[003]
216.99.32.42
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
In the above post, the second part is pretty much my brain wandering off and over-thinking the implications of the plot. I tend to think about works of fiction as if they were infinitely complex and internally consistent settings, only thinking of them as a story when the creators destroy my willing suspension of disbelief. So while my thoughts on
the engineers implications for abrahamic theology are valid (and are probably the conclusion some religious people in-universe would come to if the Weyland company made the knowledge public, which they won\'t), they are too far removed from the contents of the actual story to belong in this discussion. Sorry about that. Also does anyone else find themselves being more pedantic when they writes? or is it just some weird tic I have?
the engineers implications for abrahamic theology are valid (and are probably the conclusion some religious people in-universe would come to if the Weyland company made the knowledge public, which they won\'t), they are too far removed from the contents of the actual story to belong in this discussion. Sorry about that. Also does anyone else find themselves being more pedantic when they writes? or is it just some weird tic I have?
to:
In the above post, the second part is pretty much my brain wandering off and over-thinking the implications of the plot. I tend to think about works of fiction as if they were infinitely complex and internally consistent settings, only thinking of them as a story when the creators destroy my willing suspension of disbelief. So while my thoughts on the engineers implications for abrahamic theology are partially valid (and are probably the conclusion some religious people in-universe would come to if the Weyland company made the knowledge public, which they won\\\'t), they are too far removed from the contents of the actual story to belong in this discussion. Sorry about that. Also does anyone else find themselves being more pedantic when they writes? or is it just some weird tic I have?
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
And yet, perhaps ironically, TVTropes itself doesn\'t allow camelcase in names or titles as it uses them as wick indicators. As such, my name seems to constantly feature a space that isn\'t actually there.
To clarify... My name is ONE word, with both the S and the C capitalised. NO SPACE. Yet if I write \
To clarify... My name is ONE word, with both the S and the C capitalised. NO SPACE. Yet if I write \
to:
Naturally CamelCase names (like my own) need to apply for special display status here on TVTropes, o\\\'course... mostly on account of CamelCase being used for wicks by default.
Bit of a nuisance for me, personally.
Bit of a nuisance for me, personally.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
And yet, perhaps ironically, TVTropes itself doesn\'t allow camelcase in names or titles. As such, my name seems to constantly feature a space that isn\'t actually there.
to:
And yet, perhaps ironically, TVTropes itself doesn\\\'t allow camelcase in names or titles as it uses them as wick indicators. As such, my name seems to constantly feature a space that isn\\\'t actually there.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
To clarify... my name is written \'SotiCoto\' ... One word, with both the S and the C capitalised. NO SPACE.
to:
To clarify... My name is ONE word, with both the S and the C capitalised. NO SPACE. Yet if I write \\\"SotiCoto\\\" here... it assumes the use of camelcase is a wick or something.
