Follow TV Tropes

Following

History ArtisticLicensePaleontology / LiveActionFilms

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''[[Film/OneMIllionYearsBC One Million Years B.C.]]'' is the TropeNamer for the trope OneMillionBC for a good reason. The film features creatures from [[AnachronismStew many prehistoric eras]], most of them much older than 1 million years. The humans are all {{Nubile Savage}}s, including a FurBikini-clad, well-groomed Creator/RaquelWelch. Some creatures, like the giant turtle ''Archelon'', are vastly oversized, whereas others, like the kangaroo-stance ''Allosaurus'' (pictured above) are ''undersized, standing only slightly taller than a human (in real life, even the smallest ''Allosaurus'' would stand about a foot and a half taller than an average-sized human being). And let's not get started on the [[PteroSoarer scaly, bat-winged, grasping-footed pterosaurs]]...

to:

* ''[[Film/OneMIllionYearsBC One Million Years B.C.]]'' is the TropeNamer for the trope OneMillionBC for a good reason. The film features creatures from [[AnachronismStew many prehistoric eras]], most of them much older than 1 million years. The humans are all {{Nubile Savage}}s, including a FurBikini-clad, well-groomed Creator/RaquelWelch. Some creatures, like the giant turtle ''Archelon'', are vastly oversized, whereas others, like the kangaroo-stance ''Allosaurus'' (pictured above) are ''undersized, ''undersized'', standing only slightly taller than a human (in real life, even the smallest ''Allosaurus'' would stand about a foot and a half taller than an average-sized human being). And let's not get started on the [[PteroSoarer scaly, bat-winged, grasping-footed pterosaurs]]...
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''[[Film/OneMIllionYearsBC One Million Years B.C.]]'', pictured above, features a kangaroo-stance ''Allosaurus'' that stands only slightly taller than a human. In real life, even the smallest ''Allosaurus'' would stand about a foot and a half taller than an average-sized human being. (Also, assuming the title of the film is accurate, dinosaurs would have gone extinct some 64,000,000 years ago.)

to:

* ''[[Film/OneMIllionYearsBC One Million Years B.C.]]'', pictured above, ]]'' is the TropeNamer for the trope OneMillionBC for a good reason. The film features creatures from [[AnachronismStew many prehistoric eras]], most of them much older than 1 million years. The humans are all {{Nubile Savage}}s, including a FurBikini-clad, well-groomed Creator/RaquelWelch. Some creatures, like the giant turtle ''Archelon'', are vastly oversized, whereas others, like the kangaroo-stance ''Allosaurus'' that stands (pictured above) are ''undersized, standing only slightly taller than a human. In human (in real life, even the smallest ''Allosaurus'' would stand about a foot and a half taller than an average-sized human being. (Also, assuming being). And let's not get started on the title of the film is accurate, dinosaurs would have gone extinct some 64,000,000 years ago.)[[PteroSoarer scaly, bat-winged, grasping-footed pterosaurs]]...
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Caption was somewhat fitting for Prehistoric Monster, but not here.


[[caption-width-right:350:Would ''Allosaurus'' have any hope to become [[SarcasmMode the new WWF icon?]]]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The page image for PrehistoricMonster, taken from ''[[Film/OneMIllionYearsBC One Million Years B.C.]]'', depicts a kangaroo-stance ''Allosaurus'' that stands only slightly taller than the humans in the picture. In real life, even the smallest ''Allosaurus'' would stand about a foot and a half taller than an average-sized human being. (Also, assuming the title of the film is accurate, dinosaurs would have gone extinct some 64,000,000 years ago.)

to:

* The page image for PrehistoricMonster, taken from ''[[Film/OneMIllionYearsBC One Million Years B.C.]]'', depicts pictured above, features a kangaroo-stance ''Allosaurus'' that stands only slightly taller than the humans in the picture.a human. In real life, even the smallest ''Allosaurus'' would stand about a foot and a half taller than an average-sized human being. (Also, assuming the title of the film is accurate, dinosaurs would have gone extinct some 64,000,000 years ago.)
Willbyr MOD

Added: 407

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

%% Image moved to this page per Image Pickin' thread: https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=1602862496090032000
%% Please do not replace or remove without starting a new thread.
%%
[[quoteright:350:[[Film/OneMillionYearsBC https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/allosaurus3_9.png]]]]
[[caption-width-right:350:Would ''Allosaurus'' have any hope to become [[SarcasmMode the new WWF icon?]]]]
%%
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Among the less-talked about howling scientific errors in ''Film/{{Lucy}}'' comes when Professor Norman states that Lucy is the name of "the first woman." This is apparently a reference to an Australopithecus fossil discovered in the 1970s, named "Lucy" by paleontologists after the Beatles song. While it is one of the earliest known female hominids, calling it “the first woman” is a laughable misunderstanding that no scientist of Norman’s supposed caliber would ever make. To begin with, the phrase itself is scientifically almost meaningless, since the evolution of humans was very gradual, and there simply never was any individual creature that could be definitively called the first human (male or female). But putting that aside for the moment, fossils are nothing more than random snapshots in time (only a tiny percentage of earth's organisms are ever preserved as fossils), and today’s scientists have no way of knowing that any particular fossil they happen to find is literally the first member of a species, even if they ''could'' state with certainty that it's the oldest fossil from that species in existence today.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Irrelevant natter


