[001]
70.211.8.193
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Its not really about cutting that one example, but the policy on every ME page in relation to the geth. People didn\'t think the example fit, since it relied on an assumption rather than a statement. So I got a statement- two in fact- supporting it. Yet, Shaoken insists that it still can\'t be added due to supposed UnreliableNarrator.
to:
Its not really about cutting that one example, but the policy on every ME page in relation to the geth. People didn\\\'t think the example fit, since it relied on an assumption rather than a statement. So I got a statement- two in fact- supporting it. Yet, Shaoken insists that it still can\\\'t be added due to supposed UnreliableNarrator. While continuing to advocate presenting things from a narrator that is just as potentially unreliable as facts.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
It was suggested that we have examples if they fit, but simply preface examples with the source of information (as right now there is a clear bias in who is considered unreliable and who isn\'t), as that is a purely fact based and objective approach. But Shaoken refused that (no one else has spoken out against this, and me and Zeal supported it, so \
to:
It was suggested that we have examples if they fit, but simply preface examples with the source of information (as right now there is a clear bias in who is considered unreliable and who isn\\\'t), as that is a purely fact based and objective approach. But Shaoken refused that (no one else has spoken out against this, and me and Zeal supported it, so \\\"the majority said no\\\" doesn\\\'t quite apply) and proceeded to outright lie / make things up to support himself.
