Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion History Trivia / SFDebris

Go To

[005] Brainbin Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
The problem with that is, if we include \'\'Series/DoctorWho\'\', we\'re bound to include all of his \'\'other\'\' frequently-reviewed properties, too - which could make the page unmanageable. Focusing on \'\'Franchise/StarTrek\'\' makes sense because he\'s done more of it than all of his other reviews \'\'combined\'\', and it\'s generally what he\'s known for above all else - it\'s also the only one he has the fun recurring sub-categories for.
to:
The problem with that is, if we include \\\'\\\'Series/DoctorWho\\\'\\\', we\\\'re bound to include all of his \\\'\\\'other\\\'\\\' frequently-reviewed properties, too - which could make the page unmanageable. Focusing on \\\'\\\'Franchise/StarTrek\\\'\\\' makes sense because he\\\'s done more of it than all of his other reviews \\\'\\\'combined\\\'\\\', and it\\\'s generally what he\\\'s known for above all else - it\\\'s also the only one for which he has the fun recurring sub-categories.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
The problem with that is, if we include \'\'Series/DoctorWho\'\', we\'re bound to include all of his other frequently-reviewed properties, too - which could make the page unmanageable. Focusing on \'\'Franchise/StarTrek\'\' makes sense because he\'s done more of it than all of his other reviews \'\'combined\'\', and it\'s generally what he\'s known for above all else - it\'s also the only one he has the fun recurring sub-categories for.
to:
The problem with that is, if we include \\\'\\\'Series/DoctorWho\\\'\\\', we\\\'re bound to include all of his \\\'\\\'other\\\'\\\' frequently-reviewed properties, too - which could make the page unmanageable. Focusing on \\\'\\\'Franchise/StarTrek\\\'\\\' makes sense because he\\\'s done more of it than all of his other reviews \\\'\\\'combined\\\'\\\', and it\\\'s generally what he\\\'s known for above all else - it\\\'s also the only one he has the fun recurring sub-categories for.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
The problem with that is, if we include \'\'Series/DoctorWho\'\', we\'re bound to include all of his other frequently-reviewed properties, too - which could make the page unmanageable. Focusing on \'\'Franchise/StarTrek\'\' makes sense because he\'s done more of it than all of his other reviews \'\'combined\'\', and it\'s also the only one he has the fun recurring sub-categories for.
to:
The problem with that is, if we include \\\'\\\'Series/DoctorWho\\\'\\\', we\\\'re bound to include all of his other frequently-reviewed properties, too - which could make the page unmanageable. Focusing on \\\'\\\'Franchise/StarTrek\\\'\\\' makes sense because he\\\'s done more of it than all of his other reviews \\\'\\\'combined\\\'\\\', and it\\\'s generally what he\\\'s known for above all else - it\\\'s also the only one he has the fun recurring sub-categories for.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
The problem with that is, if we include \'\'Series/DoctorWho\'\', we\'re bound to include all of his other frequently-reviewed properties, too - which could make the page unmanageable. Focusing on \'\'Franchise/StarTrek\'\' makes sense because he\'s done more of it than all of his other reviews \'\'combined\'\', and it\'s also the only one he has sub-categories for.
to:
The problem with that is, if we include \\\'\\\'Series/DoctorWho\\\'\\\', we\\\'re bound to include all of his other frequently-reviewed properties, too - which could make the page unmanageable. Focusing on \\\'\\\'Franchise/StarTrek\\\'\\\' makes sense because he\\\'s done more of it than all of his other reviews \\\'\\\'combined\\\'\\\', and it\\\'s also the only one he has the fun recurring sub-categories for.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
The problem with that is, if we include Doctor Who, we\'re bound to include all of his other frequently-reviewed properties, too - which could make the page unmanageable. Focusing on Star Trek makes sense because he\'s done more of it than all of his other reviews \'\'combined\'\', and it\'s also the only one he has sub-categories for.
to:
The problem with that is, if we include \\\'\\\'Series/DoctorWho\\\'\\\', we\\\'re bound to include all of his other frequently-reviewed properties, too - which could make the page unmanageable. Focusing on \\\'\\\'Franchise/StarTrek\\\'\\\' makes sense because he\\\'s done more of it than all of his other reviews \\\'\\\'combined\\\'\\\', and it\\\'s also the only one he has sub-categories for.
Top