[002]
108.170.107.74
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
The fact that it\'s a jargon term used by industry insiders is not a good argument for using it as a trope name. In fact, that should be cause for suspicion. Insider jargon terms are often opaque to outsiders, sometimes deliberately so. According to Administrivia/NamingATrope, trope names should be clear and descriptive. This one fails on both counts.
to:
The fact that it\\\'s a jargon term used by industry insiders is not a good argument for using it as a trope name. On the contrary, that should be cause for suspicion. Insider jargon terms are often opaque to outsiders, sometimes deliberately so. According to Administrivia/NamingATrope, trope names should be clear and descriptive. This one fails on both counts.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
The fact that it\'s a jargon term used by industry insiders is not a good argument for using it as a trope title. If anything, that should be cause for suspicion. Insider jargon terms are often opaque to outsiders, often deliberately so. According to Administrivia/NamingATrope, trope names should be clear and descriptive. This one fails on both counts.
to:
The fact that it\\\'s a jargon term used by industry insiders is not a good argument for using it as a trope name. In fact, that should be cause for suspicion. Insider jargon terms are often opaque to outsiders, sometimes deliberately so. According to Administrivia/NamingATrope, trope names should be clear and descriptive. This one fails on both counts.
