[002]
158.130.203.245
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
It might not be a bad idea to change \'explicitly\' to \'possibly,\' then. Explicitly would mean that the powers are outright stated somewhere in the source material (especially the \'second only to the presence part), unless the interview where that was stated is floating around somewhere.
to:
It might not be a bad idea to change \\\'explicitly\\\' to \\\'possibly,\\\' then. Explicitly would mean that the powers are outright stated somewhere in the source material (especially the \\\'second only to the presence\\\' part), unless the interview where that was stated is floating around somewhere.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
It might not be a bad idea to change \'explicitly\' to \'possibly,\' then. Explicitly would mean that the powers are outright stated somewhere in the source material, unless the interview where that was stated is floating around somewhere.
to:
It might not be a bad idea to change \\\'explicitly\\\' to \\\'possibly,\\\' then. Explicitly would mean that the powers are outright stated somewhere in the source material (especially the \\\'second only to the presence part), unless the interview where that was stated is floating around somewhere.