*** Modern North Texas doesn't look as dry [[TelevisionGeography as in the film]], either. Not even ''West'' Texas does.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** There's also the entire idea of a race of intelligent dinosaur-descendants looking ''exactly like humans'', not with standing the very fact that there are even dinosaurs at all given that the original Koopas were ''turtles''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** The first time we see Grant and Sattler is at a dig in Montana uncovering a ''Velociraptor'' skeleton, which never existed anywhere near there. What's more, the skeleton is still assembled correctly, even though most fossils are found with the bones scattered all over the place.

to:

*** The first time we see Grant and Sattler is at a dig in Montana uncovering a ''Velociraptor'' skeleton, which never existed anywhere near there. What's more, the skeleton is still assembled correctly, even though most fossils are found with the bones scattered all over the place. There's a reason for this, though: the ''Velociraptors'' in the ''Jurassic Park'' franchise are actually based on ''Deinonychus'', which ''did'' live in Montana.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** Alan Grant refers to the dinosaurs made by [=InGen=] as "Genetically engineered theme park mutants", pointing out that [=InGen=] deliberately made their dinosaurs to be more awesome than real dinosaurs just for the crowds, and that anything learnt about real dinosaurs from them would be distorted.
** ''Film/JurassicWorld'': This film retroactively justifies all instances with the park dinosaurs when Dr. Wu reminds Masrani that his and the team's orders were to engineer the animals based on RuleOfCool, not scientific accuracy.

to:

*** Alan Grant refers to the dinosaurs made by [=InGen=] as "Genetically engineered theme park mutants", monsters", pointing out that [=InGen=] deliberately made their dinosaurs to be more awesome than real dinosaurs just for the crowds, and that anything learnt about real dinosaurs from them would be distorted.
** ''Film/JurassicWorld'': This film retroactively justifies all instances with the park dinosaurs when Dr. Wu reminds Masrani that his and the team's orders were to engineer the animals based on RuleOfCool, not scientific accuracy.accuracy (more-or-less echoing Dr. Grant's argument above).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** ''Film/JurassicWorld'': This film retroactively justifies all instances with the park dinosaurs when Dr. Wu reminds Masrani that his and the team's orders were to engineer the animals based on RuleOfCool, not scientific accuracy.
--->'''Wu:''' Nothing in Jurassic World in natural. We have always filled gaps in the genome with the DNA of other animals. And, if their genetic code was pure, many of them would look quite different. But you didn't ask for reality. You asked for more teeth.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In the comedy ''Film/BringingUpBaby'', one of the main subplots involves paleontologist Actor/CaryGrant retrieving a missing dinosaur bone with the help of ManicPixieDreamGirl Actor/KatherineHepburn. The bone in question is described as an "Intercostal clavicle". There is no such thing as an "intercostal clavical". Intercostal means "between the ribs" and the clavicle is a collar bone.

to:

* In the comedy ''Film/BringingUpBaby'', one of the main subplots involves paleontologist Actor/CaryGrant Creator/CaryGrant retrieving a missing dinosaur bone with the help of ManicPixieDreamGirl Actor/KatherineHepburn.Creator/KatherineHepburn. The bone in question is described as an "Intercostal clavicle". There is no such thing as an "intercostal clavical". Intercostal means "between the ribs" and the clavicle is a collar bone.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** There is one thing Toho got right, probably by coincidence: Godzilla (as well as his pre-mutated form Godzillasaurus) is often portrayed with his hands facing inwards, which is now known to be the normal position for theropods.

to:

** There is one thing Toho got right, probably by coincidence: Godzilla (as well as his pre-mutated form Godzillasaurus) is often portrayed with his hands facing inwards, which is now known to be the normal position for theropods.theropods and other bipedal dinosaurs.

