Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Trope was cut/disambiguated due to cleanup
Changed line(s) 136 (click to see context) from:
--> '''Hasan:''' It's too open, it's too free. Mr J.T., I went, to customs, and they were like "What are you here to do?" and I'm like "I am here to roast Prime Minister Justin Trudeau. And do you know what the guy said? "[[CanadaEh Have a nice day.]]"
to:
--> '''Hasan:''' It's too open, it's too free. Mr J.T., I went, to customs, and they were like "What are you here to do?" and I'm like "I am here to roast Prime Minister Justin Trudeau. And do you know what the guy said? "[[CanadaEh "[[CourteousCanadian Have a nice day.]]"
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 249 (click to see context) from:
-->'''Trevor:''' Trump is simply exploiting something we've all known about politics; half of it is performance. But what Donald Trump either doesn't get or doesn't care about is that the other half is governance. When most politicians performs, it's a means to an end. You get the crowd on your side so that you can govern. Trump only wants to govern so that he can have the crowd on his side.
to:
-->'''Trevor:''' Trump is simply exploiting something we've all known about politics; half of it is performance. But what Donald Trump either doesn't get or doesn't care about is that the other half is governance. When most politicians performs, perform, it's a means to an end. You get the crowd on your side so that you can govern. Trump only wants to govern so that he can have the crowd on his side.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 249 (click to see context) from:
-->'''Trevor:''' Trump is simply exploiting something we've always known about politics; half of it is performance. But what Donald Trump either doesn't know or doesn't care about is that the other half is governance. When a politician performs, it's always a means to an end. You get the crowd on your side so that you can govern. Trump only wants to govern so that he can have the crowd on his side.
to:
-->'''Trevor:''' Trump is simply exploiting something we've always all known about politics; half of it is performance. But what Donald Trump either doesn't know get or doesn't care about is that the other half is governance. When a politician most politicians performs, it's always a means to an end. You get the crowd on your side so that you can govern. Trump only wants to govern so that he can have the crowd on his side.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 249 (click to see context) from:
'''Trevor:''' Trump is simply exploiting something we've always known about politics; half of it is performance. But what Donald Trump either doesn't know or doesn't care about is that the other half is governance. When a politician performs, it's always a means to an end. You get the crowd on your side so that you can govern. Trump only wants to govern so that he can have the crowd on his side.
to:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* August 24: When examining how Trump wildly changes his persona depending on the audience, Trevor makes an astute observation.
'''Trevor:''' Trump is simply exploiting something we've always known about politics; half of it is performance. But what Donald Trump either doesn't know or doesn't care about is that the other half is governance. When a politician performs, it's always a means to an end. You get the crowd on your side so that you can govern. Trump only wants to govern so that he can have the crowd on his side.
'''Trevor:''' Trump is simply exploiting something we've always known about politics; half of it is performance. But what Donald Trump either doesn't know or doesn't care about is that the other half is governance. When a politician performs, it's always a means to an end. You get the crowd on your side so that you can govern. Trump only wants to govern so that he can have the crowd on his side.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
No meta moment, see this query
.
.Deleted line(s) 287,292 (click to see context) :
!!Meta
* Creator/HasanMinhaj rips into Congress about [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NUymQKZqP6w gun control]] and [[http://www.people.com/article/hasan-minhaj-tells-people-why-he-has-no-regrets it is glorious]].
-->'''Hasan''': I just wanted to keep it intellectually honest and I wanted to keep all my jokes just about policy. That's what we've learned at the Daily Show is to write to our highest level of intellect. I'm not going to go after people's families or their personal lives. I'm going after 'Hey, this is what we have paid you to do as our representatives.'
