Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion History WebVideo / JesuOtaku

Go To

Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
This whole paragraph is barely legible. The bits of it I understand don\'t seem to have anything to do with the trope -- it\'s nothing to do with characters not swearing, it\'s to do with how their swearing is portrayed to the reader. It also seems to be offering writing advice, rather than focusing on critiquing existing works, which is the usual tone of trope descriptions.
to:
This whole paragraph is very hard to understand. The bits of it I understand don\\\'t seem to have anything to do with the trope -- it\\\'s nothing to do with characters not swearing, it\\\'s to do with how their swearing is portrayed to the reader. It also seems to be offering writing advice, rather than focusing on critiquing existing works, which is the usual tone of trope descriptions.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
This whole paragraph is barely legible. The bits of it I understand don\'t seem to have anything to do with the trope -- it\'s nothing to do with characters not swearing, it\'s to do with how their swearing is portrayed to the reader. I\'ll try and salvage whatever I can, but I might have to take the whole leg.
to:
This whole paragraph is barely legible. The bits of it I understand don\\\'t seem to have anything to do with the trope -- it\\\'s nothing to do with characters not swearing, it\\\'s to do with how their swearing is portrayed to the reader. It also seems to be offering writing advice, rather than focusing on critiquing existing works, which is the usual tone of trope descriptions.

I\\\'ll try and salvage whatever I can, but I might have to take the whole leg.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Note just because this method exists, it doesn\'t mean you are being forced, or by any means should, divulge a work in profanity with filters. Sometimes, having characters not swear can come off as more realistic in certain situations, and having a character who has a trait of hardly ever cussing can be an example of when this trope doesn\'t need to be invoked, especially considering there are people who have those traits in real life. Of course, there is nothing wrong with this. \'\'\'This is not a trope to bash works or people that don\'t have or use profanity.\'\'\'
to:
\\\'\\\'Note just because this method exists, it doesn\\\'t mean you are being forced, or by any means should, divulge a work in profanity with filters. Sometimes, having characters not swear can come off as more realistic in certain situations, and having a character who has a trait of hardly ever cussing can be an example of when this trope doesn\\\'t need to be invoked, especially considering there are people who have those traits in real life. Of course, there is nothing wrong with this. \\\'\\\'\\\'This is not a trope to bash works or people that don\\\'t have or use profanity.\\\'\\\'\\\' \\\'\\\'
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
This whole paragraph is barely legible. The bits of it I understand don\'t seem to have anything to do with the trope -- it\'s nothing to do with characters not swearing, it\'s to do with how their swearing is portrayed to the reader.
to:
This whole paragraph is barely legible. The bits of it I understand don\\\'t seem to have anything to do with the trope -- it\\\'s nothing to do with characters not swearing, it\\\'s to do with how their swearing is portrayed to the reader. I\\\'ll try and salvage whatever I can, but I might have to take the whole leg.
Top