[005]
12.239.13.140
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Septimus, no offense intended, but that answer is demanding us to provide evidence \'\'you\'ll accept\'\', which is not productive to an argument. \
to:
Septimus, no offense intended, but that answer is demanding us to provide evidence \\\'\\\'you\\\'ll accept\\\'\\\', which is not productive to an argument. \\\"I\\\'ve seen stuff that contradicts this\\\" doesn\\\'t help. At the very least, we could compare your sources. Let me demonstrate why:
-->\\\"I have conclusive evidence that Black persons are human and there is no substantial difference between them and Whites.\\\"
-->\\\"I\\\'ve seen many sources contradicting that, so it seems to be undecided.\\\"
Also, if the argument is that this \\\"isn\\\'t conclusive\\\" (meaning no scientific consensus), then that\\\'s all the more reason to \\\'\\\'\\\'remove\\\'\\\'\\\' the entry as it argues a conclusive point.
-->\\\"I have conclusive evidence that Black persons are human and there is no substantial difference between them and Whites.\\\"
-->\\\"I\\\'ve seen many sources contradicting that, so it seems to be undecided.\\\"
Also, if the argument is that this \\\"isn\\\'t conclusive\\\" (meaning no scientific consensus), then that\\\'s all the more reason to \\\'\\\'\\\'remove\\\'\\\'\\\' the entry as it argues a conclusive point.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Septimus, no offense intended, but that answer is demanding us to provide evidence \'\'you\'ll accept\'\', which is not productive to an argument. \
to:
Septimus, no offense intended, but that answer is demanding us to provide evidence \\\'\\\'you\\\'ll accept\\\'\\\', which is not productive to an argument. \\\"I\\\'ve seen stuff that contradicts this\\\" doesn\\\'t help. At the very least, we could compare your sources. Let me demonstrate why:
-->\\\"I have conclusive evidence that Black persons are human and there is no substantial difference between them and Whites.\\\"
-->\\\"I\\\'ve seen many sources contradicting that, so it seems to be undecided.\\\"
Also, if the argument is that this \\\"isn\\\'t conclusive\\\" (meaning no scientific consensus), then that\\\'s all the more reason to \\\'\\\'\\\'remove\\\'\\\'\\\' the entry as it argues a conclusive point.
-->\\\"I have conclusive evidence that Black persons are human and there is no substantial difference between them and Whites.\\\"
-->\\\"I\\\'ve seen many sources contradicting that, so it seems to be undecided.\\\"
Also, if the argument is that this \\\"isn\\\'t conclusive\\\" (meaning no scientific consensus), then that\\\'s all the more reason to \\\'\\\'\\\'remove\\\'\\\'\\\' the entry as it argues a conclusive point.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Septimus, no offense intended, but that answer is demanding us to provide evidence \'\'you\'ll accept\'\', which is not productive to an argument. \
to:
Septimus, no offense intended, but that answer is demanding us to provide evidence \\\'\\\'you\\\'ll accept\\\'\\\', which is not productive to an argument. \\\"I\\\'ve seen stuff that contradicts this\\\" doesn\\\'t help. At the very least, we could compare your sources. Let me demonstrate why:
-->\\\"I have conclusive evidence that Black persons are human and there is no substantial difference between them and Whites.\\\"
-->\\\"I\\\'ve seen many sources contradicting that, so it seems to be undecided.\\\"
Also, if the arugment is that this \\\"isn\\\'t conclusive\\\" (meaning no scientific consensus), then that\\\'s all the more reason to \\\'\\\'\\\'remove\\\'\\\'\\\' the entry as it argues a conclusive point.
-->\\\"I have conclusive evidence that Black persons are human and there is no substantial difference between them and Whites.\\\"
-->\\\"I\\\'ve seen many sources contradicting that, so it seems to be undecided.\\\"
Also, if the arugment is that this \\\"isn\\\'t conclusive\\\" (meaning no scientific consensus), then that\\\'s all the more reason to \\\'\\\'\\\'remove\\\'\\\'\\\' the entry as it argues a conclusive point.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Septimus, no offense intended, but that answer is demanding us to provide evidence \'\'you\'ll accept\'\', which is not productive to an argument. \
to:
Septimus, no offense intended, but that answer is demanding us to provide evidence \\\'\\\'you\\\'ll accept\\\'\\\', which is not productive to an argument. \\\"I\\\'ve seen stuff that contradicts this\\\" doesn\\\'t help. At the very least, we could compare your sources. Let me demonstrate why:
-->\\\"I have conclusive evidence that Black persons are human and there is no substantial difference between them and Whites.\\\"
-->\\\"I\\\'ve seen many sources contradicting that, so it seems to be undecided.\\\"
Also, if the arugment is that this \\\"isn\\\'t conclusive\\\", then that\\\'s all the more reason to \\\'\\\'\\\'remove\\\'\\\'\\\' the entry as it argues a conclusive point.
-->\\\"I have conclusive evidence that Black persons are human and there is no substantial difference between them and Whites.\\\"
-->\\\"I\\\'ve seen many sources contradicting that, so it seems to be undecided.\\\"
Also, if the arugment is that this \\\"isn\\\'t conclusive\\\", then that\\\'s all the more reason to \\\'\\\'\\\'remove\\\'\\\'\\\' the entry as it argues a conclusive point.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Septimus, you\'re asking us to provide evidence \'\'you\'ll accept\'\', which is not productive to an argument. \
to:
Septimus, no offense intended, but that answer is demanding us to provide evidence \\\'\\\'you\\\'ll accept\\\'\\\', which is not productive to an argument. \\\"I\\\'ve seen stuff that contradicts this\\\" doesn\\\'t help. At the very least, we could compare your sources.
Also, if the arugment is that this \\\"isn\\\'t conclusive\\\", then that\\\'s all the more reason to \\\'\\\'\\\'remove\\\'\\\'\\\' the entry as it argues a conclusive point.
Also, if the arugment is that this \\\"isn\\\'t conclusive\\\", then that\\\'s all the more reason to \\\'\\\'\\\'remove\\\'\\\'\\\' the entry as it argues a conclusive point.
