Discussion History Characters / TwoKinds

That is an all-or-nothing false dichotomy. Xena\\\'s armor is much more sensible than a ChainmailBikini. (There is an entry for her on that page, but it says that armor \\\"is not a particularly heavy offender\\\".)

[[subscript:v]] No, I meant the false dilemma between \\\"completely sensible\\\" and \\\"not sensible at all\\\". I think Xena\\\'s armor is somewhere between those extremes. I really don\\\'t want to comment back and forth about this. (Might want to rethink the statement about human observation not being a kind of evidence, though.)

That is an all-or-nothing false dichotomy. Xena\\\'s armor is much more sensible than a ChainmailBikini. (There is an entry for her on that page, but it says that armor \\\"is not a particularly heavy offender\\\".)

[[subscript:v]] No, I meant the false dilemma between \\\"completely sensible\\\" and \\\"not sensible at all\\\". I think Xena\\\'s armor is somewhere between those extremes. I really don\\\'t want to comment back and forth about this. (Might want to rethink the statement about human observation not counting as evidence, though.)

That is an all-or-nothing false dichotomy. Xena\\\'s armor is much more sensible than a ChainmailBikini. (There is an entry for her on that page, but it says that armor \\\"is not a particularly heavy offender\\\".)

[[subscript:v]] No, I meant the false dilemma between \\\"completely sensible\\\" and \\\"not sensible at all\\\". I think Xena\\\'s armor is somewhere between those extremes. I really don\\\'t want to comment back-and-forth about this. (Might want to rethink the statement about human observation not counting as evidence, though.)

That is an all-or-nothing false dichotomy. Xena\\\'s armor is much more sensible than a ChainmailBikini. (There is an entry for her on that page, but it says that armor \\\"is not a particularly heavy offender\\\".)

[[subscript:v]] No, I meant the false dilemma is between \\\"completely sensible\\\" and \\\"not sensible at all\\\". I think Xena\\\'s armor is somewhere between those extremes. I really don\\\'t want to comment back-and-forth about this. (Might want to rethink the statement about human observation not counting as evidence, though.)

That is an all-or-nothing false dichotomy. Xena\\\'s armor is much more sensible than a ChainmailBikini. (There is an entry for her on that page, but it says that armor \\\"is not a particularly heavy offender\\\".)

[[subscript:v]] No, I meant the false dilemma is between \\\"completely sensible\\\" and \\\"not sensible at all\\\". I think Xena\\\'s armor is somewhere between those extremes. I really don\\\'t want to comment back-and-forth about this. (Might want to rethink the statement about human observation not counting as evidence, though. All or nothing again :)

That is an all-or-nothing false dichotomy. Xena\\\'s armor is much more sensible than a ChainmailBikini. (There is an entry for her on that page, but it says that armor \\\"is not a particularly heavy offender\\\".)

[[subscript:v]] No, I meant the false dilemma is between \\\"completely sensible\\\" and \\\"not sensible at all\\\". I think Xena\\\'s armor is somewhere between those extremes. I really don\\\'t want to comment back-and-forth about this. (Might want to rethink the statement about human observation not counting as evidence, though.)

That is an all-or-nothing false dichotomy. Xena\\\'s armor is much more sensible than a ChainmailBikini. (There is an entry for her on that page, but it says that armor \\\"is not a particularly heavy offender\\\".)

[[subscript:v]] No, I meant the false dilemma is between \\\"completely sensible\\\" and \\\"not sensible at all\\\". I think Xena\\\'s armor is somewhere between those extremes. I really don\\\'t want to comment back-and-forth about this, though.

That is an all-or-nothing false dichotomy. Xena\\\'s armor is much more sensible than a ChainmailBikini. (There is an entry for her on that page, but it says that armor \\\"is not a particularly heavy offender\\\".)

[[subscript:vv]] No, I meant the false dilemma is between \\\"completely sensible\\\" and \\\"not sensible at all\\\". I think Xena\\\'s armor is somewhere between those extremes. I really don\\\'t want to comment back-and-forth about this, though.

That is an all-or-nothing false dichotomy. Xena\\\'s armor is much more sensible than a ChainmailBikini. (There is an entry for her on that page, but it says that armor \\\"is not a particularly heavy offender\\\".)

Jeez what is up with the all-or-nothing false dichotomy? Xena\\\'s armor is much more sensible than a ChainmailBikini. (There is an entry for her on that page, but it says that armor \\\"is not a particularly heavy offender\\\".)

Jeez what is up with the \\\"all or nothing\\\" false dichotomy? Xena\\\'s armor is much more sensible than a ChainmailBikini. (There is an entry for her on that page, but it says that armor \\\"is not a particularly heavy offender\\\".)

Jeez what is up with the \\\"all or nothing\\\" false dichotomy? Xena\\\'s armor is much more sensible than a ChainmailBikini. (There is an entry for her on that page, but it says she \\\"is not a particularly heavy offender\\\".)

Jeez what is up with the \\\"complete, or zero\\\" false dichotomy? Xena\\\'s armor is much more sensible than a ChainmailBikini. (There is an entry for her on that page, but it says she \\\"is not a particularly heavy offender\\\".)