Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion History Main / NightmareFuel

Go To

[003] 70.211.8.193 Current Version

3rd Dec '13 at 12:41:21 PM

Changed line(s) 3 from:

n

All that proves is that Raan is weak and gullible, nothing else. So you\'ve just admitted to trusting the geth over everyone else. Okay? What does their willingness to cease conflict in the present day have to do with their trustworthiness? How does this at all mean that everything they say should be taken as fact whike everything else anyone says shoukd be disregarded?

to:

All that proves is that Raan is weak and gullible, nothing else. So you\\\'ve just admitted to trusting the geth over everyone else. Okay? What does their willingness to cease conflict in the present day have to do with their trustworthiness? How does this at all mean that everything they say should be taken as fact while everything else anyone says should be disregarded?

Changed line(s) 5 from:

n

\

to:

\\\"Geth do not experience fear\\\". Also, Legion sugarcoats what the geth do ALL the time. Not mentioning why they murder all people who come near their territory, for example. Stating that they acted purely in self-defense. And if you want to get into meta reasons, you\\\'d have to wonder why we\\\'d be told the same thing by several characters (one of which is considered wise and reasonable) and have it not be true, why unlike other geth myths (\\\"they all want to exterminate us) this one is NEVER contradicted, why its supported by several other implications, why the writers expected us to make a dumb and improbable leap from all this, etc.

[002] 70.211.8.193

3rd Dec '13 at 12:41:19 PM

Changed line(s) 3 from:

n

All that proves is that Raan is weak and gullible, nothing else. So you\'ve just admitted to trusting the geth over everyone else. Okay? What does their willingness to cease conflict in the present day have to do with their trustworthiness? How does this at all mean that everything they say should be taken as fact whike everything else anyone says shoukd be disregarded?

to:

All that proves is that Raan is weak and gullible, nothing else. So you\\\'ve just admitted to trusting the geth over everyone else. Okay? What does their willingness to cease conflict in the present day have to do with their trustworthiness? How does this at all mean that everything they say should be taken as fact while everything else anyone says should be disregarded?

Changed line(s) 5 from:

n

\

to:

\\\"Geth do not experience fear\\\". Also, Legion sugarcoats what the geth do ALL the time. Not mentioning why they murder all people who come near their territory, for example. Stating that they acted purely in self-defense. And if you want to get into meta reasons, you\\\'d have to wonder why we\\\'d be told the same thing by several characters (one of which is considered wise and reasonable) and have it not be true, why unlike other geth myths (\\\"they all want to exterminate us) this one is NEVER contradicted, why its supported by several other implications, why the writers expected us to make a dumb and improbable leap from all this, etc.

[001] 70.211.8.193

3rd Dec '13 at 12:35:38 PM

Changed line(s) 1 from:

n

And absolutely zero evidence that some didn\'t, and absolutely zero evidence that the quarian account is the sole basis for the Council account. That is, again, something entirely made up by you. Zero evidence that the geth account is any more reliable than the Council account- not that it matters, as the Council account doesn\'t contradict the geth one a bit and is entirely supported by the few concrete facts we know (99% of quarian population wiped out, Legion saying that the quarians have a right to be angry, Rannoch heavily damaged and still being cleaned of toxins 300 years later, the quarians not employing any weapons that would damage their own planets, etc.).

to:

And absolutely zero evidence that some didn\\\'t, and absolutely zero evidence that the quarian account is the sole basis for the Council account. That is, again, something entirely made up by you. It is entirely possible, even plausible, that the Council account came from first hand survivors, many of which may even be alive today. Zero evidence that the geth account is any more reliable than the Council account- not that it matters, as the Council account doesn\\\'t contradict the geth one a bit and is entirely supported by the few concrete facts we know (99% of quarian population wiped out, Legion saying that the quarians have a right to be angry, Rannoch heavily damaged and still being cleaned of toxins 300 years later, the quarians not employing any weapons that would damage their own planets, etc.).

Changed line(s) 5 from:

n

\

to:

\\\"Geth do not experience fear\\\". Also, Legion sugarcoats what the geth do ALL the time. Not mentioning why they murder all people who come near their territory, for example. Stating that they acted purely in self-defense. And if you want to get into meta reasons, you\\\'d have to wonder why we\\\'d be told the same thing by several characters (one of which is considered wise and reasonable) and have it not be trus, why unlike other geth myths (\\\"they all want to exterminate us) this one is NEVER contradicted, why its supported by several other implications, why the writers expected us to make a dumb and improbable leap from all this, etc.

Top