Follow TV Tropes

Following

History DethroningMoment / AnimatedFilms

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[folder: Dreamworks Animation]]

to:

[[folder: Dreamworks [[folder:Dreamworks Animation]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Loekman3: The treatment of Shen and Kai is treated in ''WesternAnimation/KungFuPanda4'' is one of the most disrespectful moments that I've ever seen, almost as if the creators of the movie personally decided shaft them in favor of their new OC villain (and a really bad one at that). For context, the ArcVillain of the movie, The Chameleon has summoned Kung Fu masters from the Spirit Realm in order to steal their techniques which also includes the {{BigBad}}s of the previous movies. Now Tai Lung at least was treated with respect but no such thing happens to the other two, not only do they not speak at all here but Po barely acknowledges them. And at the the end they both decided to bow to Po in respect without telling as to why did they reform. Kai especially has it bad as not only there isn't any explanation as to how he came back after we saw him getting blown up onscreen in the previous movie but there is absolutely no sign of him even reforming (wheareas you could maybe make the assumption that Shen finds inner peace given that we saw him closing his eyes just before his death). If this is the best they can do, then they're simply better off not bothering to feature them at all.

to:

* Loekman3: The treatment of way that that Shen and Kai is treated in ''WesternAnimation/KungFuPanda4'' is one of the most disrespectful moments that I've ever seen, almost as if the creators of the movie personally decided shaft them in favor of their new OC villain (and a really bad one at that). For context, the ArcVillain of the movie, The Chameleon has summoned Kung Fu masters from the Spirit Realm in order to steal their techniques which also includes the {{BigBad}}s of the previous movies. Now Tai Lung at least was treated with respect but no such thing happens to the other two, not only do they not speak at all here but Po barely acknowledges them. And at the the end they both decided to bow to Po in respect without telling as to why did they reform. Kai especially has it bad as not only there isn't any explanation as to how he came back after we saw him getting blown up onscreen in the previous movie but there is absolutely no sign of him even reforming (wheareas you could maybe make the assumption that Shen finds inner peace given that we saw him closing his eyes just before his death). If this is the best they can do, then they're simply better off not bothering to feature them at all.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Loekman3: The treatment of Shen and Kai is treated in ''WesternAnimation/KungFuPanda4'' is one of the most disrespectful moments that I've ever seen, almost as if the creators of the movie personally decided shaft them in favor of their new OC villain (and a really bad one at that). For context, the ArcVillain of the movie, The Chameleon has summoned Kung Fu masters from the Spirit Realm in order to steal their techniques which also includes the {{BigBad}}s of the previous movies. Now Tai Lung at least was treated with respect but no such thing happens to the other two, not only do they not speak at all here but Po barely acknowledges them. And at the the end they both decided to bow to Po in respect without telling as to why did they reform. Kai especially has it bad as not only there isn't any explanation as to how he came back after we saw him getting blown up onscreen in the previous movie but there is absolutely no sign of him even reforming (wheareas you could maybe make the assumption that Shen finds inner peace given that we saw him closing his eyes just before his death). If this is the best they can do, then they're simply better off not bothering to feature them at all.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Tropers/MathsAngelicVersion: I had very little sympathy for King Triton in the original ''WesternAnimation/TheLittleMermaid1989''. He started off as an intolerant jerk, and while he did have some CharacterDevelopment later, it wasn't enough to redeem him in my eyes. Then comes ''WesternAnimation/TheLittleMermaidIIIArielsBeginning'', which shows how he became bigoted against humans. That'd make him a tragic character whom I'd finally understand and respect, right? Well, as you've probably guessed, because this is on a [=DMoS=] page, nope. It turns out that this is the "explanation": He once gave his wife, Athena, a music box. Then a pirate ship appeared, and everyone escaped while the pirates presumably tried to steal their stuff. That is, everyone but Athena. She threw herself in front of the ship to try to save the music box, which unsurprisingly got her crushed to death instead. This apparently made Triton hate humans. There are two big problems with this: The first is that Triton is too quick to generalise humans as bad, and [[AmbiguouslyEvil it's not even clear how bad these humans were]] (maybe Athena basically popped up out of nowhere from their point of view, so they couldn't have avoided her). The second is Athena was TooDumbToLive, or at least had a bad case of SkewedPriorities. It was just a music box. Triton could get her another one. She had absolutely no reason to risk her life for it. Her death was at least partly her own fault (the human equivalent would be her running into traffic and being hit -- even if the driver who hit her made no attempt to stop, she'd still be an idiot for running into traffic in the first place), and yet Triton puts all the blame on the humans. All in all, this attempt at making Triton a TragicBigot only made him even more unlikable to me. I realize that his bigotry isn't supposed to be justified, but it should at least be understandable. Otherwise, he just ends up looking like a villain. Him having some resentment toward humans would be okay, but this is just stupid. \\

to:

