[006]
216.99.32.45
Current Version
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
Likewise, to Zuko, law is so much more important than life it completely overrides it for him; he doesn\'t kill for the hell of it(though Azula comes close), but unhesitatingly takes life if the law demands it(loads and loads of lethal traps, even on civilian conscripts). He specifically compares Aang to Ozai, saying they\'re key targets in the war, and neutrality wouldn\'t mean much if either side had a shot at the opposing target(\'\'\'though I really want to know how he\'ll feel about his father\'s Gordian solution to the War\'\'\'). He feels remorse, but its like Sam Gerard in Film/TheFugitive(\
to:
Likewise, to Zuko, law is so much more important than life it completely overrides it for him; he doesn\\\'t kill for the hell of it(though Azula comes close), but unhesitatingly takes life if the law demands it(loads and loads of lethal traps, even on civilian conscripts). He specifically compares Aang to Ozai, saying they\\\'re key targets in the war, and neutrality wouldn\\\'t mean much if either side had a shot at the opposing target(\\\'\\\'\\\'though I really want to know how he\\\'ll feel about his father\\\'s Gordian solution to the War\\\'\\\'\\\'). He feels remorse, but its like Sam Gerard in Film/TheFugitive(\\\"I didn\\\'t kill my wife!\\\" \\\"I don\\\'t care!\\\") - he does not let that get in the way of his duty in any way shape or form. To someone he\\\'s chased, it makes him look like a completely amoral monster.
The part that proves Zuko to be completely amoral to me - or at least that his morality has insufficient control over his actions? His disdain for Aang over breaking parole. He came to the South Pole with weapons and a great big ship, and laid down his Law; \\\"Give me the Avatar or people will suffer.\\\" Aang agrees to go with him to keep people from suffering, but Zuko seems to think he\\\'s done a great thing in threatening people to get his way, and is insulted almost to the point of murderous rage that Aang does not see that Law as gospel.
\\\"The removal of a threat is not a payment, the negation of a negative is not a reward, the withdrawal of your armed hoodlums is not an incentive, the offer not to murder me is not a value.\\\"
He is a thug with a uniform, and people have the right to see him as such. His might upholds his Law, so by his Law he has that right, and by my standards, I have the right to hate and wish the utter destruction of his Law. \\\"I don\\\'t think it\\\'s practical to support a protection racket.\\\" So I say, \\\"Down with the Fire Nation(s) and their rule by terror.\\\"
The part that proves Zuko to be completely amoral to me - or at least that his morality has insufficient control over his actions? His disdain for Aang over breaking parole. He came to the South Pole with weapons and a great big ship, and laid down his Law; \\\"Give me the Avatar or people will suffer.\\\" Aang agrees to go with him to keep people from suffering, but Zuko seems to think he\\\'s done a great thing in threatening people to get his way, and is insulted almost to the point of murderous rage that Aang does not see that Law as gospel.
\\\"The removal of a threat is not a payment, the negation of a negative is not a reward, the withdrawal of your armed hoodlums is not an incentive, the offer not to murder me is not a value.\\\"
He is a thug with a uniform, and people have the right to see him as such. His might upholds his Law, so by his Law he has that right, and by my standards, I have the right to hate and wish the utter destruction of his Law. \\\"I don\\\'t think it\\\'s practical to support a protection racket.\\\" So I say, \\\"Down with the Fire Nation(s) and their rule by terror.\\\"
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
Likewise, to Zuko, law is so much more important than life it completely overrides it for him; he doesn\'t kill for the hell of it(though Azula comes close), but unhesitatingly takes life if the law demands it(loads and loads of lethal traps, even on civilian conscripts). He specifically compares Aang to Ozai, saying they\'re key targets in the war, and neutrality wouldn\'t mean much if either side had a shot at the opposing target(\'\'\'though I really want to know how he\'ll feel about his father\'s Gordian solution to the War\'\'\'). He feels remorse, but its like Sam Gerard in Film/TheFugitive(\
to:
Likewise, to Zuko, law is so much more important than life it completely overrides it for him; he doesn\\\'t kill for the hell of it(though Azula comes close), but unhesitatingly takes life if the law demands it(loads and loads of lethal traps, even on civilian conscripts). He specifically compares Aang to Ozai, saying they\\\'re key targets in the war, and neutrality wouldn\\\'t mean much if either side had a shot at the opposing target(\\\'\\\'\\\'though I really want to know how he\\\'ll feel about his father\\\'s Gordian solution to the War\\\'\\\'\\\'). He feels remorse, but its like Sam Gerard in Film/TheFugitive(\\\"I didn\\\'t kill my wife!\\\" \\\"I don\\\'t care!\\\") - he does not let that get in the way of his duty in any way shape or form. To someone he\\\'s chased, it makes him look like a completely amoral monster.
