Follow TV Tropes

Reviews Film / Terminator Genisys

Go To

jakobitis Doctor of Doctorates Since: Jan, 2015
Doctor of Doctorates
07/23/2015 04:50:03 •••

The 'Complilation Album' of Terminator Films - Possible spoilers...

Genisys is definitely not the worst of the Terminator films, let's get that right out of the way up front. Both 3 and 4/Salvation were far worse. But equally... it's far from the best. Whether you prefer the first or second, either is far superior to Genisys.

The reason for this is as alluded in the title... the approach taken is basically a 'greatest hits' of Terminator: finding iconic/popular bits from the other films and cobbling together a 'new' film from those pieces.

From the first film they take certain scenes (initially) shot-for-shot, and the general approach of an unstoppable killer sent in time. Many of the 'catchphrases' ('Come with me if you want to live!'and more) are recycled too.

From the second we get an Schwarzenator with a paternal/guardian role and a liquid T1000. From the fourth is taken John Connor the war leader and a Kyle who fought/survived in the war, as alluded to in the first of course. Only the third is passed over, because frankly, it's pretty terrible.

And all these pieces do work. It's not a bad film, at all. There's plenty of action, a smattering of humour (mostly provided by Arnie and an underutilised JK Simmons), stunts and time travel - Terminator in a nutshell. It's fun enough and enjoyable in it's way, though it's own internal logic and rules about time travel seem to be discarded pretty easily and multiple timelines/loops are just brushed aside with a simple handwave and mention of 'quantum' and promptly ignored thereafter.

But... it's not really a good film, either. Or certainly, no classic like the first two in their ways. Despite a really powerful and dangerous 'bad' Terminator, the protagonists never seem to be in any real danger, and tension suffers. Both the lead 'human' actors are far from convincing; Jai Courtney appears more robotic than Arnie ever could, and Emilia Clarke doesn't really sell the action girl side of Sarah Connor. The 'romance' is frankly embarrassingly bad and wisely mostly ignored.

The one decent twist that would elevate the material (John IS a Terminator) has sadly been spoiled by every trailer, even more unfortunately Clarke's is probably the best performance in the film but the impact is lost.

Should you watch this film? Yes, it's fun. But will it ever reach the status of one and two? No. Not ever.

SpectralTime Since: Apr, 2009
07/05/2015 00:00:00

I liked all the actors and thought they did a good job with the material, but if everyone else disagrees I won't tell them they're wrong.

And I defer to the Penny Arcade quote that the only difference between "recycling" and "homaging" is whether or not you liked it.

jakobitis Since: Jan, 2015
07/05/2015 00:00:00

Well that's what opinions are all about!

I should make clear, I don't disagree with recycling/homages in theory. My particular beef with this film is that it seems solely comprised of 'homages' cobbled together rather than attempting anything new and fresh at all.

This is not a flaw exclusive to this film of course but given how revolutionary the first two were in their different ways it is particularly disappointing, for me as a Terminator fan.

"These 'no-nonsense' solutions of yours just don't hold water in a complex world of jet-powered apes and time travel."
PandaXclone2 Since: Apr, 2011
07/21/2015 00:00:00

I agree with you for the most part, but while Terminator 1 and 2 are by far the best ones and it's doubtful they will be beaten by new films in the franchise, that doesn't necessarily mean Genisys can't be good in it's own right.

Terminator's been doing callbacks since T3 which, while I can agree if you find it not to be a good film, has set the trend of callbacks in the franchise as par for the course.

Tomwithnonumbers Since: Dec, 2010
07/21/2015 00:00:00

I don't know, as far as comedy there was one running gag that was funny with Arnie and JK Simmons was funny. And I thought the action was pretty terrible all over, the only things I can remember even just one week after are the things that I was laughing at in the cinema.

Like when Arnie some how jumps through the blades of the helicopter without damaging them and blows up the helicopter which someone manages to fall onto the helipad John Connor wanted to go to anyway ahead of the non-blown up helicopter which was directly above and driving to the same place.

