[002]
TrevMUN
Current Version
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
-->23rd May \'11 5:01:02 PM \'\'\'smheath\'\'
to:
-->23rd May \\\'11 5:01:02 PM \\\'\\\'\\\'smheath\\\'\\\'\\\'
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
-->*** \
to:
-->*** \\\"Vegetable\\\" is not a botanical term. Lots of vegetables, such as cucumbers, peppers, squash, eggplant, olives, and even \\\'\\\'corn\\\'\\\', are fruits.
Another case of ConversationInTheMainPage, where smheath just couldn\\\'t resist [[RepairDontRespond replying]] to an example rather than altering whatever they thought was wrong.
The problem is, I can\\\'t see where this was even necessary. While \\\"vegetable\\\" may not be recognized as a botanical term, \\\"fruit\\\" very much \\\'\\\'is\\\'\\\'--and the culinary and botanical definitions of \\\"fruit\\\" mostly overlap. Which means the tomato example is \\\'\\\'still\\\'\\\' a case of calling a fruit a vegetable.
Another case of ConversationInTheMainPage, where smheath just couldn\\\'t resist [[RepairDontRespond replying]] to an example rather than altering whatever they thought was wrong.
The problem is, I can\\\'t see where this was even necessary. While \\\"vegetable\\\" may not be recognized as a botanical term, \\\"fruit\\\" very much \\\'\\\'is\\\'\\\'--and the culinary and botanical definitions of \\\"fruit\\\" mostly overlap. Which means the tomato example is \\\'\\\'still\\\'\\\' a case of calling a fruit a vegetable.
