[004]
supergod
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Why not 85% for some genres? I think people take the actual number way too seriously, treating it as if it has been scientifically determined. The main point he was making is that science fiction is not inherently worse than mainstream fiction. Used as an serious statistic, this fails because:
to:
Why not 85% for some genres? I think people take the actual number way too seriously, treating it as if it has been scientifically determined. The main point he was making is that science fiction is not inherently worse than mainstream fiction. All that matters is that \\\'\\\'mostly\\\'\\\' everything sucks, not exactly 90%. Used as an serious statistic, this fails because:
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Why not 85% for some genres? I think people take the number way too seriously. The main point he was making is that science fiction is not inherently worse than mainstream fiction. Used as an serious law, this fails because:
to:
Why not 85% for some genres? I think people take the actual number way too seriously, treating it as if it has been scientifically determined. The main point he was making is that science fiction is not inherently worse than mainstream fiction. Used as an serious statistic, this fails because:
Changed line(s) 4 from:
n
* 2) Even if it was possible, people wouldn\'t be able to agree on what is or isn\'t crap
to:
* 2) Even if they could, people wouldn\\\'t be able to agree on what is or isn\\\'t crap