Or when they make a bus jump like two stories into the air and I think it does two spins before landing?

Or scene after scene after scene of people standing still and shooting terminators even though everyone doing the shooting knows it will do absolutely nothing.

Some of the special effects looked like they were out of a videogame, and not a modern one either, like a cutscene in the terrible Terminator Salvation cash-in last generation.

Even the incredibly forgettable Terminator Salvation had a few action scenes that were interesting instead of random stuff happening until it randomly stops.

If we did accept that the action wasn't 'bad', can you actually name a film you've seen in the last couple of years where the action was actually worse? You could go into any film any time of the year and see equally as good action.

SpectralTime Since: Apr, 2009
07/22/2015 00:00:00

The Hunger Games and TMNT movies all have *terrible* action, because, in their attempts to invoke a "documentary" feel, they only succeed in making sure no one can see what the heck is going on. Surely you can agree that in Genisys, they at least put the camera on a bloody tripod, and use shots to establish where the characters are in relation to one another and the setpieces.

But, really, people always harp on shooting up the Terminators. It may not kill them, but it slows them down, and that's generally all they're after.

...Eh, whatever. Taste is subjective. Maybe you're into that kinda thing.

Tomwithnonumbers Since: Dec, 2010
07/22/2015 00:00:00

The Hunger Games isn't an action film, it's a mistake people seem to keep making - the point is you're not meant to be enjoying the fighting.

And I could point to twenty as-basic failures that Terminator Genysis makes, but instead how about this, talk about two action scenes in the film that you remember clearly and why you liked them?

Tomwithnonumbers Since: Dec, 2010
07/22/2015 00:00:00

You can point to any scene in Terminator Genysis and be unable to answer really basic questions like "What does that character want to do and how are they doing it?" It fails at even basic cause and effect.

Here's yet another ludicrous scene in the film: The two protagonists are in the room with the time machine, they realise they need to be naked to travel so what they do is:

1) Walk out of the time machine room, to the locker room(!) in their super secret base made for just Sarah Connor and the Terminator.

2) Take of their clothes in the locker room

3) Put on night clothes so that they're not naked whilst walking back to the time machine room.

4) Enter the time machine room, take their clothes off again, walk up to the time machine and enter it.

The whole film is like that, every action scene is like that. In the first two Terminator films at any moment you know what the characters want to do in an action sequence, and how difficult it is for them to achieve it. In Genysis you're just waiting for the director to decide the scene has ended and cut to the next action scene.

SpectralTime Since: Apr, 2009
07/22/2015 00:00:00

...Wow. I'm not sure I should respond to that, so much as encourage you to put up your *own* review, then respond to *that*.

I mean, I don't agree. What you describe is, for instance, rather similar to something that I once had to do in a hospital, and they didn't necessarily *have* night clothes to go through with.

But, and this is probably the more important point, why? Why does it matter? If your suspension of disbelief is so ridiculously thin that you're thinking harder about where the characters are getting dressed and why than about the characters and how they're interacting, you hated the film with such a bitter passion that nothing I say will ever convince you otherwise.

...But, to answer your question, I liked Kyle Reese's rematch with the T-800, both for the funny mythology gags where he kept trying to hit it with the metal bar, and because it quickly and efficiently established both participants' goals and had them both working towards them for the duration of the scene, and the scene with "Pops" and the T-5000, both because it demonstrates some creative uses of the machine's shapeshifter powers, and because it gives the original Terminator a simultaneously tragic and triumphant send off. I mean, I appreciate that this is useless, but you asked a question in good faith, and I'm now answering it.

PandaXclone2 Since: Apr, 2011
07/23/2015 00:00:00

I liked the fights between Kyle and the just revived T-800 + Sarah & Pops vs T-1000. What interested me most was seeing something new that mimetic poly-alloy can do, namely being able to re-activate a T-800. Not only that, but we get to see a new method to destroying a T-1000, that being acid. Bad movie or no, we've never seen either of these before in a new Terminator film. That and Connor being a new Terminator completely.


Leave a Comment:

Top