[005]
216.99.32.42
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Including subtypes seems like a good idea. But Romantic Stu sounds like a male RelationshipSue and Loser Stu seems to be just an AntiSue combined with a LemonStu, not to say they can\'t be added, of course. In fact, I think it\'s a good idea to add these subtypes.
to:
Including subtypes seems like a good idea. But Romantic Stu sounds like a male RelationshipSue and Loser Stu seems to be just AntiSue [[XMeetsY meets]] LemonStu, not to say they can\\\'t be added, of course. In fact, I think it\\\'s a good idea to add these subtypes.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Including subtypes seems like a good idea. But Romantic Stu sounds like a male RelationshipSue and Loser Stu seems to be just a male AntiSue, not to say they can\'t be added, of course. In fact, I think it\'s a good idea to add these subtypes.
to:
Including subtypes seems like a good idea. But Romantic Stu sounds like a male RelationshipSue and Loser Stu seems to be just an AntiSue combined with a LemonStu, not to say they can\\\'t be added, of course. In fact, I think it\\\'s a good idea to add these subtypes.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Including subtypes seems like a good idea. But Romantic Stu sounds like a male RelationshipSue and Loser Stu seems to be just a male AntiSue; not to say they can\'t be added, of course.
to:
Including subtypes seems like a good idea. But Romantic Stu sounds like a male RelationshipSue and Loser Stu seems to be just a male AntiSue, not to say they can\\\'t be added, of course. In fact, I think it\\\'s a good idea to add these subtypes.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Including subtypes seems like a good idea. But Romantic Stu sounds like a male RelationshipSue and Loser Stu seems to be just a male AntiSue; not to say they can\'t be added, of course, just that they\'re already their-own tropes.
to:
Including subtypes seems like a good idea. But Romantic Stu sounds like a male RelationshipSue and Loser Stu seems to be just a male AntiSue; not to say they can\\\'t be added, of course.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Including subtypes seems like a good idea. But Romantic Stu sounds like a male RelationshipSue and Loser Stu seems to be just a male AntiSue, not to say they can\'t be added, of course.
to:
Including subtypes seems like a good idea. But Romantic Stu sounds like a male RelationshipSue and Loser Stu seems to be just a male AntiSue; not to say they can\\\'t be added, of course, just that they\\\'re already their-own tropes.
