life, though the film is littered with flashbacks just so the audience can get a sense of how we got here. It also advances the notion that Jones was murdered by builder Frank Thorogood, even though the official ruling was death by misadventure (it helps that it’s a real-life {{conspiracy theory}}), and primarily aims to tell that story.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 52 (click to see context) from:
* BlackSheep: Not exactly elaborated upon in the movie, but Brian was basically this both within for being the wild child at a time where children were expected to be seen and not heard and within the Rolling Stones as Brian’s more unstable behaviour increasingly alienated his bandmates.
to:
* BlackSheep: Not exactly elaborated upon in the movie, but Brian was basically this both within his family for being the wild child at a time where children were expected to be seen and not heard and within the Rolling Stones as Brian’s more unstable behaviour behavior increasingly alienated his bandmates.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 37 (click to see context) from:
** The Stones’ soon-to-be manager, Andrew Loog Oldham, claims he helped break Music/TheBeatles in America. In reality, he only worked with Brian Epstein for a brief spell, and the affiliation ended long before the Fab Four hit it big in the States.
to:
** The Stones’ soon-to-be manager, Andrew Loog Oldham, claims he helped to break Music/TheBeatles in America. In reality, he only worked with Brian Epstein for a brief spell, and the affiliation ended long before the Fab Four hit it big in the States. (Possibly justified in-universe as Oldham puffing himself up to get the gig.)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 37 (click to see context) from:
** The Stones’ soon-to-be manager, Andrew Loog Oldham, claims he helped break Music/TheBeatles in America. In reality, he only worked with Brian Epstein for a brief spell, and the affiliation had ended long before the Fab Four hit it big in the States.
to:
** The Stones’ soon-to-be manager, Andrew Loog Oldham, claims he helped break Music/TheBeatles in America. In reality, he only worked with Brian Epstein for a brief spell, and the affiliation had ended long before the Fab Four hit it big in the States.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 37 (click to see context) from:
** The Stones’ soon-to-be manager, Andrew Loog Oldham, claims he helped break Music/TheBeatles in America. In reality, he only worked with Brian Epstein for a brief spell, and his affiliation with the Beatles had ended long before they hit it big in the States.
to:
** The Stones’ soon-to-be manager, Andrew Loog Oldham, claims he helped break Music/TheBeatles in America. In reality, he only worked with Brian Epstein for a brief spell, and his the affiliation with the Beatles had ended long before they the Fab Four hit it big in the States.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 36 (click to see context) from:
** Brian is shown with a Robert Johnson record in 1959, two years before any such records existed in the UK.
to:
** Brian is shown with a Robert Johnson record Music/RobertJohnson album in 1959, two years before any such records existed in the UK.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 41 (click to see context) from:
* AssholeVictim: Despite being the film’s main protagonist, it can be hard to sympathize with Brian in his final moments after the movie mostly depicts him being a prick to just about everyone he knows.
to:
* AssholeVictim: Despite being the film’s main protagonist, it can be hard to sympathize with Brian in his final moments moments, after the movie has mostly depicts depicted him being a prick to just about everyone he knows.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 37 (click to see context) from:
** The Stones’ soon-to-be manager, Andrew Loog Oldham, claims he helped break the Beatles in America. In reality, he only worked with Brian Epstein for a spell, and his affiliation with the Scousers had ended long before either the Beatles or the Stones broke in America.
to:
** The Stones’ soon-to-be manager, Andrew Loog Oldham, claims he helped break the Beatles Music/TheBeatles in America. In reality, he only worked with Brian Epstein for a brief spell, and his affiliation with the Scousers Beatles had ended long before either they hit it big in the Beatles or the Stones broke in America. States.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 12 (click to see context) from:
* TheSixties: This film primarily takes place in mid-1969 (from April to July, specifically), but the flashbacks range from 1959 to 1968.
to:
* TheSixties: This film primarily takes place in mid-1969 (from April to July, specifically), but while the flashbacks range from 1959 to 1968.