[006]
EmmaWoodhouse18
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
How do we add to disagree with something that has been proposed, without making it look like Natter? Can we get rid of ones that we think have no business being here and are clearly being added either by overzealous MoralGuardians, or by people against the policy trying to \
to:
How do we add to disagree with something that has been proposed, without making it look like Natter? Can we get rid of ones that clearly have no business being here and are just being added either by overzealous MoralGuardians, or by people against the policy trying to \\\"prove a point\\\"? (For example, \\\'\\\'SailorMoon\\\'\\\'. I got it rid of it since I figured the person was just trolling and someone had responded with a -__- but please let me know if I should have edited it rather than removed it.)
For example, I was going to add something to the \\\'\\\'Cupcakes\\\'\\\' proposal in line with what was said in the above discussion post; it\\\'s gross and basically {{Gorn}}, but unlike \\\'\\\'Sweet Apple Massacre\\\'\\\' it isn\\\'t sexual, and it should also be kept as pretty much the Most Triumphant Example within the \\\'\\\'My Little Pony\\\'\\\' fandom of an extremely DarkFic and BileFascination.
For example, I was going to add something to the \\\'\\\'Cupcakes\\\'\\\' proposal in line with what was said in the above discussion post; it\\\'s gross and basically {{Gorn}}, but unlike \\\'\\\'Sweet Apple Massacre\\\'\\\' it isn\\\'t sexual, and it should also be kept as pretty much the Most Triumphant Example within the \\\'\\\'My Little Pony\\\'\\\' fandom of an extremely DarkFic and BileFascination.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
How do we add to disagree with something that has been proposed, without making it look like Natter? Can we get rid of ones that we think have no business being here and are clearly being added either by overzealous MoralGuardians, or by people against the policy trying to \
to:
How do we add to disagree with something that has been proposed, without making it look like Natter? Can we get rid of ones that we think have no business being here and are clearly being added either by overzealous MoralGuardians, or by people against the policy trying to \\\"prove a point\\\"? (For example, \\\'\\\'SailorMoon\\\'\\\'. I got it rid of it since I figured the person was just trolling and someone had responded with a -__- but please let me know if I should have edited it rather than removed it.)
For example, I was going to add something to the \\\'\\\'Cupcakes\\\'\\\' proposal in line with what was said in the above discussion post; it\\\'s gross and basically {{Gorn}}, but unlike \\\'\\\'Sweet Apple Massacre\\\'\\\' it isn\\\'t sexual, and it should also be kept as pretty much the Most Triumphant Example within the \\\'\\\'My Little Pony\\\'\\\' fandom of an extremely DarkFic and BileFascination.
For example, I was going to add something to the \\\'\\\'Cupcakes\\\'\\\' proposal in line with what was said in the above discussion post; it\\\'s gross and basically {{Gorn}}, but unlike \\\'\\\'Sweet Apple Massacre\\\'\\\' it isn\\\'t sexual, and it should also be kept as pretty much the Most Triumphant Example within the \\\'\\\'My Little Pony\\\'\\\' fandom of an extremely DarkFic and BileFascination.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
How do we add to disagree with something that has been proposed, without making it look like Natter? Can we get rid of ones that we think have no business being here and are clearly being added either by overzealous MoralGuardians, or by people against the policy trying to \
to:
How do we add to disagree with something that has been proposed, without making it look like Natter? Can we get rid of ones that we think have no business being here and are clearly being added either by overzealous MoralGuardians, or by people against the policy trying to \\\"prove a point\\\"? (For example, \\\'\\\'SailorMoon\\\'\\\'.)
For example, I was going to add something to the \\\'\\\'Cupcakes\\\'\\\' proposal in line with what was said in the above discussion post; it\\\'s gross and basically {{Gorn}}, but unlike \\\'\\\'Sweet Apple Massacre\\\'\\\' it isn\\\'t sexual, and it should also be kept as pretty much the Most Triumphant Example within the \\\'\\\'My Little Pony\\\'\\\' fandom of an extremely DarkFic and BileFascination.
For example, I was going to add something to the \\\'\\\'Cupcakes\\\'\\\' proposal in line with what was said in the above discussion post; it\\\'s gross and basically {{Gorn}}, but unlike \\\'\\\'Sweet Apple Massacre\\\'\\\' it isn\\\'t sexual, and it should also be kept as pretty much the Most Triumphant Example within the \\\'\\\'My Little Pony\\\'\\\' fandom of an extremely DarkFic and BileFascination.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
How do we add to disagree with something that has been proposed, without making it look like Natter? Can we get rid of ones that we think have no business being here and are clearly being added either be the overzealous, or by people against the policy trying to \
to:
How do we add to disagree with something that has been proposed, without making it look like Natter? Can we get rid of ones that we think have no business being here and are clearly being added either by overzealous MoralGuardians, or by people against the policy trying to \\\"prove a point\\\"? (For example, \\\'\\\'SailorMoon\\\'\\\'.)
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
How do we add to disagree with something that has been proposed? Can we get rid of ones that we think have no business being here and are clearly being added either be the overzealous, or by people against the policy trying to \
to:
How do we add to disagree with something that has been proposed, without making it look like Natter? Can we get rid of ones that we think have no business being here and are clearly being added either be the overzealous, or by people against the policy trying to \\\"prove a point\\\"? (For example, \\\'\\\'SailorMoon\\\'\\\'.)
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
While it would\'ve setteled the issue with DT, what would the lesson to Celestia be?
to:
While it would\\\'ve settled the issue with DT, what would the lesson to Celestia be?