* Tropers/MathsAngelicVersion: I had very little sympathy for King Triton in the original ''WesternAnimation/TheLittleMermaid1989''. He started off as an intolerant jerk, and while he did have some CharacterDevelopment later, it wasn't enough to redeem him in my eyes. Then comes ''WesternAnimation/TheLittleMermaidIIIArielsBeginning'', ''WesternAnimation/TheLittleMermaidArielsBeginning'', which shows how he became bigoted against humans. That'd make him a tragic character whom I'd finally understand and respect, right? Well, as you've probably guessed, because this is on a [=DMoS=] page, nope. It turns out that this is the "explanation": He once gave his wife, Athena, a music box. Then a pirate ship appeared, and everyone escaped while the pirates presumably tried to steal their stuff. That is, everyone but Athena. She threw herself in front of the ship to try to save the music box, which unsurprisingly got her crushed to death instead. This apparently made Triton hate humans. There are two big problems with this: The first is that Triton is too quick to generalise humans as bad, and [[AmbiguouslyEvil it's not even clear how bad these humans were]] (maybe Athena basically popped up out of nowhere from their point of view, so they couldn't have avoided her). The second is Athena was TooDumbToLive, or at least had a bad case of SkewedPriorities. It was just a music box. Triton could get her another one. She had absolutely no reason to risk her life for it. Her death was at least partly her own fault (the human equivalent would be her running into traffic and being hit -- even if the driver who hit her made no attempt to stop, she'd still be an idiot for running into traffic in the first place), and yet Triton puts all the blame on the humans. All in all, this attempt at making Triton a TragicBigot only made him even more unlikable to me. I realize that his bigotry isn't supposed to be justified, but it should at least be understandable. Otherwise, he just ends up looking like a villain. Him having some resentment toward humans would be okay, but this is just stupid. \\
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* IzzyUneasy: That scene in ''Anime/TheBoyAndTheHeron'' where budgies crap all over Shoichi. It's not only disgusting(and rather unexpected from Studio Ghibli), it's also [[BigLippedAlligatorMoment absolutely pointless.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Alan Palgut: I enjoy ''WesternAnimation/AliceInWonderland1951'', but it's far from the perfect version thanks to the Doorknob – the film's only real CanonForeigner – whose presence I find completely pointless to the plot, mainly because he (it?) annoys Alice at the beginning and merely shows her as having "escaped" at the end, and if Joseph Kearns is pulling off a FakeBrit, [[OohMeAccentsSlipping he sucks at it]] while many of the other characters in the film are voiced by natural British people (e.g. Alice herself by Kathryn Beaumont, the Caterpillar by Richard Haydn) or by [[NotEvenBotheringWithTheAccent Americans who could have cared no less]] (e.g. the Mad Hatter by Ed Wynn, the Cheshire-Cat by Sterling Holloway). I would have said the same thing about the Tulgey Wood (despite being a canonical place in the poem "Jabberwocky") were it not an example of WhatCouldHaveBeen and had it not contained "Very Good Advice," the film's biggest TearJerker.

to:

* Alan Palgut: I enjoy ''WesternAnimation/AliceInWonderland1951'', but it's far from the perfect version thanks to the Doorknob – the film's only real CanonForeigner – whose presence I find completely pointless to the plot, mainly because he (it?) annoys Alice at the beginning and merely shows her as having "escaped" at the end, and if Joseph Kearns is pulling off a FakeBrit, [[OohMeAccentsSlipping he sucks at it]] while many of the other characters in the film are voiced by natural British people (e.g. Alice herself by Kathryn Beaumont, Creator/KathrynBeaumont, the Caterpillar by Richard Haydn) Creator/RichardHaydn) or by [[NotEvenBotheringWithTheAccent Americans who could have cared no less]] (e.g. the Mad Hatter by Ed Wynn, Creator/EdWynn, the Cheshire-Cat by Sterling Holloway).Creator/SterlingHolloway). I would have said the same thing about the Tulgey Wood (despite being a canonical place in the poem "Jabberwocky") were it not an example of WhatCouldHaveBeen and had it not contained "Very Good Advice," the film's biggest TearJerker.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Tropers/Loekman3: The beginning segment of ''WesternAnimation/Wish2023'' has like probably one of the biggest cases of TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodPlot in Disney's history and it's what tanked my initial hopes for the movie. Basically the opening premise is that Asha wants to study under King Magnifico so she can further contribute to Rosa's cause. The way they interacted at first actually gave me a very good impression of their hero/villain dynamic only for it to be squandered away when Asha realizes the King's intentions and the latter ultimately refuses her request not only by saying no but he also rub it in by granting someone else their wish, leaving Asha on her own to help fulfill their dreams. I get it, Magnifico is advertised to be a classical Disney villain not seen since Mother Gothel but you'd think that they would at least have Magnifico agree to take her in and add some segments of her working there or even say that she's has already worked with the King for some time and only then would he open his secret chamber to her. That would have flesh out their dynamic and makes the climax when the King gives in to his corrupted magic far more meaningful than what it is seen now.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** [=BossKey=]: This, so very much. So you’re telling me the ending to a series based around Vikings and dragons enriching each other’s lives through coexistence… ends with them severing ties forever. Doesn’t that make the whole series entirely pointless? ''WesternAnimation/HowToTrainYourDragonHomecoming'' doubles down on how bad of an ending it was, since the plot of that is based entirely around Hiccup’s decision causing the Berkians to become fearful and superstitious of dragons again, completely undoing years of cultural advancement and setting the Hooligan Tribe back to where they were before the first movie, and the situation is resolved by, surprise surprise, dragons coming back. [[DidntThinkThisThrough Releasing those dragons seems like a really stupid idea in hindsight, doesn’t it?]] (Addendum: [[Literature/HowToTrainYourDragon the books]] did this much better, with the setting generally being more grim than the LighterAndSofter movie adaptations and the split being more justified [[spoiler:due to Hiccup being their main peacekeeper and the split happening in his twilight years rather than in his prime]].

to:

