[014]
216.99.32.42
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Should the description on this page be rewritten? As this is the main page it should be describing the series and its common mechanics, overall plot, history, cultural impact, etc. as a whole, yet after the first two paragraphs doing that fairly well before it starts gushing about the first two games while giving all others only a token mention.
to:
Should the description on this page be rewritten? As this is the main page it should be describing the series and its common mechanics, overall plot, history, cultural impact, etc. as a whole, yet after the first two paragraphs doing that fairly well it starts gushing about the first two games while giving all others only a token mention.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Should the description on this page be rewritten? As this is the main page it should be describing the series and its mechanics/overall plot as a whole, yet after the first two paragraphs doing that fairly well before it starts gushing about the first two games while giving all others only a token mention.
to:
Should the description on this page be rewritten? As this is the main page it should be describing the series and its common mechanics, overall plot, history, cultural impact, etc. as a whole, yet after the first two paragraphs doing that fairly well before it starts gushing about the first two games while giving all others only a token mention.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
That, and the 3rd and 4th paragraphs are pretty weak in what they are trying to convey. Character customization and the options to choose between being good, bad, or flat out evil are standard affair in an RPG. Either a better, more Fallout-esqe example should be used or, if Fallout was one of the earliest examples, then note that it is a case of SeinfeldIsUnfunny.
to:
That, and the 3rd and 4th paragraphs are pretty weak in what they are trying to convey. Character customization and the options to choose between being good, bad, or flat out evil are standard affair in an RPG, yet the description implies that it is something special. Either a better, more Fallout-esqe example should be used or, if the idea is to note that Fallout was one of the earliest examples and is therefore a case of SeinfeldIsUnfunny then should be noted as such.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
That, and the 3rd and 4th paragraphs are pretty weak in what they are trying to convey. \
to:
That, and the 3rd and 4th paragraphs are pretty weak in what they are trying to convey. Character customization and the options to choose between being good, bad, or flat out evil are standard affair in an RPG. Either a better, more Fallout-esqe example should be used or, if Fallout was one of the earliest examples, then note that it is a case of SeinfeldIsUnfunny.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Should the description be rewritten on this page? As this is the main page it should be describing the series and its mechanics/overall plot as a whole, yet after the first two paragraphs doing that fairly well before it starts gushing about the first two games while giving all others only a token mention.
to:
Should the description on this page be rewritten? As this is the main page it should be describing the series and its mechanics/overall plot as a whole, yet after the first two paragraphs doing that fairly well before it starts gushing about the first two games while giving all others only a token mention.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
That, and the 3rd and 4th paragraphs are pretty weak in what they are trying to convey. \
to:
That, and the 3rd and 4th paragraphs are pretty weak in what they are trying to convey. \\\"You can customize your character, including their age, sex, and skills! In an RPG! Ain\\\'t that cool!?\\\" and \\\"This franchise allows unparalleled freedom! When presented with a choice you can choose a good, bad, or evil option! In an RPG! Isn\\\'t that neat!?\\\"
