[022]
87.249.145.69
Current Version
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
As for your \'Independence Day\' note - the entry should be perhaps reworded, e.g. \
to:
As for your \\\'Independence Day\\\' note - the entry should be perhaps reworded, e.g. \\\"only with missiles fired from the fighter jets.\\\" - but otherwise retained as it still displays the \\\"no combined arms\\\" facet of the Hollywood tactics, as the military (IIRC) does \\\'\\\'initially\\\'\\\' attempt to use fighter jets and their relatively light ordnance as the \\\'\\\'\\\'only\\\'\\\'\\\' defensive measure against [[SciFiWritersHave/NoSenseOfMass city-sized spaceships]] - apparently in Hollywoodland noone bothered to cogitate whether the 20 pound Sidewinder warhead would really damage a spaceship of that size, whether there are not some other, more effective Air-Air missiles, and apparently there are no ground- or sea-based AA/ABM missile systems etc.
Using a sea-skimming anti-ship missile (if the Harpoon was really used) against an aerial target does not seem to be the brightest of tactical ideas, either.
Using a sea-skimming anti-ship missile (if the Harpoon was really used) against an aerial target does not seem to be the brightest of tactical ideas, either.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
As for your \'Independence Day\' note - the entry should be perhaps reworded, e.g. \
to:
As for your \\\'Independence Day\\\' note - the entry should be perhaps reworded, e.g. \\\"only with missiles fired from the fighter jets.\\\" - but otherwise retained as it still displays the \\\"no combined arms\\\" facet of the Hollywood tactics, as the military (IIRC) does \\\'\\\'\\\'initially\\\'\\\'\\\' attempt to use fighter jets and their relatively light ordnance as the \\\'\\\'only\\\'\\\' defensive measure against [[SciFiWritersHave/NoSenseOfMass city-sized spaceships]] - apparently in Hollywoodland noone bothered to cogitate whether the 20 pound Sidewinder warhead would really damage a spaceship of that size, whether there are not some other, more effective Air-Air missiles, and apparently there are no ground- or sea-based AA/ABM missile systems etc.
Using a sea-skimming anti-ship missile (if the Harpoon was really used) against an aerial target does not seem to be the brightest of tactical ideas, either.
Using a sea-skimming anti-ship missile (if the Harpoon was really used) against an aerial target does not seem to be the brightest of tactical ideas, either.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
As for your \'Independence Day\' note - the entry should be perhaps reworded, e.g. \
to:
As for your \\\'Independence Day\\\' note - the entry should be perhaps reworded, e.g. \\\"only with missiles fired from the fighter jets.\\\" - but otherwise retained as it still displays the \\\"no combined arms\\\" facet of the Hollywood tactics, as the military (IIRC) does <u>initially</u> attempt to use fighter jets and their relatively light ordnance as the \\\'\\\'only\\\'\\\' defensive measure against [[SciFiWritersHave/NoSenseOfMass city-sized spaceships]] - apparently in Hollywoodland noone bothered to cogitate whether the 20 pound Sidewinder warhead would really damage a spaceship of that size, whether there are not some other, more effective Air-Air missiles, and apparently there are no ground- or sea-based AA/ABM missile systems etc.
Using a sea-skimming anti-ship missile (if the Harpoon was really used) against an aerial target does not seem to be the brightest of tactical ideas, either.
Using a sea-skimming anti-ship missile (if the Harpoon was really used) against an aerial target does not seem to be the brightest of tactical ideas, either.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
As for your \'Independence Day\' note - the entry should be perhaps reworded, e.g. \
to:
As for your \\\'Independence Day\\\' note - the entry should be perhaps reworded, e.g. \\\"only with missiles fired from the fighter jets.\\\" - but otherwise retained as it still displays the \\\"no combined arms\\\" facet of the Hollywood tactics, as the military (IIRC) does initially attempt to use fighter jets and their relatively light ordnance as the \\\'\\\'only\\\'\\\' defensive measure against [[SciFiWritersHave/NoSenseOfMass city-sized spaceships]] - apparently in Hollywoodland noone bothered to cogitate whether the 20 pound Sidewinder warhead would really damage a spaceship of that size, whether there are not some other, more effective Air-Air missiles, and apparently there are no ground- or sea-based AA/ABM missile systems etc.
Using a sea-skimming anti-ship missile (if the Harpoon was really used) against an aerial target does not seem to be the brightest of tactical ideas, either.