** [=BossKey=]: This, so very much. So you’re telling me the ending to a series based around Vikings and dragons enriching each other’s lives through coexistence… ends with them severing ties forever. Doesn’t that make the whole series entirely pointless? ''WesternAnimation/HowToTrainYourDragonHomecoming'' doubles down on how bad of an ending it was, since the plot of that is based entirely around Hiccup’s decision causing the Berkians to become fearful and superstitious of dragons again, completely undoing years of cultural advancement and setting the Hooligan Tribe back to where they were before the first movie, and the situation is resolved by, surprise surprise, dragons coming back. [[DidntThinkThisThrough Releasing those dragons seems like a really stupid idea in hindsight, doesn’t it?]] (Addendum: [[Literature/HowToTrainYourDragon the books]] did this much better, with the setting generally being more grim than the LighterAndSofter movie adaptations and the split being more justified [[spoiler:due to Hiccup being their main peacekeeper and the split happening in his twilight years rather than in his prime]].)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** [=BossKey=]: This, so very much. So you’re telling me the ending to a series based around Vikings and dragons enriching each other’s lives through coexistence… ends with them severing ties forever. Doesn’t that make the whole series entirely pointless? ''WesternAnimation/HowToTrainYourDragonHomecoming'' doubles down on how bad of an ending it was, since the plot of that is based entirely around Hiccup’s decision causing the Berkians to become fearful and superstitious of dragons again, completely undoing years of cultural advancement and setting the Hooligan Tribe back to where they were before the first movie, and the situation is resolved by, surprise surprise, dragons coming back. [[DidntThinkThisThrough Releasing those dragons seems like a really stupid idea in hindsight, doesn’t it?]]

to:

** [=BossKey=]: This, so very much. So you’re telling me the ending to a series based around Vikings and dragons enriching each other’s lives through coexistence… ends with them severing ties forever. Doesn’t that make the whole series entirely pointless? ''WesternAnimation/HowToTrainYourDragonHomecoming'' doubles down on how bad of an ending it was, since the plot of that is based entirely around Hiccup’s decision causing the Berkians to become fearful and superstitious of dragons again, completely undoing years of cultural advancement and setting the Hooligan Tribe back to where they were before the first movie, and the situation is resolved by, surprise surprise, dragons coming back. [[DidntThinkThisThrough Releasing those dragons seems like a really stupid idea in hindsight, doesn’t it?]]it?]] (Addendum: [[Literature/HowToTrainYourDragon the books]] did this much better, with the setting generally being more grim than the LighterAndSofter movie adaptations and the split being more justified [[spoiler:due to Hiccup being their main peacekeeper and the split happening in his twilight years rather than in his prime]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Tropers/{{Retloclive}}: ''WesternAnimation/{{Trolls}}'' turned out to an okay film for something that looked like it was aimed at five year olds. However, one moment that's hard to overlook was Poppy just letting all the Troll refugees into Branch's bunker, which they go about eating everything in sight. Basically wrecking everything that Branch had prepared for years to keep himself safe from the Bergen. It's no different than a bunch of people eating all their limited food to the point of possibly starving only to then decide to go after and steal the food of the one person that actually rationed their share of the food, and leaving them with nothing like everyone else. Overall, it's such a horrible thing to do on Poppy's part, and no one calls her out on it.

to:

* Tropers/{{Retloclive}}: ''WesternAnimation/{{Trolls}}'' turned out to be an okay film for something that looked like it was aimed at five year olds. However, one moment that's hard to overlook was Poppy just letting all the Troll refugees into Branch's bunker, which they go about eating everything in sight. Basically wrecking everything that Branch had prepared for years to keep himself safe from the Bergen. It's no different than a bunch of people eating all their limited food to the point of possibly starving only to then decide to go after and steal the food of the one person that actually rationed their share of the food, and leaving them with nothing like everyone else. Overall, it's such a horrible thing to do on Poppy's part, and no one calls her out on it.

Added: 6134

Changed: 28

Removed: 4539

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[folder:Other Films]]

to:

[[folder:Other Films]][[folder: Dreamworks Animation]]






* Tropers/{{Clown-Face}}: ''WesternAnimation/TheEmojiMovie'' is an awful movie, and there is no shortage of moments that could qualify as its [=DMoS=], but for me, it's when Gene screws up and wrecks the text center early on. After spending the previous scene pleading to his parents to let him work on the phone for the first time so he can finally fit in, what does Gene do? He immediately, and with no provocation, freaks out and proceeds to make a mess of the text center, endangering everyone else there in the process. His actions go beyond that of a newbie making a mistake, making him look like an incompetent dumbass. What makes this such an EpicFail on the movie's part is that they try to make Gene out as a sympathetic {{woobie}} being treated unfairly for being "different" and paints his father Mel in the wrong for not believing in him, but all Gene does is prove their viewpoint correct. And what adds to this is that in the climax, Mel tells Gene that he was wrong for not believing in him, and what's meant to be a heartwarming moment is again ruined because, at this point, Gene has done nothing but continue to make matters even worse, as his actions have inadvertently caused Alex to try to delete the phone, and Gene has thus far done nothing to rectify this. So Mel's change of heart makes no sense because Gene has done nothing to show that Mel was wrong for not trusting him; if anything, he's just shown that Mel's earlier opinion of him was warranted.
** Tropers/{{Midna}}: ''WesternAnimation/TheEmojiMovie'' is a failure of a picture on almost every level, but one moment that particularly stands out to me as horrible is when Gene and his friends finally make it to the Cloud, and Gene becomes a "meh" like he always wanted, not because Jailbreak reprograms him... but because she friendzones him. Forget the fact that it's an incredibly cheap attempt to force some end-of-second-act drama—did the writers seriously not notice what an awful, self-centered prick it makes Gene look like?
* Tropers/KenyaStarflight: ''WesternAnimation/HotelTransylvania'' is a pretty good movie overall, but it hits a sour note for me with talk about a "zing" -- essentially the concept of LoveAtFirstSight -- and it's emphasized that you only get one "zing" in your life. A romantic enough notion, perhaps, but did the filmmakers think to consider how kids who come from divorced families might feel about this? Or really, has anyone who's had a relationship end, either by death, divorce, or breaking up? The movie doesn't even justify it by saying that "zing" only applies to monsters (granted, they do mention this [[WesternAnimation/HotelTransylvania3SummerVacation in the third movie]], but not everyone watches sequels), which might have made it a bit more tolerable -- basically the characters state you only get a single true love and that if you let them go, that's it. A cringe-worthy AccidentalAesop in an otherwise decent movie.