Added: 964

Changed: 2142

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''Franchise/JurassicPark'': film-only issues include the ''Dilophosaurus'' being too small and having a retractable frill (for the practical purpose of distinguishing them from the ''Velociraptors'', which themselves look more like ''Deinonychuses'' or ''Utahraptors''), and repeatedly misspelling the dinosaurs' names... though technically, they're "genetically-engineered" based on reptile and amphibian DNA; their resemblance to real dinosaurs is purely superficial.
** The first time we see Grant and Sattler is at a dig in Montana uncovering a ''Velociraptor'' skeleton, which never existed anywhere near there. What's more, the skeleton is still assembled correctly, even though most fossils are found with the bones scattered all over the place.
* In ''Film/JurassicParkIII'', ''Pteranodon'' (literally "toothless wing") are given tooth-filled beaks, grasping feet, and [[KidnappingBirdOfPrey the ability to pick up a grown man that had to outweigh them by a good fifty pounds at least]]. Meanwhile, the raptors are "smarter than primates".
** While the ''Spinosaurus'' was indeed bigger than the ''T. rex'', it would never have been able to take one on in a fight. A ''rex's'' heavy jaws and thick teeth were built for crushing bone while a ''Spinosaurus's'' thin jaws and teeth were better suited for hunting fish. The first time the ''rex'' clamped down on its slim bony neck should have crippled it, if not outright decapitated it.
** Alan Grant refers to the dinosaurs made by [=InGen=] as "Genetically engineered theme park mutants", pointing out that [=InGen=] deliberately made their dinosaurs to be more awesome than real dinosaurs just for the crowds, and that anything learnt about real dinosaurs from them would be distorted.

to:

* ''Franchise/JurassicPark'': film-only ''Franchise/JurassicPark'':
** ''Film/JurassicPark'':
*** Film-only
issues include the ''Dilophosaurus'' being too small and having a retractable frill (for the practical purpose of distinguishing them from the ''Velociraptors'', which themselves look more like ''Deinonychuses'' or ''Utahraptors''), and repeatedly misspelling the dinosaurs' names... though technically, they're "genetically-engineered" based on reptile and amphibian DNA; their resemblance to real dinosaurs is purely superficial.
** *** The first time we see Grant and Sattler is at a dig in Montana uncovering a ''Velociraptor'' skeleton, which never existed anywhere near there. What's more, the skeleton is still assembled correctly, even though most fossils are found with the bones scattered all over the place.
* In ''Film/JurassicParkIII'', ** ''Film/JurassicParkIII'':
***
''Pteranodon'' (literally "toothless wing") are given tooth-filled beaks, grasping feet, and [[KidnappingBirdOfPrey the ability to pick up a grown man that had to outweigh them by a good fifty pounds at least]]. Meanwhile, the raptors are "smarter than primates".
** *** While the ''Spinosaurus'' was indeed bigger than the ''T. rex'', it would never have been able to take one on in a fight. A ''rex's'' heavy jaws and thick teeth were built for crushing bone while a ''Spinosaurus's'' thin jaws and teeth were better suited for hunting fish. The first time the ''rex'' clamped down on its slim bony neck should have crippled it, if not outright decapitated it.
** *** Alan Grant refers to the dinosaurs made by [=InGen=] as "Genetically engineered theme park mutants", pointing out that [=InGen=] deliberately made their dinosaurs to be more awesome than real dinosaurs just for the crowds, and that anything learnt about real dinosaurs from them would be distorted.

Changed: 156

Removed: 305

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The [[Film/SyFyChannelOriginalMovie Sci-Fi Channel Original Movie]] (which should give you a hint as to its quality) ''100 Million BC'' has the humans unable to detect the rampaging ''Giganotosaurus'' through a heat sensor because "dinosaurs are ectothermal" (sic). Even if ''Giganotosaurus'' was an ectotherm, its body temperature and metabolism by sheer virtue of its size would be like that of an endotherm (due to a little thing called inertial homeothermy). It ''would'' have showed up on a thermal sensor.
** Also, the heroes visit South America 70 million years ago (despite the fact it's 100 Million BC...) and ''Gigantosaurus'' became extinct around 90 million years ago. Somewhere, a palaeontologist is facepalming.
** Nevermind an ectothermic animal is one that can't ''produce'' its own internal heat. It doesn't mean it can't accumulate heat from its environment and be warm as a result. As any introductory book to Biology would say, a lizard that has been basking under the sun for hours will be warmer than a mouse.

to:

* The [[Film/SyFyChannelOriginalMovie Sci-Fi Channel Original Movie]] (which should give you a hint as to its quality) ''100 Million BC'' has the humans unable to detect the rampaging ''Giganotosaurus'' through a heat sensor because "dinosaurs are ectothermal" (sic). Even if ''Giganotosaurus'' was an ectotherm, its an animal that size would have a much higher body temperature and metabolism than its environment by sheer virtue of its size would be like that of an endotherm (due to a little thing called inertial homeothermy).gigantothermy. It ''would'' have showed up on a thermal sensor.
** Also, the heroes visit South America 70 million years ago (despite the fact it's 100 Million BC...) and ''Gigantosaurus'' ''Giganotosaurus'' became extinct around 90 million years ago. Somewhere, a palaeontologist is facepalming.
** Nevermind an ectothermic animal is one that can't ''produce'' its own internal heat. It doesn't mean it can't accumulate heat from its environment and be warm as a result. As any introductory book to Biology would say, a lizard that has been basking under the sun for hours will be warmer than a mouse.
facepalming.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Subverted with the ''Franchise/{{Godzilla}}'' films in that Toho doesn't even ''try'' to ''pretend'' to be remotely accurate in any way whatsoever.

to:

* Subverted with the Toho's ''Franchise/{{Godzilla}}'' films in that Toho doesn't try to get around this by not even ''try'' ''trying'' to ''pretend'' to be remotely accurate in any way whatsoever.



