[004]
TheMalignancy
Current Version
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
A genuinely good writer would have let the Doctor die, allowed his years of hypocrisy and righteous bullshit to finally catch up with him. They\'d have made it so Rory and Amy saved him (or rather, arranged for him to be saved), or River, or anyone other than the Doctor himself. Moffat just asspulled it whilst tossing off to the Doctor\'s amazing brilliance some more.
to:
A genuinely good writer would have let the Doctor die, allowed his years of hypocrisy and righteous bullshit to finally catch up with him. They\\\'d have made it so Rory and Amy saved him (or rather, arranged for him to be saved), or River, or literally \\\'\\\'anyone\\\'\\\' other than the Doctor himself. Moffat just asspulled it whilst tossing off to the Doctor\\\'s amazing brilliance some more.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
A genuinely good writer would have let the Doctor die, allowed his years of hypocrisy and righteous bullshit to finally catch up with him. They\'d have made it so Rory and Amy saved him (or rather, arranged for him to be saved), or River, or anyone other than the Doctor himself. Moffat just asspulled it whilst tossing off to the Doctor some more.
to:
A genuinely good writer would have let the Doctor die, allowed his years of hypocrisy and righteous bullshit to finally catch up with him. They\\\'d have made it so Rory and Amy saved him (or rather, arranged for him to be saved), or River, or anyone other than the Doctor himself. Moffat just asspulled it whilst tossing off to the Doctor\\\'s amazing brilliance some more.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
That\'s the point. From any logical viewpoint they have no reason whatsoever to stop River from killing the Doctor or to stop the Doctor himself from dying. He\'s killed more people than any other ten of their other war criminals put together. As for it being defensible, that\'s just stupid. River want to kill the Doctor is also perfectly defensible from a certain point of view, and they sure as hell didn\'t give a shit about that.
to:
That\\\'s the point. From any logical viewpoint they have no reason whatsoever to stop River from killing the Doctor or to stop the Doctor himself from dying. He\\\'s killed more people than any other ten of their other war criminals put together. As for it being defensible, that\\\'s just stupid. River want to kill the Doctor is also perfectly defensible from a certain point of view, and they sure as hell didn\\\'t give a shit about that.
A genuinely good writer would have let the Doctor die, allowed his years of hypocrisy and righteous bullshit to finally catch up with him. They\\\'d have made it so Rory and Amy saved him (or rather, arranged for him to be saved), or River, or anyone other than the Doctor himself. Moffat just asspulled it whilst tossing off to the Doctor some more.
A genuinely good writer would have let the Doctor die, allowed his years of hypocrisy and righteous bullshit to finally catch up with him. They\\\'d have made it so Rory and Amy saved him (or rather, arranged for him to be saved), or River, or anyone other than the Doctor himself. Moffat just asspulled it whilst tossing off to the Doctor some more.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
That\'s the point. From any logical viewpoint they have no reason whatsoever to stop River from killing the Doctor or to stop the Doctor himself from dying. As for it being defensible, that\'s just stupid. River want to kill the Doctor is also perfectly defensible from a certain point of view, and they sure as hell didn\'t give a shit about that.
to:
That\\\'s the point. From any logical viewpoint they have no reason whatsoever to stop River from killing the Doctor or to stop the Doctor himself from dying. He\\\'s killed more people than any other ten of their other war criminals put together. As for it being defensible, that\\\'s just stupid. River want to kill the Doctor is also perfectly defensible from a certain point of view, and they sure as hell didn\\\'t give a shit about that.
