RoadHazard7696
Since: Jun, 2012
Dec 9th 2012 at 10:11:08 AM
•••
This article fails to mention the EMP. I don't know much about it or I'd add it myself.
OldManHoOh
It's super effective.
Since: Jul, 2010
It's super effective.
Jan 15th 2012 at 3:40:50 AM
•••
I don't get the Sarah Jane Smith reference. Someone explain?
Hide / Show Replies
Ja9Oz
Since: Dec, 1969
Sep 29th 2012 at 1:09:50 PM
•••
Hey, fantastic TV Tropers - unfortunately, seems like the links to Nuclear Warfare 101, 102 and 103 no longer work. Real shame, needed to read those essays. Any way to fix? Thanks xox
Um... if I may be so bold...this article reads like it was written to inform worst-case (1980s) fictional depictions of nuclear war, with commensurate sizes of arsenals, and then-current thinking on EMP, ozone layer and nuclear-winter effects. I did a great deal of research in late 2016 citing credible sources for my own purposes (abandoned book project) and I'd be happy to at least share those sources, which project a more nuanced or doubtful view on these matters. But the last thing I want to do is offend anyone, it's just not worth it.