* April 29, 2017: Creator/HasanMinhaj follows in Creator/StephenColbert and Creator/LarryWilmore's footsteps by hosting the White House Correspondents Dinner. Although Trump skipped the dinner, [[https://youtu.be/Z7oG74nHSTQ Hasan still showed audacity in skewering both Trump and mainstream media]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* September 21: After NFL quarterback Colin Kaepernick started kneeling in protest of police brutality against Black people, Trump demanded that the NFL fire other players following Kaepernick's example. However, Trevor points out that no form of protest by Black people is "acceptable" to conservatives.
-->'''Trevor:''' [[Literature/GreenEggsAndHam It’s wrong to do it in the streets; It’s wrong to do it in the tweets; You cannot do it on the field; You cannot do it if you’ve kneeled; And don’t do it if you’re rich, you ungrateful son of a bitch. Because there’s one thing that’s a fact: You cannot protest if you’re black.]]
-->'''Trevor:''' [[Literature/GreenEggsAndHam It’s wrong to do it in the streets; It’s wrong to do it in the tweets; You cannot do it on the field; You cannot do it if you’ve kneeled; And don’t do it if you’re rich, you ungrateful son of a bitch. Because there’s one thing that’s a fact: You cannot protest if you’re black.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Changed line(s) 212 (click to see context) from:
* October 20th: Roy Wood, Jr. examines the aversion of AngryBlackMan trope in [[http://www.cc.com/video-clips/mmr1rj/the-daily-show-with-trevor-noah-black-eye-on-america---the-struggles-of-african-american-journalists black journalists]], where they're forcing themselves to maintain their composure in the face of the increasing ludicrous statements made to their faces.
to:
* October 20th: Roy Wood, Jr. examines the aversion of AngryBlackMan trope AngryBlackManStereotype in [[http://www.cc.com/video-clips/mmr1rj/the-daily-show-with-trevor-noah-black-eye-on-america---the-struggles-of-african-american-journalists black journalists]], where they're forcing themselves to maintain their composure in the face of the increasing ludicrous statements made to their faces.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 282 (click to see context) from:
* June 29: Trevor [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1AlTP-ttMFE talks about how complicated the topic abortion is]], post the overturning of ''Roe v. Wade'' by the US Supreme Court. He points out that it's more nuanced beyond the phrases "pro-life" and "pro-choice", that even contraceptives aren't 100% effective, and how "then don't have sex" is completely meaningless. In a slight Awesome Moment, he proposes how the citizens could call on the bluff of every single Republican to write a retro-active law on punishing ever person who has had an abortion, rightly pointing out that a high number of ''Republican'' law makers whose mistresses or someone they've been seeing have hypocritically ''gotten abortions'' at some point, ''in spite'' of their own anti-abortion stances and various strict anti-abortion restrictions prior to ''Roe'' being overturned.
to:
* June 29: Trevor [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1AlTP-ttMFE talks about how complicated the topic abortion is]], post the overturning of ''Roe v. Wade'' by the US Supreme Court. He points out that it's more nuanced beyond the phrases "pro-life" and "pro-choice", that even contraceptives aren't 100% effective, and how "then don't have sex" is completely meaningless. In a slight Awesome Moment, he proposes how the citizens constituents could call on the bluff of every single Republican to write a retro-active law on punishing ever every person who has had an abortion, rightly pointing out that a high number of ''Republican'' law makers whose mistresses or someone they've been seeing have hypocritically ''gotten abortions'' at some point, ''in spite'' of their own anti-abortion stances and various strict anti-abortion restrictions prior to ''Roe'' being overturned.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 282 (click to see context) from:
* June 29: Trevor [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1AlTP-ttMFE talks about how complicated the topic abortion is]], post the overturning of ''Roe. v. Wade'' by the US Supreme Court. He points out that it's more nuanced beyond the phrases "pro-life" and "pro-choice", that even contraceptives aren't 100% effective, and how "then don't have sex" is completely meaningless. In a slight Awesome Moment, he proposes how the citizens could call on the bluff of every single Republican to write a retro-active law on punishing ever person who has had an abortion, rightly pointing out that a high number of ''Republican'' law makers whose mistresses or someone they've been seeing have ''gotten abortions'' at some point, ''in spite'' of their own anti-abortion stances and various strict anti-abortion restrictions prior to ''Roe'' being overturned.