** There is one thing Toho got right: Godzilla (as well as his pre-mutated form Godzillasaurus) is often portrayed with his hands facing inwards, just like a real theropod.

to:

** There is one thing Toho got right: right, probably by coincidence: Godzilla (as well as his pre-mutated form Godzillasaurus) is often portrayed with his hands facing inwards, just like a real theropod.which is now known to be the normal position for theropods.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The film ''Alpha'' takes place 20k years ago and is a "Boy and His Dog" story, except the "dog" is actually a wolf. It tells a fictionalized tale of the origin of dogs. Alas, real wolves [[AllAnimalsAreDogs not dogs]] and [[AllAnimalsAreDomesticated aren't tame]]. Wolf domestication isn't as easy as a human just bonding with an unusually tame wolf.

to:

** The film ''Alpha'' takes place 20k 20,000 years ago and is a "Boy and His Dog" story, except the "dog" is actually a wolf. It tells a fictionalized tale of the origin of dogs. Alas, real wolves [[AllAnimalsAreDogs are not dogs]] and [[AllAnimalsAreDomesticated aren't tame]]. Wolf domestication isn't as easy as a human just bonding with an unusually tame wolf.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** ''Alpha'' features a sabertooth cat that looks like a ''Smilodon'' as indicated by its size. But it should have a short bobcat-like tail instead of the long tiger-like one it has in the film, not to mention that [[MisplacedWildlife none of the three species were found in Europe]]. Alternatively, it could be a ''Machairodus'', which was just as large and actually did live in Europe - except that the last members of this genus [[AnachronismStew died out during the middle Pleistocene]], millennia before the film's time period of 20,000 years ago.

to:

** ''Alpha'' features a sabertooth cat that looks like a ''Smilodon'' as indicated by its size. But it should have a short bobcat-like tail instead of the long tiger-like one it has in the film, not to mention that [[MisplacedWildlife none of the three species were found in Europe]]. Alternatively, it could be a ''Machairodus'', which was just as large and actually did live in Europe - except that the last members of this genus [[AnachronismStew died out during the middle Pleistocene]], millennia before the film's time period of 20,000 years ago. The visual effects supervisor confirmed it was a cave lion, which actually did live in Europe 20,000 years ago, but it certainly didn't have those long canines.

Added: 905

Changed: 541

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''Film/Alpha2018'' features a sabertooth cat that looks like a ''Smilodon'' as indicated by its size. But it should have a short bobcat-like tail instead of the long tiger-like one it has in the film, not to mention that [[MisplacedWildlife none of the three species were found in Europe]]. Alternatively, it could be a ''Machairodus'', which was just as large and actually did live in Europe - except that the last members of this genus [[AnachronismStew died out during the middle Pleistocene]], millennia before the film's time period of 20,000 years ago.

to:

* ''Film/Alpha2018'' ''Film/Alpha2018'':
** ''Alpha''
features a sabertooth cat that looks like a ''Smilodon'' as indicated by its size. But it should have a short bobcat-like tail instead of the long tiger-like one it has in the film, not to mention that [[MisplacedWildlife none of the three species were found in Europe]]. Alternatively, it could be a ''Machairodus'', which was just as large and actually did live in Europe - except that the last members of this genus [[AnachronismStew died out during the middle Pleistocene]], millennia before the film's time period of 20,000 years ago.ago.
** The film ''Alpha'' takes place 20k years ago and is a "Boy and His Dog" story, except the "dog" is actually a wolf. It tells a fictionalized tale of the origin of dogs. Alas, real wolves [[AllAnimalsAreDogs not dogs]] and [[AllAnimalsAreDomesticated aren't tame]]. Wolf domestication isn't as easy as a human just bonding with an unusually tame wolf.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The dinosaur in question is called a ''Brontosaurus''. Even at the time the film was made, the scientific community would have called it ''Apatosaurus''.

to:

** The dinosaur in question is called a ''Brontosaurus''. Even at the time the film was made, the scientific community would have called it ''Apatosaurus''.''Apatosaurus''.
* ''Film/Alpha2018'' features a sabertooth cat that looks like a ''Smilodon'' as indicated by its size. But it should have a short bobcat-like tail instead of the long tiger-like one it has in the film, not to mention that [[MisplacedWildlife none of the three species were found in Europe]]. Alternatively, it could be a ''Machairodus'', which was just as large and actually did live in Europe - except that the last members of this genus [[AnachronismStew died out during the middle Pleistocene]], millennia before the film's time period of 20,000 years ago.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Also, the heroes visit South America 70 million years ago (despite the fact it's 100 Million BC...) and ''Gigantosaurus'' became extinct around 90 million years ago.

