Discussion History Monster / Pokemon

Spyro is residing in an arguable paradise in the sky with other like heroes. This Skyland also happens to be a place where all their heroic deeds have been recorded. Valhalla is a form of afterlife where those who have died in honorible battle are given new life. Also the villian transforms them into statues and thrusts them into the real world, forcing the over-thinking player to ask, \\\"Then what in Thor\\\'s name is Skyland if it is not considered \\\'the real world\\\'. Any lazy player without suspension of disbelief could say, Skyland isn\\\'t real its a video game. But in terms of the story\\\'s context, could Skyland be a form of afterlife?

\\\'\\\'it was people like you who continuely try to argue that their opinions aren\\\'t legitatemte that has resulted in the character being placed on the \\\"Never Again\\\" list.\\\'\\\'

LOL, I\\\'m sorry, WHO continuously tried to argue WHOSE opinions weren\\\'t legitimate? Because I recall 32_Footsteps basically calling the Pokemon fandom ignorant children prone to overemotional mood swings for daring to think of Ghetsis as a CompleteMonster.

\\\'\\\'So what you\\\'re saying is that the wiki hates Flame Wars SO MUCH it goes out of its way to obliterate ANY AND ALL POSSIBLE SPARKS, EVEN ON YMMV AND WMG. That\\\'s not only Draconian, that\\\'s downright Encyclopedia Dramatica Retgonning-level cowardly.\\\'\\\'

Sad but true.

\\\'\\\'We don\\\'t like our tropes being misused. So we delete misuse. Calling him a Complete Monster is just wrong. I fail to see why you have such an issue with this.\\\'\\\'

If Ghetsis were potholed to CompleteMonster or flat out called a CompleteMonster, yes, delete that. It\\\'s inaccurate with the Wiki\\\'s view. But things like Sugar Wiki (which is opinionated by nature) thinking of him as one or something stating that fans \\\'\\\'see\\\'\\\' him as one...those don\\\'t seem so damaging. And yet they still get removed because the wiki is that afraid of people getting \\\"the wrong idea.\\\"

\\\'\\\'If someone misused any other trope (let\\\'s say potholing Darth Vader with Fantastic Racism) we\\\'d delete the pothole, because it\\\'s objectively wrong.\\\'\\\'

CompleteMonster used to be a subjective trope, though. But now just this wiki can define who is \\\"factually\\\" a CM and who\\\'s not. This whole thing is what they say about the road to Hell.

\\\'\\\'it was people like you who continuely try to argue that their opinions aren\\\'t legitatemte that has resulted in the character being placed on the \\\"Never Again\\\" list.\\\'\\\'

LOL, I\\\'m sorry, WHO continuously tried to argue WHOSE opinions weren\\\'t legitimate? Because I recall 32_Footsteps basically calling the Pokemon fandom ignorant children prone to overemotional mood swings for daring to think of Ghetsis as a CompleteMonster.

\\\'\\\'So what you\\\'re saying is that the wiki hates Flame Wars SO MUCH it goes out of its way to obliterate ANY AND ALL POSSIBLE SPARKS, EVEN ON YMMV AND WMG. That\\\'s not only Draconian, that\\\'s downright Encyclopedia Dramatica Retgonning-level cowardly.\\\'\\\'

Sad but true.

\\\'\\\'We don\\\'t like our tropes being misused. So we delete misuse. Calling him a Complete Monster is just wrong. I fail to see why you have such an issue with this.\\\'\\\'

If Ghetsis were potholed to CompleteMonster or flat out called a CompleteMonster, yes, delete that. It\\\'s inaccurate with the Wiki\\\'s (stupid) view. But things like Sugar Wiki (which is opinionated by nature) thinking of him as one or something stating that fans \\\'\\\'see\\\'\\\' him as one...those don\\\'t seem so damaging. And yet they still get removed because the wiki is that afraid of people getting \\\"the wrong idea.\\\"

\\\'\\\'If someone misused any other trope (let\\\'s say potholing Darth Vader with Fantastic Racism) we\\\'d delete the pothole, because it\\\'s objectively wrong.\\\'\\\'

CompleteMonster used to be a subjective trope, though. But now just this wiki can define who is \\\"factually\\\" a CM and who\\\'s not. This whole thing is what they say about the road to Hell.

\\\'\\\'it was people like you who continuely try to argue that their opinions aren\\\'t legitatemte that has resulted in the character being placed on the \\\"Never Again\\\" list.\\\'\\\'

LOL, I\\\'m sorry, WHO continuously tried to argue WHOSE opinions weren\\\'t legitimate? Because I recall 32_Footsteps basically calling the Pokemon fandom ignorant children prone to overemotional mood swings for daring to think of Ghetsis as a CompleteMonster.

\\\'\\\'So what you\\\'re saying is that the wiki hates Flame Wars SO MUCH it goes out of its way to obliterate ANY AND ALL POSSIBLE SPARKS, EVEN ON YMMV AND WMG. That\\\'s not only Draconian, that\\\'s downright Encyclopedia Dramatica Retgonning-level cowardly.\\\'\\\'

Sad but true.

\\\'\\\'We don\\\'t like our tropes being misused. So we delete misuse. Calling him a Complete Monster is just wrong. I fail to see why you have such an issue with this.\\\'\\\'

If Ghetsis were potholed to CompleteMonster or flat out called a CompleteMonster, yes, delete that. It\\\'s inaccurate with the Wiki\\\'s (stupid) view. But thinks like Sugar Wiki (which is opinionated by nature) thinking of him as one or something stating that fans \\\'\\\'see\\\'\\\' him as one...those don\\\'t seem so damaging. And yet they still get removed because the wiki is that afraid of people getting \\\"the wrong idea.\\\"

\\\'\\\'If someone misused any other trope (let\\\'s say potholing Darth Vader with Fantastic Racism) we\\\'d delete the pothole, because it\\\'s objectively wrong.\\\'\\\'

CompleteMonster used to be a subjective trope, though. But now just this wiki can define who is \\\"factually\\\" a CM and who\\\'s not. This whole thing is what they say about the road to Hell.