to:
* June 29: Trevor [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1AlTP-ttMFE talks about how complicated the topic abortion is]], post the overturning of ''Roe. ''Roe v. Wade'' by the US Supreme Court. He points out that it's more nuanced beyond the phrases "pro-life" and "pro-choice", that even contraceptives aren't 100% effective, and how "then don't have sex" is completely meaningless. In a slight Awesome Moment, he proposes how the citizens could call on the bluff of every single Republican to write a retro-active law on punishing ever person who has had an abortion, rightly pointing out that a high number of ''Republican'' law makers whose mistresses or someone they've been seeing have hypocritically ''gotten abortions'' at some point, ''in spite'' of their own anti-abortion stances and various strict anti-abortion restrictions prior to ''Roe'' being overturned.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* June 29: Trevor [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1AlTP-ttMFE talks about how complicated the topic abortion is]], post the overturning of ''Roe. v. Wade'' by the US Supreme Court. He points out that it's more nuanced beyond the phrases "pro-life" and "pro-choice", that even contraceptives aren't 100% effective, and how "then don't have sex" is completely meaningless. In a slight Awesome Moment, he proposes how the citizens could call on the bluff of every single Republican to write a retro-active law on punishing ever person who has had an abortion, rightly pointing out that a high number of ''Republican'' law makers whose mistresses or someone they've been seeing have ''gotten abortions'' at some point, ''in spite'' of their own anti-abortion stances and various strict anti-abortion restrictions prior to ''Roe'' being overturned.
-->'''Trevor:''' Because we've seen time and time again. They'll have a mistress, they'll have a woman they're seeing, they'll have somebody, and all of a sudden- "Oh, pro-life. Oh, no. I didn't mean it like that. Oh, this was an exceptional cir- Oh, no, this is the devil." No, there's only one devil in this conversation, and it's ''you''.
-->'''Trevor:''' Because we've seen time and time again. They'll have a mistress, they'll have a woman they're seeing, they'll have somebody, and all of a sudden- "Oh, pro-life. Oh, no. I didn't mean it like that. Oh, this was an exceptional cir- Oh, no, this is the devil." No, there's only one devil in this conversation, and it's ''you''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 279 (click to see context) from:
* March 1: Trevor rebukes the racist language used by mainstream media while speaking of the Ukrainian refugee crisis emerging from Russia's invasion of the country, with one reporter saying "[[UnfortunateImplications This is a relatively civilized, relatively European -- I have to choose those words carefully too -- city where you wouldn't expect that or hope that it's going to happen]].". Trevor also points out that [[DoubleStandard these news networks along with many other European governments weren't showing any compassion towards refugees from other non-European countries]].
to:
* March 1: Trevor rebukes the racist language used by mainstream media while speaking of the Ukrainian refugee crisis emerging from Russia's invasion of the country, with one reporter saying "[[UnfortunateImplications This is a relatively civilized, relatively European -- I have to choose those words carefully too -- city where you wouldn't expect that or hope that it's going to happen]].". Trevor also points out that [[DoubleStandard these news networks along with many other European governments weren't showing any this compassion towards refugees from other non-European countries]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 280 (click to see context) from:
-->'''Trevor:''' Wow, that was you choosing your words carefully? That was the careful version? What were you going to say if you ''weren't'' choosing your words carefully? [[SarcasmMode I just hope the next time this happens, it happens back in the Middle East where it belongs]].