to:

** Also, the heroes visit South America 70 million years ago (despite the fact it's 100 Million BC...) and ''Gigantosaurus'' became extinct around 90 million years ago. Somewhere, a palaeontologist is facepalming.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** A case can however be made for the first movie, ''Film/{{Gojira}}'', which ''was'' to be taken seriously. In it, a paleontologist deduces that the titular monster hails form the Jurassic period by finding a trilobite in one of its footprints. Trilobites died out about 50 million years before that period, but this can be {{hand wave}}d, given that in the movie's universe, prehistoric creatures still exist in modern times. The true error is that the supposed paleontologist places the Jurassic at 2 million years BC. He's off by about 150 million years. Even in 1954, scientists knew a ''lot''better than this. And yes, there ''was'' serious paleontology done in Japan. He also states that mammals evolved during the Cretaceous from marine reptiles, which is completely wrong.

to:

** A case can however be made for the first movie, ''Film/{{Gojira}}'', which ''was'' to be taken seriously. In it, a paleontologist deduces that the titular monster hails form the Jurassic period by finding a trilobite in one of its footprints. Trilobites died out about 50 million years before that period, but this can be {{hand wave}}d, given that in the movie's universe, prehistoric creatures still exist in modern times. The true error is that the supposed paleontologist places the Jurassic at 2 million years BC. He's off by about 150 million years. Even in 1954, scientists knew a ''lot''better ''lot'' better than this. And yes, there ''was'' serious paleontology done in Japan. He also states that mammals evolved during the Cretaceous from marine reptiles, which is completely wrong.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** A case can however be made for the first movie, ''Film/{{Gojira}}'', which ''was'' to be taken seriously. In it, a paleontologist deduces that the titular monster hails form the Jurassic period by finding a trilobite in one of its footprints. Trilobites died out about 50 million years before that period, but this can be {{hand wave}}d, given that in the movie's universe, prehistoric creatures still exist in modern times. The true error is that the supposed paleontologist places the Jurassic at 2 million years BC. He's off by about 150 million years. Even in 1954, scientists knew a lot better than this. And yes, there was serious paleontology done in Japan. He also states that mammals evolved during the Cretaceous from marine reptiles, which is completely wrong.

to:

** A case can however be made for the first movie, ''Film/{{Gojira}}'', which ''was'' to be taken seriously. In it, a paleontologist deduces that the titular monster hails form the Jurassic period by finding a trilobite in one of its footprints. Trilobites died out about 50 million years before that period, but this can be {{hand wave}}d, given that in the movie's universe, prehistoric creatures still exist in modern times. The true error is that the supposed paleontologist places the Jurassic at 2 million years BC. He's off by about 150 million years. Even in 1954, scientists knew a lot better ''lot''better than this. And yes, there was ''was'' serious paleontology done in Japan. He also states that mammals evolved during the Cretaceous from marine reptiles, which is completely wrong.



*** In the beginning when hunting the mammoths; they refer to the head of the herd as the "Lead Bull", meaning that the leader of the herd is male. All indications are that mammoths behaved very similarly to modern elephants... who are led by matriarch females. The males travel separately from the herd.

to:

*** In the beginning when hunting the mammoths; they refer to the head of the herd as the "Lead Bull", meaning that the leader of the herd is male. All indications are that mammoths behaved very similarly to modern elephants... who ''who are led by matriarch females.females''. The males travel separately from the herd.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The [[SyFyChannelOriginalMovie Sci-Fi Channel Original Movie]] (which should give you a hint as to its quality) ''100 Million BC'' has the humans unable to detect the rampaging ''Giganotosaurus'' through a heat sensor because "dinosaurs are ectothermal" (sic). Even if ''Giganotosaurus'' was an ectotherm, its body temperature and metabolism by sheer virtue of its size would be like that of an endotherm (due to a little thing called inertial homeothermy). It ''would'' have showed up on a thermal sensor.

to:

* The [[SyFyChannelOriginalMovie [[Film/SyFyChannelOriginalMovie Sci-Fi Channel Original Movie]] (which should give you a hint as to its quality) ''100 Million BC'' has the humans unable to detect the rampaging ''Giganotosaurus'' through a heat sensor because "dinosaurs are ectothermal" (sic). Even if ''Giganotosaurus'' was an ectotherm, its body temperature and metabolism by sheer virtue of its size would be like that of an endotherm (due to a little thing called inertial homeothermy). It ''would'' have showed up on a thermal sensor.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''Franchise/JurassicPark'': film-only issues include the ''Dilophosaurus'' being too small and having a retractable frill (for the practical purpose of distinguishing them from the ''Velociraptors'', which themselves look more like Deinonychuses or Utahraptors), and repeatedly misspelling the dinosaurs' names... though technically, they're "genetically-engineered" based on reptile and amphibian DNA; their resemblance to real dinosaurs is purely superficial.