* Tropers/{{Flowerfun}}: While I did enjoy ''WesternAnimation/RubyGillmanTeenageKraken'', there's one part of the movie that after thinking about it rubs me the wrong way, that being Chelsie being a [[spoiler: TwistVillain and her not being Nerissa's daughter but being Nerissa herself.]] Not only does the twist [[TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodPlot waste what could have been an interesting conflict with her and Ruby trying to build peace between the two races]] and an [[TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodCharacter interesting character]], but it also ends up validating Gramama's FantasticRacism that all mermaids are evil, unintentionally sending a pro-racism message. There's also the EsotericHappyEnding where, although the villain has been defeated, the conflict between the mermaids and krakens goes completely unresolved.
* Tropers/{{Retloclive}}: ''WesternAnimation/{{Trolls}}'' turned out to an okay film for something that looked like it was aimed at five year olds. However, one moment that's hard to overlook was Poppy just letting all the Troll refugees into Branch's bunker, which they go about eating everything in sight. Basically wrecking everything that Branch had prepared for years to keep himself safe from the Bergen. It's no different than a bunch of people eating all their limited food to the point of possibly starving only to then decide to go after and steal the food of the one person that actually rationed their share of the food, and leaving them with nothing like everyone else. Overall, it's such a horrible thing to do on Poppy's part, and no one calls her out on it.
* Tropers/{{Thepenguinking2}}: I'll fully admit, ''WesternAnimation/{{Turbo}}'' is a guilty pleasure of mine. I'm not sure if I can say it's a good movie, but I enjoyed it unironically. It's probably my childlike excitement over seeing a movie about my favorite animal, and also [[EnsembleDarkhorse White Shadow]] was genuinely funny. But even then, I can't justify the scene where [[spoiler:Guy Gagne turns out to be the twist villain]]. Now, I'm not entirely against the idea of [[spoiler: Guy [[BitchInSheepsClothing being rotten on the inside]], but the logistics behind it are just dumb. Oh, so he seems like a nice guy in public, but after finding out a snail is racing, he decides to turn into an utter asshole with no regard for sportsmanship?]] Okay, sure, maybe [[spoiler:Guy only puts up the friendly façade while being recorded or in public meetups, but that's also kind of dumb. Don't you think someone, anyone, who works with him would come out and bring Guy's abusive nature to the public? This movie was released around the time when concerns for celebrities abusing their status was starting to rise, after all.]] What would've made more sense would be [[spoiler:[[AffablyEvil Guy genuinely being really good at hiding his true colors, even at work,]] but he fully exposes himself to Theo only at first, and then he would start truly revealing his cruelty once the presumably meaningless snail started actually winning]]. I'm probably putting my mind way more into this kid's film than I really should be, but it still does bother me a good bit.
[[/folder]]

[[folder:Other Films]]
* Tropers/{{Clown-Face}}: ''WesternAnimation/TheEmojiMovie'' is an awful movie, and there is no shortage of moments that could qualify as its [=DMoS=], but for me, it's when Gene screws up and wrecks the text center early on. After spending the previous scene pleading to his parents to let him work on the phone for the first time so he can finally fit in, what does Gene do? He immediately, and with no provocation, freaks out and proceeds to make a mess of the text center, endangering everyone else there in the process. His actions go beyond that of a newbie making a mistake, making him look like an incompetent dumbass. What makes this such an EpicFail on the movie's part is that they try to make Gene out as a sympathetic {{woobie}} being treated unfairly for being "different" and paints his father Mel in the wrong for not believing in him, but all Gene does is prove their viewpoint correct. And what adds to this is that in the climax, Mel tells Gene that he was wrong for not believing in him, and what's meant to be a heartwarming moment is again ruined because, at this point, Gene has done nothing but continue to make matters even worse, as his actions have inadvertently caused Alex to try to delete the phone, and Gene has thus far done nothing to rectify this. So Mel's change of heart makes no sense because Gene has done nothing to show that Mel was wrong for not trusting him; if anything, he's just shown that Mel's earlier opinion of him was warranted.
** Tropers/{{Midna}}: ''WesternAnimation/TheEmojiMovie'' is a failure of a picture on almost every level, but one moment that particularly stands out to me as horrible is when Gene and his friends finally make it to the Cloud, and Gene becomes a "meh" like he always wanted, not because Jailbreak reprograms him... but because she friendzones him. Forget the fact that it's an incredibly cheap attempt to force some end-of-second-act drama—did the writers seriously not notice what an awful, self-centered prick it makes Gene look like?
* Tropers/KenyaStarflight: ''WesternAnimation/HotelTransylvania'' is a pretty good movie overall, but it hits a sour note for me with talk about a "zing" -- essentially the concept of LoveAtFirstSight -- and it's emphasized that you only get one "zing" in your life. A romantic enough notion, perhaps, but did the filmmakers think to consider how kids who come from divorced families might feel about this? Or really, has anyone who's had a relationship end, either by death, divorce, or breaking up? The movie doesn't even justify it by saying that "zing" only applies to monsters (granted, they do mention this [[WesternAnimation/HotelTransylvania3SummerVacation in the third movie]], but not everyone watches sequels), which might have made it a bit more tolerable -- basically the characters state you only get a single true love and that if you let them go, that's it. A cringe-worthy AccidentalAesop in an otherwise decent movie.



