[001]
2.97.141.10
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Sorry, I didn\'t want to give detail to overwhelm you, only because I think they\'re a \'both or neither\' example and wanted to clarify why. I originally only added Sesshoumaru in the first place because I had a similar discussion with someone else where I realised I was arguing for Sesshoumaru as well as Naraku, so added him as a consequence. If you can think of a way to separate them out though, I\'ll be fine with that. I just can\'t at current think of an argument that doesn\'t apply to both of them.
to:
Sorry, I forgot which Discussion page I\\\'d responded to.
I didn\\\'t want to give detail to overwhelm you, only because I think they\\\'re a \\\'both or neither\\\' example and wanted to clarify why. I originally only added Sesshoumaru in the first place because I had a similar discussion with someone else where I realised I was arguing for Sesshoumaru as well as Naraku, so added him as a consequence. If you can think of a way to separate them out though, I\\\'ll be fine with that. I just can\\\'t at current think of an argument that doesn\\\'t apply to both of them.
I didn\\\'t want to give detail to overwhelm you, only because I think they\\\'re a \\\'both or neither\\\' example and wanted to clarify why. I originally only added Sesshoumaru in the first place because I had a similar discussion with someone else where I realised I was arguing for Sesshoumaru as well as Naraku, so added him as a consequence. If you can think of a way to separate them out though, I\\\'ll be fine with that. I just can\\\'t at current think of an argument that doesn\\\'t apply to both of them.