to:

* ''Franchise/JurassicPark'': film-only issues include the ''Dilophosaurus'' being too small and having a retractable frill (for the practical purpose of distinguishing them from the ''Velociraptors'', which themselves look more like Deinonychuses ''Deinonychuses'' or Utahraptors), ''Utahraptors''), and repeatedly misspelling the dinosaurs' names... though technically, they're "genetically-engineered" based on reptile and amphibian DNA; their resemblance to real dinosaurs is purely superficial.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''Franchise/JurassicPark'': film-only issues include the ''Dilophosaurus'' being too small and having a retractable frill (for the practical purpose of distinguishing them from the ''Velociraptors''), and repeatedly misspelling the dinosaurs' names... though technically, they're "genetically-engineered" based on reptile and amphibian DNA; their resemblance to real dinosaurs is purely superficial.

to:

* ''Franchise/JurassicPark'': film-only issues include the ''Dilophosaurus'' being too small and having a retractable frill (for the practical purpose of distinguishing them from the ''Velociraptors''), ''Velociraptors'', which themselves look more like Deinonychuses or Utahraptors), and repeatedly misspelling the dinosaurs' names... though technically, they're "genetically-engineered" based on reptile and amphibian DNA; their resemblance to real dinosaurs is purely superficial.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


::Ironically, as [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paleocene%E2%80%93Eocene_Thermal_Maximum That Other Wiki]] points out, the climate in the epochs immediately following the K-T extinction was substantially ''warmer''.

to:

::Ironically, **Ironically, as [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paleocene%E2%80%93Eocene_Thermal_Maximum That Other Wiki]] points out, the climate in the epochs immediately following the K-T extinction was substantially ''warmer''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* In ''Film/{{Noah}}'', a lizard-dog is presented as an example of an animal that could have escaped the fossil record due to being lost in the flood.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** A case can however be made for the first movie, ''Film/{{Gojira}}'', which ''was'' to be taken seriously. In it, a paleontologist deduces that the titular monster hails form the Jurassic period by finding a trilobite in one of its footprints. Trilobites died out about 50 million years before that period, but this can be {{hand wave}}d, given that in the movie's universe, prehistoric creatures still exist in modern times. The true error is that the supposed paleontologist places the Jurassic at 2 million years BC. He's off by about 150 million years. Even in 1954, scientists knew a lot better than this. And yes, there was serious paleontology done in Japan.

to:

** A case can however be made for the first movie, ''Film/{{Gojira}}'', which ''was'' to be taken seriously. In it, a paleontologist deduces that the titular monster hails form the Jurassic period by finding a trilobite in one of its footprints. Trilobites died out about 50 million years before that period, but this can be {{hand wave}}d, given that in the movie's universe, prehistoric creatures still exist in modern times. The true error is that the supposed paleontologist places the Jurassic at 2 million years BC. He's off by about 150 million years. Even in 1954, scientists knew a lot better than this. And yes, there was serious paleontology done in Japan. He also states that mammals evolved during the Cretaceous from marine reptiles, which is completely wrong.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Parodied in ''Film/{{Caveman}}''. Yes, there are cavemen and dinosaurs in the same film, but few scientists would be able to cry for the laughter. Not only does the movie occur "One Zillion Years Ago", but the main dinosaur seen in the movie is a geriatric ''T. rex'' that is alternately denied delectable cavewoman meat, stoned off a burning cannabis plant, and [[GroinAttack fondled and then smacked where it counts]] by a blind caveman (note that dinosaurs would have their goolies internal, like everything other than mammals does). The other prehistoric creatures include a pteranodon which has its (10ft long! Ouch!) egg stolen and a stop-motion creature resembling some outlandish {{Slurpasaur}}.
* The original ''Film/KingKong1933'' and its sequel ''Film/TheSonOfKong'' feature many prehistoric animals portrayed as overly aggressive carnivores even if they were herbivorous (''Apatosaurus'', ''Styracosaurus'', and ''Stegosaurus'', to name a few) and one dramatically oversized pterodactyl to help ruin the image of its eponymous, misunderstood ape.
* Creator/PeterJackson's remake does the same, with the justification that they have been evolving the whole time and it's pure coincidence they look like popular depictions (but some don't, like the ''Ferrucutus'' or the ''Atercurisaurus''). They even came out with a tie-in book exploring the unique fauna of the island -- which shows the usual errors like the lack of any plumage on any non-avian dinosaurs - even the ''birds'' seem to have as little feathers as possible, pronated hands, live birth etc.; as well as many non-dinosaurian biological impossibilities.
* Subverted with the ''Franchise/{{Godzilla}}'' films in that Toho doesn't even ''try'' to ''pretend'' to be remotely accurate in any way whatsoever.
** A case can however be made for the first movie, ''Film/{{Gojira}}'', which ''was'' to be taken seriously. In it, a paleontologist deduces that the titular monster hails form the Jurassic period by finding a trilobite in one of its footprints. Trilobites died out about 50 million years before that period, but this can be {{hand wave}}d, given that in the movie's universe, prehistoric creatures still exist in modern times. The true error is that the supposed paleontologist places the Jurassic at 2 million years BC. He's off by about 150 million years. Even in 1954, scientists knew a lot better than this. And yes, there was serious paleontology done in Japan.
** There is one thing Toho got right: Godzilla (as well as his pre-mutated form Godzillasaurus) is often portrayed with his hands facing inwards, just like a real theropod.
** Paleontological accuracy was actually discussed behind the scenes during the production of the second generation of Godzilla films. Special effects director Koichi Kawakita suggested redesigning Godzilla into a more realistic dinosaur in tune with 90s science, an idea that producer Tomoyuki Tanaka angrily shot down, arguing that he's supposed to be a monster. Some critics take the somewhat more realistic-looking Godzillasaurus' transformation into the highly unrealistic, upright Godzilla as the studio declaring their stance on the matter, making it clear that he's unrealistic on purpose.
* Somewhere a paleoanthropologist and an archaeologist are crying: in ''Film/TheXFilesFightTheFuture'' movie, we see a Neanderthal in North Texas 60,000 years ago. Not only were there no Neanderthals in the Western Hemisphere ''ever'', there is strong dispute about whether there were hominids of any kind in the Western Hemisphere 60,000 years ago. Maybe they were all abducted by aliens?
** Ice Age Texas also probably would not have looked anything like that scene depicted it as. The Ice Age glaciers [[http://www.esd.ornl.gov/projects/qen/nercNORTHAMERICA.html never got anywhere near that far south]].
*** Modern North Texas doesn't look as dry [[TelevisionGeography as in the film]], either. Not even ''West'' Texas does.
* '' Film/TenThousandBC'': An AndroclesLion type situation with a ''Smilodon''. "Terror Birds" about 2 million years after they went extinct.[[note]]Though, we should at least be grateful that Creator/RolandEmmerich didn't use a ''Deinonychus'' or ''Utahraptor''.[[/note]] And woolly mammoths being used to move bricks to build the Pyramids in Ancient Egypt. RuleOfCool taken to the very limit.
** Neither ''Smilodon'' (clearly the species/genus being represented on film[[note]]Though either the main character is really small, or [[BiggerIsBetter this particular cat]] has gigantism[[/note]]) nor "Terror Birds" ever lived in Africa. Both animals were restricted to North and South America. Then again, [[ArtisticLicenseGeography given how the characters seem to WALK from South America to Africa]]...
*** In the beginning when hunting the mammoths; they refer to the head of the herd as the "Lead Bull", meaning that the leader of the herd is male. All indications are that mammoths behaved very similarly to modern elephants... who are led by matriarch females. The males travel separately from the herd.
*** It would seem that sometimes [[ScienceMarchesOn Science Marches Backwards]]. A partial specimen of what appears to be a small relative of the terror birds was recently discovered in North Africa. So that one "mistake" might not be ''as'' wrong as it seemed at the time... if we ignore that it lived several million years before the beginning of mankind anyway.
* The [[SyFyChannelOriginalMovie Sci-Fi Channel Original Movie]] (which should give you a hint as to its quality) ''100 Million BC'' has the humans unable to detect the rampaging ''Giganotosaurus'' through a heat sensor because "dinosaurs are ectothermal" (sic). Even if ''Giganotosaurus'' was an ectotherm, its body temperature and metabolism by sheer virtue of its size would be like that of an endotherm (due to a little thing called inertial homeothermy). It ''would'' have showed up on a thermal sensor.