* Tropers/{{Retloclive}}: ''WesternAnimation/{{Trolls}}'' turned out to an okay film for something that looked like it was aimed at five year olds. However, one moment that's hard to overlook was Poppy just letting all the Troll refugees into Branch's bunker, which they go about eating everything in sight. Basically wrecking everything that Branch had prepared for years to keep himself safe from the Bergen. It's no different than a bunch of people eating all their limited food to the point of possibly starving only to then decide to go after and steal the food of the one person that actually rationed their share of the food, and leaving them with nothing like everyone else. Overall, it's such a horrible thing to do on Poppy's part, and no one calls her out on it.



* Tropers/{{Flowerfun}}: While I did enjoy ''WesternAnimation/RubyGillmanTeenageKraken'', there's one part of the movie that after thinking about it rubs me the wrong way, that being Chelsie being a [[spoiler: TwistVillain and her not being Nerissa's daughter but being Nerissa herself.]] Not only does the twist [[TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodPlot waste what could have been an interesting conflict with her and Ruby trying to build peace between the two races]] and an [[TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodCharacter interesting character]], but it also ends up validating Gramama's FantasticRacism that all mermaids are evil, unintentionally sending a pro-racism message. There's also the EsotericHappyEnding where, although the villain has been defeated, the conflict between the mermaids and krakens goes completely unresolved.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Tropers/AlmightyKingPrawn: I've been a major animal nerd my whole life. I usually am able to immediately notice blatant cases of ArtisticLicenseBiology, but I typically just groan a little and still enjoy the movie. Two movies, however, have always bugged me on this. ''The Lion King'' is one such instance, despite otherwise being one of my favorites. Ever since I was a kid, I have been very mad at "I Just Can't Wait To Be King". Why? There are *sigh* giant anteaters on the big tower at the end. In the African savanna. [[MisplacedWildlife A South American animal]]. It's especially infuriating not only because the musical number makes some welcome obscure animal choices like sable antelope that indicate that they still did research despite this, but because Africa DOES have aardvarks, which, while so incredibly different looking that it is one of my pet peeves when people mix them up, is technically the African equivalent to an anteater, with the same long snoot and tongue. Therefore, they could have 100% used the animal that you would ACTUALLY find on the African savanna instead, and STILL gotten a component of the tower where the animals are all sticking out their long tongues.


Added DiffLines:

* Tropers/AlmightyKingPrawn: Remember how I said above in regards to ''The Lion King'' that there are two glaring cases of ArtisticLicenseBiology that have bugged me since childhood? Well ''WesternAnimation/FindingDory'' has the other. I was practically dumbfounded in the theater beholding the EsotericHappyEnding of Bailey the beluga escaping and going back to the Great Barrier Reef with the other characters. Belugas live in the Arctic Ocean, clearly much, much more freezing than a tropical reef. To stay warm, belugas have plenty of layers of thick blubber. [[FridgeHorror Bailey is going to die of heat exhaustion right in front of his friends within days, if not hours]]. It's also infuriating that the aquarium doesn't even go after him after this, when in reality not only would there be a lot of concern for the chance of death, but concern for the potential introduction of an invasive cetacean into Monterey Bay. If they wanted to not court controversy about captivity so bad, they could have at least had Bailey say goodbye to his friends upon noticing that things are getting really toasty and swim north.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** [=BossKey=]: This, so very much. So you’re telling me the ending to a series based around Vikings and dragons enriching each other’s lives through coexistence… ends with them severing ties forever. Doesn’t that make the whole series entirely pointless? ''WesternAnimation/HowToTrainYourDragonHomecoming'' doubles rown on how bad of an ending it was, since the plot of that is based entirely around Hiccup’s decision causing the Berkians to become fearful and superstitious of dragons again, completely undoing years of cultural advancement and setting the Hooligan Tribe back to where they were before the first movie, and the situation is resolved by, surprise surprise, dragons coming back. [[DidntThinkThisThrough Releasing those dragons seems like a really stupid idea in hindsight, doesn’t it?]]

to:

** [=BossKey=]: This, so very much. So you’re telling me the ending to a series based around Vikings and dragons enriching each other’s lives through coexistence… ends with them severing ties forever. Doesn’t that make the whole series entirely pointless? ''WesternAnimation/HowToTrainYourDragonHomecoming'' doubles rown down on how bad of an ending it was, since the plot of that is based entirely around Hiccup’s decision causing the Berkians to become fearful and superstitious of dragons again, completely undoing years of cultural advancement and setting the Hooligan Tribe back to where they were before the first movie, and the situation is resolved by, surprise surprise, dragons coming back. [[DidntThinkThisThrough Releasing those dragons seems like a really stupid idea in hindsight, doesn’t it?]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** [=BossKey=]: This, so very much. So you’re telling me the ending to a series based around Vikings and dragons enriching each other’s lives through coexistence… ends with them severing ties forever. Doesn’t that make the whole series entirely pointless? ''WesternAnimation/HowToTrainYourDragonHomecoming'' doubles rown on how bad of an ending it was, since the plot of that is based entirely around Hiccup’s decision causing the Berkians to become fearful and superstitious of dragons again, completely undoing years of cultural advancement and setting the Hooligan Tribe back to where they were before the first movie, and the situation is resolved by, surprise surprise, dragons coming back. [[DidntThinkThisThrough Releasing those dragons seems like a really stupid idea in hindsight, doesn’t it?]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Tropers/{{InsertCleverNameHere}}: Netflix's ''Marmaduke'' is so bad, you'd think picking a {{DMoS}} would be hard, but no. The entire "Marmaduke eats so much that ends up he shitting in a trophy" scene. Aside from being unfunny ToiletHumor, the scene uncomfortably feels like a writer's barely disguised fetish: Marmaduke gets a BalloonBelly (inflation), and he poops so much that it forms a massive cloud of gas (scat & farting). The whole thing was just so disgusting and drawn-out; I don't see how it was supposed to be funny.

to:

* Tropers/{{InsertCleverNameHere}}: Netflix's ''Marmaduke'' is so bad, you'd think picking a {{DMoS}} would be hard, but no. The entire "Marmaduke eats so much that he ends up he shitting in a trophy" scene. Aside from being unfunny ToiletHumor, the scene uncomfortably feels like a writer's barely disguised fetish: Marmaduke gets a BalloonBelly (inflation), and he poops so much that it forms a massive cloud of gas (scat & farting). The whole thing was just so disgusting and drawn-out; I don't see how it was supposed to be funny.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Stuff

Added DiffLines:

* Alan Palgut: ''The Return of Jafar'' is far from FirstInstallmentWins, but it's still one of the better [=DTV=] sequels -- an honour that usually goes to ''The King of Thieves'' or ''A Twist in Time''. It would have been much better, however, had Jafar not wasted Abis Mal's first two wishes. Altogether it wastes about ten seconds of both characters' time, and the scenes involving Jafar with the other characters are far better executed. I'll never get my third wish indeed.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Tropers/{{InsertCleverNameHere}}: Netflix's ''Marmaduke'' is so bad, you'd think picking a {{DMoS}} would be hard, but no. The entire "Marmaduke eats so much that ends up he shitting in a trophy" scene. Aside from being unfunny ToiletHumor, the scene uncomfortably feels like a writer's barely disguised fetish: Marmaduke gets a BalloonBelly (inflation), and he poops so much that it forms a massive cloud of gas (scat & farting). The whole thing was just so disgusting and drawn-out; I don't see how it was supposed to be funny.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

**Tropers/{{Thepenguinking2}}: I love ''A Bug's Life'' way more than most people out there do. But even I agree that the whole LiarRevealed scene is the one big low point of the movie. Like yeah, they're circus bugs, but [[HeartIsAnAwesomePower their wacky antics still prove to be very useful]] anyway! They saved Dot from the bird by playing live bait, and the fake bird is fully functional, so the fact that the ant colony just shoos them off because of this news and don't even try the bird is very questionable. What would've worked better is if P.T. Flea jumped in with the truth, the ant colony stands by them because of how much of a boon they've served, but P.T. just kidnaps the circus bugs anyway. Then Flik can leave out of shame of how he himself feels like he let the colony down, and the movie can go as normal from there. Actually, [[SugarWiki/BetterThanCanon that's how I'll see it actually going from now on, it's so much better!]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Tropers/{{Flowerfun}}: While I did enjoy ''WesternAnimation/RubyGillmanTeenageKraken'', there's one part of the movie that after thinking about it rubs me the wrong way, that being Chelsie being a TwistVillain and her not being Nerissa's daughter but being Nerissa herself. Not only does the twist [[TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodPlot waste what could have been an interesting conflict with her and Ruby trying to build peace between the two races]] and an [[TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodCharacter interesting character]], but it also ends up validating Gramama's FantasticRacism that all mermaids are evil, unintentionally sending a pro-racism message. There's also the EsotericHappyEnding where, although the villain has been defeated, the conflict between the mermaids and krakens goes completely unresolved.

to:

* Tropers/{{Flowerfun}}: While I did enjoy ''WesternAnimation/RubyGillmanTeenageKraken'', there's one part of the movie that after thinking about it rubs me the wrong way, that being Chelsie being a [[spoiler: TwistVillain and her not being Nerissa's daughter but being Nerissa herself. herself.]] Not only does the twist [[TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodPlot waste what could have been an interesting conflict with her and Ruby trying to build peace between the two races]] and an [[TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodCharacter interesting character]], but it also ends up validating Gramama's FantasticRacism that all mermaids are evil, unintentionally sending a pro-racism message. There's also the EsotericHappyEnding where, although the villain has been defeated, the conflict between the mermaids and krakens goes completely unresolved.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Tropers/{{Flowerfun}}: While I did enjoy ''WesternAnimation/RubyGillmanTeenageKraken'', there's one part of the movie that after thinking about it rubs me the wrong way, that being Chelsie being a TwistVillain and her not being Nerissa's daughter but being Nerissa herself. Not only does the twist [[TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodPlot waste what could have been an interesting conflict with her and Ruby trying to build peace between the two races]] and an [[TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodCharacter interesting character]], but it also ends up validating Gramama's FantasticRacism that all mermaids are evil, unintentionally sending a pro-racism message. There's also the EsotericHappyEnding where, although the villain has been defeated,the conflict between the mermaids and krakens goes completely unresolved.