to:
-->'''Trevor:''' Wow, that was you choosing your words carefully? That was the careful version? What were you going to say if you ''weren't'' choosing your words carefully? [[SarcasmMode I "I just hope the next time this happens, it happens back in the Middle East where it belongs]].belongs."]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 279 (click to see context) from:
* March 1: Trevor rebukes the racist language used by mainstream media while speaking of the Ukrainian refugee crisis emerging from Russia's invasion of the country, with one reporter saying "[[UnfortunateImplications This is a relatively civilized, relatively European -- I have to choose those words carefully too -- city where you wouldn't expect that or hope that it's going to happen]].". Trevor also points out that these news networks along with many other European governments weren't showing any compassion towards refugees from other non-European countries.
to:
* March 1: Trevor rebukes the racist language used by mainstream media while speaking of the Ukrainian refugee crisis emerging from Russia's invasion of the country, with one reporter saying "[[UnfortunateImplications This is a relatively civilized, relatively European -- I have to choose those words carefully too -- city where you wouldn't expect that or hope that it's going to happen]].". Trevor also points out that [[DoubleStandard these news networks along with many other European governments weren't showing any compassion towards refugees from other non-European countries.countries]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* March 1: Trevor rebukes the racist language used by mainstream media while speaking of the Ukrainian refugee crisis emerging from Russia's invasion of the country, with one reporter saying "[[UnfortunateImplications This is a relatively civilized, relatively European -- I have to choose those words carefully too -- city where you wouldn't expect that or hope that it's going to happen]].". Trevor also points out that these news networks along with many other European governments weren't showing any compassion towards refugees from other non-European countries.
-->'''Trevor:''' Wow, that was you choosing your words carefully? That was the careful version? What were you going to say if you ''weren't'' choosing your words carefully? [[SarcasmMode I just hope the next time this happens, it happens back in the Middle East where it belongs]].
-->When it's Syrians who are fleeing a war, it's all, 'We do not have space, do not come.' But now there's space and people must come? What changed? I understand the arguments that these countries will make, that they have to think about how easy it is for refugees to integrate into their culture and society, I get that. I truly get that. It's just like it's easier for you to take in a family member who's in trouble than a random person who needs help... But it doesn't mean it's impossible. And the problem I have is that when it's Syrians or Africans on a boat, these countries didn't even try to integrate them. They didn't even say 'women and children only.' No, they reject even the chance that anyone brown could assimilate.
-->'''Trevor:''' Wow, that was you choosing your words carefully? That was the careful version? What were you going to say if you ''weren't'' choosing your words carefully? [[SarcasmMode I just hope the next time this happens, it happens back in the Middle East where it belongs]].
-->When it's Syrians who are fleeing a war, it's all, 'We do not have space, do not come.' But now there's space and people must come? What changed? I understand the arguments that these countries will make, that they have to think about how easy it is for refugees to integrate into their culture and society, I get that. I truly get that. It's just like it's easier for you to take in a family member who's in trouble than a random person who needs help... But it doesn't mean it's impossible. And the problem I have is that when it's Syrians or Africans on a boat, these countries didn't even try to integrate them. They didn't even say 'women and children only.' No, they reject even the chance that anyone brown could assimilate.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 279,280 (click to see context) from:
[[/golder]]
to:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 265 (click to see context) from:
[[folder: 2020]]
to:
Changed line(s) 269 (click to see context) from:
[[folder: 2021]]
to:
Added DiffLines:
[[folder:2022]]
[[/golder]]
[[/golder]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 135 (click to see context) from:
--> '''Trudeau:''' [[SomeAnvilsNeedToBeDropped North America was built by people fleeing persecution, conflicts, wars, trying to build a better life for themselves and their families]].
to:
--> '''Trudeau:''' [[SomeAnvilsNeedToBeDropped North America was built by people fleeing persecution, conflicts, wars, trying to build a better life for themselves and their families]].families.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Not So Different has been renamed, and it needs to be dewicked/moved
Changed line(s) 34 (click to see context) from:
** Trevor and Hasan Minhaj's [[http://www.vulture.com/2015/12/daily-show-takes-on-trumps-white-isis.html takedown]] of Donald Trump's inflammatory remarks about Muslims, with Hasan commenting that he only agrees because Muslims are ''in'' danger, especially from the likes of "racist maniacs" like Trump. They both come to the dawning realization in analyzing Trump's remarks that he is NotSoDifferent from ISIL, dubbing him "White ISIS."