** Also, the heroes visit South America 70 million years ago (despite the fact it's 100 Million BC...) and ''Gigantosaurus'' became extinct around 90 million years ago.
** Nevermind an ectothermic animal is one that can't ''produce'' its own internal heat. It doesn't mean it can't accumulate heat from its environment and be warm as a result. As any introductory book to Biology would say, a lizard that has been basking under the sun for hours will be warmer than a mouse.
* ''Franchise/JurassicPark'': film-only issues include the ''Dilophosaurus'' being too small and having a retractable frill (for the practical purpose of distinguishing them from the ''Velociraptors''), and repeatedly misspelling the dinosaurs' names... though technically, they're "genetically-engineered" based on reptile and amphibian DNA; their resemblance to real dinosaurs is purely superficial.
** The first time we see Grant and Sattler is at a dig in Montana uncovering a ''Velociraptor'' skeleton, which never existed anywhere near there. What's more, the skeleton is still assembled correctly, even though most fossils are found with the bones scattered all over the place.
* In ''Film/JurassicParkIII'', ''Pteranodon'' (literally "toothless wing") are given tooth-filled beaks, grasping feet, and [[KidnappingBirdOfPrey the ability to pick up a grown man that had to outweigh them by a good fifty pounds at least]]. Meanwhile, the raptors are "smarter than primates".
** While the ''Spinosaurus'' was indeed bigger than the ''T. rex'', it would never have been able to take one on in a fight. A ''rex's'' heavy jaws and thick teeth were built for crushing bone while a ''Spinosaurus's'' thin jaws and teeth were better suited for hunting fish. The first time the ''rex'' clamped down on its slim bony neck should have crippled it, if not outright decapitated it.
** Alan Grant refers to the dinosaurs made by [=InGen=] as "Genetically engineered theme park mutants", pointing out that [=InGen=] deliberately made their dinosaurs to be more awesome than real dinosaurs just for the crowds, and that anything learnt about real dinosaurs from them would be distorted.
* ''[[Film/SuperMarioBros Super Mario Bros. The Movie]]'' hits a few common dinosaur-related errors, though the filmmakers seemed to be going for RuleOfCool. These include:
** The meteorite that caused the extinction of the dinosaurs is implied to have done so immediately, while also hitting Earth where present-day New York City is located. To be fair, this was before the actual location of the meteorite's impact and its affect were commonly known or proven.
** The humanoid dinosaurs in the parallel world, such as Koopa and Lena, display qualities and behaviors more typical of modern lizards, such as tongue-flicking and prehensile tongue-use. However, it is implied that the dino-humans developed these traits over time as they became more like modern reptiles, while the prehensile tongue-use was taken from the games (Yoshi).
* Pioneering filmmaker Creator/DWGriffith's 1914 film ''Brute Force'' shows a group of cavemen attacked by a dinosaur.
* A throw-away line of dialogue from '' Film/PumaMan'':
-->So dinosaurs became extinct because they no longer knew how to love each other?
* In ''Film/BatmanAndRobin'', Mr. Freeze knows ''[[IncrediblyLamePun absolute zero]]'' about what killed the dinosaurs.
-->'''Freeze''': ''The Ice Age!''
::Ironically, as [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paleocene%E2%80%93Eocene_Thermal_Maximum That Other Wiki]] points out, the climate in the epochs immediately following the K-T extinction was substantially ''warmer''.
* The main villain of ''Film/DevilFish'' is a mutated ''Dunkleosteus''/octopus hybrid. In the movie, [[MixAndMatchCritters ignoring]] [[LEGOGenetics the obvious issues]], ''Dunkleosteus'' is described as a prehistoric [[ThreateningShark shark]]. Real ''Dunkleosteus'' were members of a now-extinct family, the Anthrodira, which left no surviving descendants and was only distantly related to sharks. They also claimed that the pliosaur ''Kronosaurus'' ''[[CriticalResearchFailure was a shark]]'' that lived during the "Cetaceous period" [sic], which was about 200 years ago (the 1770s?). Another fish that they describe as a prehistoric shark is a very modern, harmless basking shark.
* The 1960 movie ''Dinosaurus!'' featured the discovery and unintentional revival of a Brontosaurus, a Tyrannosaurus rex, and a caveman. Obviously these are the most well-known pre-historic creatures today, but lived tens of millions of years apart.
* The page image for PrehistoricMonster, taken from ''[[Film/OneMIllionYearsBC One Million Years B.C.]]'', depicts a kangaroo-stance ''Allosaurus'' that stands only slightly taller than the humans in the picture. In real life, even the smallest ''Allosaurus'' would stand about a foot and a half taller than an average-sized human being. (Also, assuming the title of the film is accurate, dinosaurs would have gone extinct some 64,000,000 years ago.)
* In ''Film/PacificRim'', the Kaiju are stated to be so big that they require two brains "like a dinosaur". While some early paleontologists thought some dinosaurs (particularly the stegosaurs and sauropods) had two brains, virtually no paleontologist believes it today.
** This is a special case though, since it's just a line spoken by a scientist (but not a paleontologist) to a crime lord and thus it's possible that neither of them know that it's incorrect. The film never actually shows a two-brained dinosaur. Though it does imply that either the Kaiju killed the dinosaurs, or ''were'' the dinosaurs, and Kaiju do have two brains in the movie.
* In the comedy ''Film/BringingUpBaby'', one of the main subplots involves paleontologist Actor/CaryGrant retrieving a missing dinosaur bone with the help of ManicPixieDreamGirl Actor/KatherineHepburn. The bone in question is described as an "Intercostal clavicle". There is no such thing as an "intercostal clavical". Intercostal means "between the ribs" and the clavicle is a collar bone.
** The dinosaur in question is called a ''Brontosaurus''. Even at the time the film was made, the scientific community would have called it ''Apatosaurus''.

Top