Really? I\'ve heard differently. Heck, look at Capcom. They put their trust in him and he decided to stab them in the back.
Doesn\'t that prove his/her point? he\'s a reviewer, he\'s suppose to work for the consumers not the gaming companies.
Context would be appreciated. The rhetoric sounds a bit silly; a You Tuber betraying a multimillion-dollar company? Oh for shame!
Betrayed Capcom how? Dude has bashed Capcom plenty of times and not without a good reason.
Wasn\'t he paid by Capcom to promote Street Fighter V, and he ended up demoting it instead?
The fact that you honestly believe it\'s the job of the journalist to \"promote\" the games they review instead of actually reviewing them says a great deal more about you than him.
He wasn't "paid" he was given a key of the game to promote it, when he mentioned what he perceived as flaws, they took down his video (unfairly I may add) and then quietly brought it back later after controversy. Also like Spectral Time said, are you seriously aguing for crony methods?
Leave a Comment:
Actually helpful
This review is subjected to change, in 3 years maybe
He's angry joe, enough can be figured out from that title alone. Yet most of the time he isn't even that angry. Although that title really pops up once he gets to the bad or disappointing games. Or anything else really, like the Last Airbender movie. As a reviewer, he takes his time to really describe what's good and what's bad about a game. How a game can also improve. He is one of those online reviewers that you can actually put your trust in. Sure like all reviewers they might be bias on very rare and certain times, but mostly everything that they say can be believed. He is amusing when angry, and helpful when doing a good review on a good game.
Although the length of his videos might scare people, his videos are great quality. Nice intros, and variety of games to review. Keep up the good work Joe. Even with your other non-review videos