to:
** Trevor and Hasan Minhaj's [[http://www.vulture.com/2015/12/daily-show-takes-on-trumps-white-isis.html takedown]] of Donald Trump's inflammatory remarks about Muslims, with Hasan commenting that he only agrees because Muslims are ''in'' danger, especially from the likes of "racist maniacs" like Trump. They both come to the dawning realization in analyzing Trump's remarks that he is NotSoDifferent isn't so different from ISIL, dubbing him "White ISIS."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 193 (click to see context) from:
** Ronny Chieng [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rX8jZTN0CdU angrily]] rips into an incredibly racist Fox News segment on New York's Chinatown.
to:
** Ronny Chieng [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rX8jZTN0CdU angrily]] rips into an incredibly racist Fox News segment on New York's Chinatown.Chinatown, where then ''The O'Reilly Factor'' correspondent Jesse Watters intentionally interviewed older Chinese people who don't understand English or politics, as well as... Ronny will explain below:
Changed line(s) 195 (click to see context) from:
** He then heads into Chinatown himself and asks bystanders on the election and then the racist video:
to:
** He then heads into Chinatown himself and asks bystanders on the election and then the racist video:video, not only conversing with them in Mandarin and Cantonese, but revealing that the Chinese people he talks to not only know English, but are also well-versed in the intricacies of American politics and American-Chinese relations. Leading to this epic conversation, entirely in English:
Changed line(s) 197 (click to see context) from:
'''Bystander:''' The chickenshit reporter who came down and thought he was being hot shit because he talked to people who couldn’t speak English?\\
to:
'''Bystander:''' The chickenshit reporter who came down here and thought he was being hot shit because he talked to people who couldn’t speak English?\\
Changed line(s) 199 (click to see context) from:
'''Bystander:''' The one who was sent here by the larger chickenshit who couldn’t come to Chinatown because he was afraid to do it himself? That one?\\
to:
'''Bystander:''' The one who was sent here by the larger chickenshit (Bill O'Reilly) who couldn’t come to Chinatown because he was afraid to do it himself? That one?\\
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
[[folder: 2021]]
* He had this to say about the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict with the recent events from his [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NeZ4yXyzUG0 humane take on it]]. He points out how Israel has one of the strongest militaries in the world and can crush Gaza in an instant. He uses his personal experience with his younger brothers in regards to asking these questions in regards to having the power to do something about it.
-->"If you are in a fight where the other person cannot beat you, how hard should you retaliate when they try to hurt you?"
** Pointing out the imbalance of power between the two sides with this quesiton.
-->“If a man has a knife, should the cops shoot him?”
** Then this most important question in regards to having enough power to show responsibility.
-->“Everyone has a different answer to the question, and I’m not trying to answer the question, nor do I think I’m smart enough to solve it. All I’m asking is, when you have this much power, what is your responsibility?”
[[/folder]]
* He had this to say about the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict with the recent events from his [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NeZ4yXyzUG0 humane take on it]]. He points out how Israel has one of the strongest militaries in the world and can crush Gaza in an instant. He uses his personal experience with his younger brothers in regards to asking these questions in regards to having the power to do something about it.
-->"If you are in a fight where the other person cannot beat you, how hard should you retaliate when they try to hurt you?"
** Pointing out the imbalance of power between the two sides with this quesiton.
-->“If a man has a knife, should the cops shoot him?”
** Then this most important question in regards to having enough power to show responsibility.
-->“Everyone has a different answer to the question, and I’m not trying to answer the question, nor do I think I’m smart enough to solve it. All I’m asking is, when you have this much power, what is your responsibility?”
[[/folder]]
