[008]
2.97.135.4
Current Version
Changed line(s) 7 from:
n
If an inversion is Redheads Want Heroes, doesn\'t that mean Pyrrha\'s interest in Jaune is demonstrably because she\'s a redhead rather than for any other reason?
to:
If an inversion is Redheads Want Heroes, doesn\\\'t that mean Pyrrha\\\'s interest in Jaune demonstrably has to be because she\\\'s a redhead rather than for any other reason?
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
I need to understand why this example can be troped and then I need to understand why the example is an inversion of this trope. In HeroesWantRedheads, despite other hair colour opportunities existing, it\'s redhead that\'s marked for becoming the hero\'s love interest. However, I don\'t know of any recognised trend that considers Redheads Want Heroes to be a trope. Also, one of the trope description\'s paragraphs implies that the trope inversion might actually be the hero being the redhead (which would not be Redheads Want Heroes).
to:
I need to understand why this example can be troped and then I need to understand why the example is an inversion of this trope. In HeroesWantRedheads, despite other hair colour opportunities existing, it\\\'s the redhead that\\\'s marked for becoming the hero\\\'s love interest. However, I don\\\'t know of any recognised trend that considers Redheads Want Heroes to be a trope. Also, one of the trope description\\\'s paragraphs implies that the trope inversion might actually be the hero being the redhead (which would not be Redheads Want Heroes).
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
I need to understand why this example can be troped and then I need to understand why the example is an inversion of this trope. The point of HeroesWantRedheads is that, given the choice of any other hair colour he could love, it\'s the redhead that is set up to be the protagonist\'s love interest. However, I don\'t know of any recognised trend that considers Redheads Want Heroes to be a trope. Also, one of the trope description\'s paragraphs implies that the trope inversion might actually be the hero being the redhead (which would not be Redheads Want Heroes).
to:
I need to understand why this example can be troped and then I need to understand why the example is an inversion of this trope. In HeroesWantRedheads, despite other hair colour opportunities existing, it\\\'s redhead that\\\'s marked for becoming the hero\\\'s love interest. However, I don\\\'t know of any recognised trend that considers Redheads Want Heroes to be a trope. Also, one of the trope description\\\'s paragraphs implies that the trope inversion might actually be the hero being the redhead (which would not be Redheads Want Heroes).
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
I need to understand why this example can be troped and then I need to understand why the example is an inversion of this trope. The point of HeroesWantRedheads is that, given the choice of any other hair colour he could love, the protagonist ends up with the redhead. However, I don\'t know of any recognised trend that considers Redheads Want Heroes to be a trope. Also, one of the trope description\'s paragraphs implies that the trope inversion might actually be the hero being the redhead (which would not be Redheads Want Heroes).
to:
I need to understand why this example can be troped and then I need to understand why the example is an inversion of this trope. The point of HeroesWantRedheads is that, given the choice of any other hair colour he could love, it\\\'s the redhead that is set up to be the protagonist\\\'s love interest. However, I don\\\'t know of any recognised trend that considers Redheads Want Heroes to be a trope. Also, one of the trope description\\\'s paragraphs implies that the trope inversion might actually be the hero being the redhead (which would not be Redheads Want Heroes).
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
I need to understand why this example can be troped and then I need to understand why the example is an inversion of this trope. The point of HeroesWantRedheads is that, given the choice of any other hair colour he could love, the protagonist ends up with the redhead. However, I don\'t know of any recognised trend where Redheads Want Heroes exists to be troped and one of the trope descriptions even offers a hint that an inversion could be that it\'s the hero that\'s the redhead.
to:
I need to understand why this example can be troped and then I need to understand why the example is an inversion of this trope. The point of HeroesWantRedheads is that, given the choice of any other hair colour he could love, the protagonist ends up with the redhead. However, I don\\\'t know of any recognised trend that considers Redheads Want Heroes to be a trope. Also, one of the trope description\\\'s paragraphs implies that the trope inversion might actually be the hero being the redhead (which would not be Redheads Want Heroes).
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
I need to understand why this example can be troped and then I need to understand why the example is an inversion of this trope. The point of HeroesWantRedheads is that, given the choice of any other hair colour he could love, the protagonist ends up choosing the redhead. However, I don\'t know of any recognised trend where Redheads Want Heroes exists to be troped.
to:
I need to understand why this example can be troped and then I need to understand why the example is an inversion of this trope. The point of HeroesWantRedheads is that, given the choice of any other hair colour he could love, the protagonist ends up with the redhead. However, I don\\\'t know of any recognised trend where Redheads Want Heroes exists to be troped and one of the trope descriptions even offers a hint that an inversion could be that it\\\'s the hero that\\\'s the redhead.
Changed line(s) 7 from:
n
Surely an inversion of HeroesWantRedheads should be because Pyrrha\'s interest in Jaune is demonstrably because she\'s a redhead rather than for any other reason?
to:
If an inversion is Redheads Want Heroes, doesn\\\'t that mean Pyrrha\\\'s interest in Jaune is demonstrably because she\\\'s a redhead rather than for any other reason?