to:

* Tropers/{{Flowerfun}}: While I did enjoy ''WesternAnimation/RubyGillmanTeenageKraken'', there's one part of the movie that after thinking about it rubs me the wrong way, that being Chelsie being a TwistVillain and her not being Nerissa's daughter but being Nerissa herself. Not only does the twist [[TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodPlot waste what could have been an interesting conflict with her and Ruby trying to build peace between the two races]] and an [[TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodCharacter interesting character]], but it also ends up validating Gramama's FantasticRacism that all mermaids are evil, unintentionally sending a pro-racism message. There's also the EsotericHappyEnding where, although the villain has been defeated,the defeated, the conflict between the mermaids and krakens goes completely unresolved.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Tropers/{{Flowerfun}}: While I did enjoy ''WesternAnimation/RubyGillmanTeenageKraken'', there's one part of the movie that after thinking about it rubs me the wrong way, that being Chelsie being a TwistVillain and her not being Nerissa's daughter but being Nerissa herself. Not only does the twist [[TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodPlot waste what could have been an interesting conflict with her and Ruby trying to build peace between the two races]] and an [[TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodCharacter interesting character]], but it also ends up validating Gramama's FantasticRacism that all Mermaids are evil, unintentionally sending a pro-racism message. There's also the EsotericHappyEnding where, although the villain has been defeated,the conflict between the Mermaids and Krakens goes completely unresolved.

to:

* Tropers/{{Flowerfun}}: While I did enjoy ''WesternAnimation/RubyGillmanTeenageKraken'', there's one part of the movie that after thinking about it rubs me the wrong way, that being Chelsie being a TwistVillain and her not being Nerissa's daughter but being Nerissa herself. Not only does the twist [[TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodPlot waste what could have been an interesting conflict with her and Ruby trying to build peace between the two races]] and an [[TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodCharacter interesting character]], but it also ends up validating Gramama's FantasticRacism that all Mermaids mermaids are evil, unintentionally sending a pro-racism message. There's also the EsotericHappyEnding where, although the villain has been defeated,the conflict between the Mermaids mermaids and Krakens krakens goes completely unresolved.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Tropers/{{Flowerfun}}: While I did enjoy ''WesternAnimation/RubyGillmanTeenageKraken'', there's one part of the movie that after thinking about it rubs me the wrong way, that being Chelsie being a TwistVillain and her not being Nerissa's daughter but being Nerissa herself. Not only does the twist [[TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodPlot waste what could have been an interesting conflict with her and Ruby trying to build peace between the two races]] and an [[TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodCharacter interesting character]], but it also ends up validating Gramama's FantasticRacism that all Mermaids are evil, unintentionally sending a pro-racism message. There's also the EsotericHappyEnding where, although the villain has been defeated,the conflict between the Mermaids and Krakens goes completely unresolved.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Change


* Alan Palgut: I enjoy the 1951 version of ''Alice in Wonderland'', but it's far from the perfect version thanks to the Doorknob – the film's only real CanonForeigner – whose pesence at the beginning and end I find completely pointless to the plot, and if Joseph Kearns is pulling off a FakeBrit, [[OohMeAccentsSlipping he sucks at it]] while many of the other characters in the film are voiced by natural British people (e.g. Alice herself by Kathryn Beaumont, the Caterpillar by Richard Haydn) or by [[NotEvenBotheringWithTheAccent Americans who could have cared no less]] (e.g. the Mad Hatter by Ed Wynn, the Cheshire-Cat by Sterling Holloway). I would have said the same thing about the Tulgey Wood (despite being a canonical place in the poem "Jabberwocky") were it not an example of WhatCouldHaveBeen and had it not contained "Very Good Advice," the film's biggest TearJerker.

to:

* Alan Palgut: I enjoy the 1951 version of ''Alice in Wonderland'', ''WesternAnimation/AliceInWonderland1951'', but it's far from the perfect version thanks to the Doorknob – the film's only real CanonForeigner – whose pesence at the beginning and end presence I find completely pointless to the plot, mainly because he (it?) annoys Alice at the beginning and merely shows her as having "escaped" at the end, and if Joseph Kearns is pulling off a FakeBrit, [[OohMeAccentsSlipping he sucks at it]] while many of the other characters in the film are voiced by natural British people (e.g. Alice herself by Kathryn Beaumont, the Caterpillar by Richard Haydn) or by [[NotEvenBotheringWithTheAccent Americans who could have cared no less]] (e.g. the Mad Hatter by Ed Wynn, the Cheshire-Cat by Sterling Holloway). I would have said the same thing about the Tulgey Wood (despite being a canonical place in the poem "Jabberwocky") were it not an example of WhatCouldHaveBeen and had it not contained "Very Good Advice," the film's biggest TearJerker.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Change


