[003]
158.149.231.15
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
** The writers of \
to:
** The writers of \\\"Twistory\\\" also made some historically inaccurate wallbangers. Among other things, [[ArtisticLicenseHistory George Washington did not have an obsession for chopping wood (hell, the cherry tree story wasn\\\'t even true), Benjamin Franklin\\\'s kite experiment didn\\\'t have anything to do with lightning, Benedict Arnold didn\\\'t disguise himself as George Washington because Jefferson, Franklin, and Washington disappeared, and John Hancock also didn\\\'t have an obsession for signing documents/treaties).]]
Does this deserve to be on this page? Most of it is played for laughs. It\\\'s not like the episode tries to tell you that this is what history really was like. The writers basically exaggerated some facts and misconceptions for the sake of humour.
Does this deserve to be on this page? Most of it is played for laughs. It\\\'s not like the episode tries to tell you that this is what history really was like. The writers basically exaggerated some facts and misconceptions for the sake of humour.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
** The writers of \
to:
** The writers of \\\"Twistory\\\" also made some historically inaccurate wallbangers. Among other things, [[ArtisticLicenseHistory George Washington did not have an obsession for chopping wood (hell, the cherry tree story wasn\\\'t even true), Benjamin Franklin\\\'s kite experiment didn\\\'t have anything to do with lightning, Benedict Arnold didn\\\'t disguise himself as George Washington because Jefferson, Franklin, and Washington disappeared, and John Hancock also didn\\\'t have an obsession for signing documents/treaties).]]
Does this deserve to be here? Most of it is played for laughs. It\\\'s not like the episode tries to tell you that this is what history really was like. The writers basically exaggerated some facts and misconceptions for the sake of humour.
Does this deserve to be here? Most of it is played for laughs. It\\\'s not like the episode tries to tell you that this is what history really was like. The writers basically exaggerated some facts and misconceptions for the sake of humour.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
** The writers of \
to:
** The writers of \\\"Twistory\\\" also made some historically inaccurate wallbangers. Among other things, [[ArtisticLicenseHistory George Washington did not have an obsession for chopping wood (hell, the cherry tree story wasn\\\'t even true), Benjamin Franklin\\\'s kite experiment didn\\\'t have anything to do with lightning, Benedict Arnold didn\\\'t disguise himself as George Washington because Jefferson, Franklin, and Washington disappeared, and John Hancock also didn\\\'t have an obsession for signing documents/treaties).]]
Does this deserve a bullet point? Most of it is played for laughs. It\\\'s not like the episode tries to tell you that this is what history really was like. The writers basically exaggerated some facts and misconceptions for the sake of humour.
Does this deserve a bullet point? Most of it is played for laughs. It\\\'s not like the episode tries to tell you that this is what history really was like. The writers basically exaggerated some facts and misconceptions for the sake of humour.