Using a sea-skimming anti-ship missile (if the Harpoon was really used) against an aerial target does not seem to be the brightest of tactical ideas, either.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
As for your \'Independence Day\' note - the entry should be perhaps reworded, e.g. \
to:
As for your \\\'Independence Day\\\' note - the entry should be perhaps reworded, e.g. \\\"only with missiles fired from the fighter jets.\\\" - but otherwise retained as it still displays the \\\"no combined arms\\\" facet of the Hollywood tactics, as the military (IIRC) does initially attempt to use fighter jets and their relatively light ordnance as the \\\'\\\'only\\\'\\\' defensive measure against [[SciFiWritersHave/NoSenseOfMass city-sized spaceships]] - apparently in Hollywoodland noone bothered to cogitate whether the 20 pound Sidewinder warhead would really damage a spaceship of that size and there are no ground- or sea-based AA/ABM missile systems etc.
Using a sea-skimming anti-ship missile (if the Harpoon was really used) against an aerial target does not seem to be the brightest of tactical ideas, either.
Using a sea-skimming anti-ship missile (if the Harpoon was really used) against an aerial target does not seem to be the brightest of tactical ideas, either.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
As for your \'Independence Day\' note - the entry should be perhaps reworded, e.g. \
to:
As for your \\\'Independence Day\\\' note - the entry should be perhaps reworded, e.g. \\\"only with missiles fired from the fighter jets.\\\" - but otherwise retained as it still displays the \\\"no combined arms\\\" facet of the Hollywood tactics, as the military (IIRC) does initially attempt to use fighter jets and their relatively light ordnance as the \\\'\\\'only\\\'\\\' defensive measure against [[SciFiWritersHave/NoSenseOfMass city-sized spaceships]] - apparently in Hollywoodland bothered to cogitate whether the 20 pound Sidewinder warhead would really damage a spaceship of that size and there are no ground- or sea-based AA/ABM missile systems etc.
Using a sea-skimming anti-ship missile (if the Harpoon was really used) against an aerial target does not seem to be the brightest of tactical ideas, either.
Using a sea-skimming anti-ship missile (if the Harpoon was really used) against an aerial target does not seem to be the brightest of tactical ideas, either.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
As for your \'Independence Day\' note - the entry should be perhaps reworded, e.g. \
to:
As for your \\\'Independence Day\\\' note - the entry should be perhaps reworded, e.g. \\\"only with missiles fired from the fighter jets.\\\" - but otherwise retained as it still displays the \\\"no combined arms\\\" facet of the Hollywood tactics, as the military (IIRC) does initially attempt to use fighter jets and their relatively light ordnance as the \\\'\\\'only\\\'\\\' defensive measure against [[SciFiWritersHave/NoSenseOfMass city-sized spaceships]] - apparently in Hollywoodland bothered to cogitate whether the 20 pound Sidewinder warhead would really damage a spaceship and there are no ground- or sea-based AA/ABM missile systems etc.
Using a sea-skimming anti-ship missile (if the Harpoon was really used) against an aerial target does not seem to be the brightest of tactical ideas, either.
Using a sea-skimming anti-ship missile (if the Harpoon was really used) against an aerial target does not seem to be the brightest of tactical ideas, either.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
\'\'How does the military start out attacking them? They only use fighter jets armed only with pissy little Sidewinders.\'\'
to:
[\\\'\\\'How does the military start out attacking them? They only use fighter jets armed only with pissy little Sidewinders.\\\'\\\']
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
As for your \'Independence Day\' note - the entry should be perhaps reworded, e.g. \
to:
As for your \\\'Independence Day\\\' note - the entry should be perhaps reworded, e.g. \\\"only with missiles fired from the fighter jets.\\\" - but otherwise retained as it still displays the \\\"no combined arms\\\" facet of the Hollywood tactics, as the military (IIRC) does initially attempt to use fighter jets and their relatively light ordnance as the \\\'\\\'only\\\'\\\' defensive measure against [[SciFiWritersHave/NoSenseOfMass city-sized spaceships]] - apparently in Hollywoodland there are no ground- or sea-based AA/ABM missile systems etc.
Using a sea-skimming anti-ship missile (if the Harpoon was really used) against an aerial target does not seem to be the brightest of tactical ideas, either.
Using a sea-skimming anti-ship missile (if the Harpoon was really used) against an aerial target does not seem to be the brightest of tactical ideas, either.
