[002]
Eagal
Current Version
Changed line(s) 9 from:
n
What we know about the Court\'s activities at that time: They didn\'t like that the Forest just accepted the Ether as AWizardDidIt and were trying to \
to:
What we know about the Court\\\'s activities at that time: They didn\\\'t like that the Forest just accepted the Ether as AWizardDidIt and were trying to \\\"tame\\\" the creatures of the Forest, which however you phrase it does not speak well of them. Certainly it was bad enough for Coyote to separate the Court from the forest.
What we know about the Forest\\\'s activities at the time: Absolutely dick.
Conclusion: Based on the facts currently available, this is not a conflict of freethinkers vs luddites. If it\\\'s anything, it\\\'s one between ForScience and their victims.
What we know about the Forest\\\'s activities at the time: Absolutely dick.
Conclusion: Based on the facts currently available, this is not a conflict of freethinkers vs luddites. If it\\\'s anything, it\\\'s one between ForScience and their victims.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
The same people that sentenced Jeanne to death and damaged the ether are the RotD people that were in conflict with the Forest. Do you
to:
The same people that sentenced Jeanne to death and damaged the ether and the RotD are the same people that were in conflict with the Forest.
Changed line(s) 9 from:
n
What we know about the Court\'s activities at that time: They didn\'t like that the Forest just accepted the Ether as AWizardDidIt and were trying to \
to:
What we know about the Court\\\'s activities at that time: They didn\\\'t like that the Forest just accepted the Ether as AWizardDidIt and were trying to \\\"tame\\\" the creatures of the Forest, which however you phrase it does not speak well of them. Certainly it was bad enough for Coyote to separate the Court from the forest.
What we know about the Forest\\\'s activities at the time: Absolutely dick.
Conclusion: This is not a conflict of freethinkers vs luddites. If it\\\'s anything, it\\\'s one between ForScience and their victims.
What we know about the Forest\\\'s activities at the time: Absolutely dick.
Conclusion: This is not a conflict of freethinkers vs luddites. If it\\\'s anything, it\\\'s one between ForScience and their victims.
