[002]
sovvil2008@yahoo.co.uk
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Should we revert the definitions on the CE page back to how it originally was? To be fair, even though CE characters don\'t need to do evil for no reason and NE characters can do evil for the sake of doing evil we have our own definitions of the alignment system, right?
to:
So ummm....
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Should we revert the definitions on the CE page back to how it originally was? To be fair, even though CE characters don\'t need to do evil for no reason and NE characters can do evil for the sake of doing evil we have our own definitions of the alignment system, right? Seriously what is wrong with this description:
to:
Should we revert the definitions on the CE page back to how it originally was? To be fair, even though CE characters don\\\'t need to do evil for no reason and NE characters can do evil for the sake of doing evil we have our own definitions of the alignment system, right?
