Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1,2 (click to see context) from:
So SugarWiki/{{Sooty}} the chimney sweep wants to make a better world, eh? Well remember, sometimes the soot from the chimney gets into your lung, collects in a layer of black muck, blocks the oxygen absorption and causes you to suffocate even in the fresh air.
to:
So SugarWiki/{{Sooty}} the chimney sweep wants to make a better world, eh? Well remember, sometimes the soot from the chimney gets into your lung, lungs, collects in a layer of black muck, blocks the oxygen absorption and causes you to suffocate even in the fresh air.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Spelling/grammar fix
Changed line(s) 3,4 (click to see context) from:
Oh, that's not a {{Dissimile}}. Honestly, sometimes we try to fix things and we end up choking on the fall out. So what we have to do is remember what doesn't work and what attempts failed. Then we can use that to make better choices next time and EarnYourHappyEnding.
to:
Oh, that's not a {{Dissimile}}. Honestly, sometimes we try to fix things and we end up choking on the fall out.fallout. So what we have to do is remember what doesn't work and what attempts failed. Then we can use that to make better choices next time and EarnYourHappyEnding.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Dewick...
Changed line(s) 9 (click to see context) from:
* Tried to cut list CafeAuLaitSkin because it didn't have any examples. Didn't go through when others have before. Probably linked to the fact that previous pages were on dodgy ground when it came to the trope anyway so they really needed the examples. This one seemed more reasonable ''but'' how accurate is the description when considering the trope that actually occurs? How well is the trope doing if it has no examples? Why is the name chosen to be the same as a completely unrelated dermatological condition?
to:
* Tried to cut list CafeAuLaitSkin [=CafeAuLaitSkin=], a redirect to StarbucksSkinScale, because it didn't have any examples. Didn't go through when others have before. Probably linked to the fact that previous pages were on dodgy ground when it came to the trope anyway so they really needed the examples. This one seemed more reasonable ''but'' how accurate is the description when considering the trope that actually occurs? How well is the trope doing if it has no examples? Why is the name chosen to be the same as a completely unrelated dermatological condition?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
I did it!
** Done.
Changed line(s) 31,32 (click to see context) from:
----
<<|TheContributors|>>
<<|TheContributors|>>
to:
<<|TheContributors|>>
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Well, adding this one certainly isn\'t helping in that endeavour. Darth Wiki/ is not immune from the ban on links to HONF instead of ordinary NF.
Changed line(s) 26 (click to see context) from:
* This troper has been trying to delete the remaining HighOctaneNightmareFuel links. After all, the button just redirects to NightmareFuel now.
to:
* This troper has been trying to delete the remaining HighOctaneNightmareFuel High Octane Nightmare Fuel links. After all, the button just redirects to NightmareFuel now.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
*This troper has been trying to delete the remaining HighOctaneNightmareFuel links. After all, the button just redirects to NightmareFuel now.