The part that proves Zuko to be completely amoral to me? His disdain for Aang over breaking parole. He came to the South Pole with weapons and a great big ship, and laid down his Law; \\\"Give me the Avatar or people will suffer.\\\" Aang agrees to go with him to keep people from suffering, but Zuko seems to think he\\\'s done a great thing in threatening people to get his way, and is insulted almost to the point of murderous rage that Aang does not see that Law as gospel.
\\\"The removal of a threat is not a payment, the negation of a negative is not a reward, the withdrawal of your armed hoodlums is not an incentive, the offer not to murder me is not a value.\\\"
He is a thug with a uniform, and people have the right to see him as such. His might upholds his Law, so by his Law he has that right, and by my standards, I have the right to hate and wish the utter destruction of his Law. \\\"I don\\\'t think it\\\'s practical to support a protection racket.\\\" So I say, \\\"Down with the Fire Nation(s) and their rule by terror.\\\"
The part that proves Zuko to be completely amoral to me? His disdain for Aang over breaking parole. He came to the South Pole with weapons and a great big ship, and laid down his Law; \\\"Give me the Avatar or people will suffer.\\\" Aang agrees to go with him to keep people from suffering, but Zuko seems to think he\\\'s done a great thing in threatening people to get his way, and is insulted almost to the point of murderous rage that Aang does not see that Law as gospel.
\\\"The removal of a threat is not a payment, the negation of a negative is not a reward, the withdrawal of your armed hoodlums is not an incentive, the offer not to murder me is not a value.\\\"
He is a thug with a uniform, and people have the right to see him as such. His might upholds his Law, so by his Law he has that right, and by my standards, I have the right to hate and wish the utter destruction of his Law. \\\"I don\\\'t think it\\\'s practical to support a protection racket.\\\" So I say, \\\"Down with the Fire Nation(s) and their rule by terror.\\\"
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
Likewise, to Zuko, law is so much more important than life it completely overrides it for him; he doesn\'t kill for the hell of it(though Azula comes close), but unhesitatingly takes life if the law demands it(loads and loads of lethal traps, even on civilian conscripts). He specifically compares Aang to Ozai, saying they\'re key targets in the war, and neutrality wouldn\'t mean much if either side had a shot at the opposing target(\'\'\'though I really want to know how he\'ll feel about his father\'s Gordian solution to the War\'\'\'). He feels remorse, but its like Sam Gerard in Film/TheFugitive(\
to:
Likewise, to Zuko, law is so much more important than life it completely overrides it for him; he doesn\\\'t kill for the hell of it(though Azula comes close), but unhesitatingly takes life if the law demands it(loads and loads of lethal traps, even on civilian conscripts). He specifically compares Aang to Ozai, saying they\\\'re key targets in the war, and neutrality wouldn\\\'t mean much if either side had a shot at the opposing target(\\\'\\\'\\\'though I really want to know how he\\\'ll feel about his father\\\'s Gordian solution to the War\\\'\\\'\\\'). He feels remorse, but its like Sam Gerard in Film/TheFugitive(\\\"I didn\\\'t kill my wife!\\\" \\\"I don\\\'t care!\\\") - he does not let that get in the way of his duty in any way shape or form. To someone he\\\'s chased, it makes him look like a completely amoral monster.
The part that proves Zuko to be completely amoral to me? His disdain for Aang over breaking parole. He came to the South Pole with weapons and a great big ship, and laid down his Law; \\\"Give me the Avatar or people will suffer.\\\" Aang agrees to go with him to keep people from suffering, but Zuko seems to think he\\\'s done a great thing in threatening people to get his way.
\\\"The removal of a threat is not a payment, the negation of a negative is not a reward, the withdrawal of your armed hoodlums is not an incentive, the offer not to murder me is not a value.\\\"
He is a thug with a uniform, and people have the right to see him as such. His might upholds his Law, so by his Law he has that right, and by my standards, I have the right to hate and wish the utter destruction of his Law. \\\"I don\\\'t think it\\\'s practical to support a protection racket.\\\" So I say, \\\"Down with the Fire Nation(s) and their rule by terror.\\\"
The part that proves Zuko to be completely amoral to me? His disdain for Aang over breaking parole. He came to the South Pole with weapons and a great big ship, and laid down his Law; \\\"Give me the Avatar or people will suffer.\\\" Aang agrees to go with him to keep people from suffering, but Zuko seems to think he\\\'s done a great thing in threatening people to get his way.