* Alan Palgut: I enjoy the 1951 version of ''Alice in Wonderland'', but it's far from the perfect version thanks to the Doorknob – the film's only real CanonForeigner – who I find completely pointless to the plot, and if Joseph Kearns is pulling off a FakeBrit, [[OohMeAccentsSlipping he sucks at it]] while many of the other characters in are voiced by natural British people (e.g. Alice herself by Kathryn Beaumont, the Caterpillar by Richard Haydn) or by [[NotEvenBotheringWithTheAccent Americans who could have cared no less]] (e.g. the Mad Hatter by Ed Wynn, the Cheshire-Cat by Sterling Holloway). I would have said the same thing about the Tulgey Wood (despite being a canonical place in the poem "Jabberwocky") were it not an example of WhatCouldHaveBeen and had it not contained "Very Good Advice," the film's biggest TearJerker.

to:

* Alan Palgut: I enjoy the 1951 version of ''Alice in Wonderland'', but it's far from the perfect version thanks to the Doorknob – the film's only real CanonForeigner – who whose pesence at the beginning and end I find completely pointless to the plot, and if Joseph Kearns is pulling off a FakeBrit, [[OohMeAccentsSlipping he sucks at it]] while many of the other characters in the film are voiced by natural British people (e.g. Alice herself by Kathryn Beaumont, the Caterpillar by Richard Haydn) or by [[NotEvenBotheringWithTheAccent Americans who could have cared no less]] (e.g. the Mad Hatter by Ed Wynn, the Cheshire-Cat by Sterling Holloway). I would have said the same thing about the Tulgey Wood (despite being a canonical place in the poem "Jabberwocky") were it not an example of WhatCouldHaveBeen and had it not contained "Very Good Advice," the film's biggest TearJerker.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Stuff

Added DiffLines:

* Alan Palgut: I enjoy the 1951 version of ''Alice in Wonderland'', but it's far from the perfect version thanks to the Doorknob – the film's only real CanonForeigner – who I find completely pointless to the plot, and if Joseph Kearns is pulling off a FakeBrit, [[OohMeAccentsSlipping he sucks at it]] while many of the other characters in are voiced by natural British people (e.g. Alice herself by Kathryn Beaumont, the Caterpillar by Richard Haydn) or by [[NotEvenBotheringWithTheAccent Americans who could have cared no less]] (e.g. the Mad Hatter by Ed Wynn, the Cheshire-Cat by Sterling Holloway). I would have said the same thing about the Tulgey Wood (despite being a canonical place in the poem "Jabberwocky") were it not an example of WhatCouldHaveBeen and had it not contained "Very Good Advice," the film's biggest TearJerker.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Tropers/{{KoopaKid17}}: The very beginning of ''WesternAnimation/{{Lightyear}}'', where I'm expected to believe that a movie I'm just being introduced to is responsible for Andy wanting a Buzz Lightyear for his birthday. [[BluntNo No]]. Everybody saw first-hand exactly why anyone, even Sid of all people, would want a Buzz Lightyear in the first ''Toy Story''. This cool toy glows in the dark, has light-activated lasers, his helmet and wings retract, etc. This movie does no such thing, instead relying on a few lines of text to try to convince its audience how Andy got won over. If this truly was the movie that Andy saw, it's more likely that he'd have fallen asleep in the theater because of how boring it was. Come on, Pixar. You're better than committing one of the biggest violations of ShowDontTell in cinematic history.

to:

* Tropers/{{KoopaKid17}}: The very beginning of ''WesternAnimation/{{Lightyear}}'', where I'm expected to believe that a movie I'm just being introduced to is responsible for Andy wanting a Buzz Lightyear for his birthday. [[BluntNo No]]. Everybody saw first-hand exactly why anyone, even Sid of all people, would want a Buzz Lightyear in the first ''Toy Story''. This cool toy glows in the dark, has light-activated lasers, his helmet and wings retract, etc. This movie does no such thing, instead relying on a few lines of text to try to convince its audience how Andy got won over. If this truly was the movie that Andy saw, it's more likely that he'd have fallen asleep in the theater because of how boring it was. Come on, Pixar. You're better than committing one of the biggest violations of ShowDontTell in cinematic history.

Added: 832

Removed: 832

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Tropers/{{KoopaKid17}}: The very beginning of ''WesternAnimation/{{Lightyear}}'', where I'm expected to believe that a movie I'm just being introduced to is responsible for Andy wanting a Buzz Lightyear for his birthday. [[BluntNo No]]. Everybody saw first-hand exactly why anyone, even Sid of all people, would want a Buzz Lightyear in the first ''Toy Story''. This cool toy glows in the dark, has light-activated lasers, his helmet and wings retract, etc. This movie does no such thing, instead relying on a few lines of text to try to convince its audience how Andy got won over. If this truly was the movie that Andy saw, it's more likely that he'd have fallen asleep in the theater because of how boring it was. Come on, Pixar. You're better than committing one of the biggest violations of ShowDontTell in cinematic history.



* Tropers/{{KoopaKid17}}: The very beginning of ''WesternAnimation/{{Lightyear}}'', where I'm expected to believe that a movie I'm just being introduced to is responsible for Andy wanting a Buzz Lightyear for his birthday. [[BluntNo No]]. Everybody saw first-hand exactly why anyone, even Sid of all people, would want a Buzz Lightyear in the first ''Toy Story''. This cool toy glows in the dark, has light-activated lasers, his helmet and wings retract, etc. This movie does no such thing, instead relying on a few lines of text to try to convince its audience how Andy got won over. If this truly was the movie that Andy saw, it's more likely that he'd have fallen asleep in the theater because of how boring it was. Come on, Pixar. You're better than committing one of the biggest violations of ShowDontTell in cinematic history.

Top