\\\"The removal of a threat is not a payment, the negation of a negative is not a reward, the withdrawal of your armed hoodlums is not an incentive, the offer not to murder me is not a value.\\\"
He is a thug with a uniform, and people have the right to see him as such. His might upholds his Law, so by his Law he has that right, and by my standards, I have the right to hate and wish the utter destruction of his Law. \\\"I don\\\'t think it\\\'s practical to support a protection racket.\\\" So I say, \\\"Down with the Fire Nation(s) and their rule by terror.\\\"
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
Likewise, to Zuko, law is so much more important than life it completely overrides it for him; he doesn\'t kill for the hell of it(though Azula comes close), but unhesitatingly takes life if the law demands it(loads and loads of lethal traps, even on civilian conscripts). He specifically compares Aang to Ozai, saying they\'re key targets in the war, and neutrality wouldn\'t mean much if either side had a shot at the opposing target(\'\'\'though I really want to know how he\'ll feel about his father\'s Gordian solution to the War\'\'\'). He feels remorse, but its like Sam Gerard in Film/TheFugitive(\
to:
Likewise, to Zuko, law is so much more important than life it completely overrides it for him; he doesn\\\'t kill for the hell of it(though Azula comes close), but unhesitatingly takes life if the law demands it(loads and loads of lethal traps, even on civilian conscripts). He specifically compares Aang to Ozai, saying they\\\'re key targets in the war, and neutrality wouldn\\\'t mean much if either side had a shot at the opposing target(\\\'\\\'\\\'though I really want to know how he\\\'ll feel about his father\\\'s Gordian solution to the War\\\'\\\'\\\'). He feels remorse, but its like Sam Gerard in Film/TheFugitive(\\\"I didn\\\'t kill my wife!\\\" \\\"I don\\\'t care!\\\") - he does not let that get in the way of his duty in any way shape or form. To someone he\\\'s chased, it makes him look like a completely amoral monster.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
Likewise, to Zuko, life is so much more important than law it completely overrides it for him; he doesn\'t kill for the hell of it(though Azula comes close), but unhesitatingly takes life if the law demands it(loads and loads of lethal traps, even on civilian conscripts). He specifically compares Aang to Ozai, saying they\'re key targets in the war, and neutrality wouldn\'t mean much if either side had a shot at the opposing target(\'\'\'though I really want to know how he\'ll feel about his father\'s Gordian solution to the War\'\'\'). He feels remorse, but its like Sam Gerard in Film/TheFugitive(\
to:
Likewise, to Zuko, law is so much more important than life it completely overrides it for him; he doesn\\\'t kill for the hell of it(though Azula comes close), but unhesitatingly takes life if the law demands it(loads and loads of lethal traps, even on civilian conscripts). He specifically compares Aang to Ozai, saying they\\\'re key targets in the war, and neutrality wouldn\\\'t mean much if either side had a shot at the opposing target(\\\'\\\'\\\'though I really want to know how he\\\'ll feel about his father\\\'s Gordian solution to the War\\\'\\\'\\\'). He feels remorse, but its like Sam Gerard in Film/TheFugitive(\\\"I didn\\\'t kill my wife!\\\" \\\"I don\\\'t care!\\\") - he does not let that get in the way of his duty in any way shape or form. To someone he\\\'s chased, it makes him look like a terrifying monster.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
Likewise, to Zuko, life is so much more important than law it completely overrides it for him; he doesn\'t kill for the hell of it(though Azula comes close), but unhesitatingly takes life if the law demands it(loads and loads of lethal traps, even on civilian conscripts). He specifically compares Aang to Ozai, saying they\'re key targets in the war, and neutrality wouldn\'t mean much if either side had a shot at the opposing target(\'\'\'though I really want to know how he\'ll feel about his father\'s Gordian solution to the War\'\'\'). He feels remorse, but its like Sam Gerard in Film/TheFugitive(\
to:
Likewise, to Zuko, law is so much more important than life it completely overrides it for him; he doesn\\\'t kill for the hell of it(though Azula comes close), but unhesitatingly takes life if the law demands it(loads and loads of lethal traps, even on civilian conscripts). He specifically compares Aang to Ozai, saying they\\\'re key targets in the war, and neutrality wouldn\\\'t mean much if either side had a shot at the opposing target(\\\'\\\'\\\'though I really want to know how he\\\'ll feel about his father\\\'s Gordian solution to the War\\\'\\\'\\\'). He feels remorse, but its like Sam Gerard in Film/TheFugitive(\\\"I didn\\\'t kill my wife!\\\" \\\"I don\\\'t care!\\\") - he does not let that get in the way of his duty in any way shape or form. To someone he\\\'s chased, it makes him look like a terrifying monster.
