[004]
dondon151
Current Version
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
It\'s really difficult to provide the criteria in layman\'s terms so that any guy would understand them. I\'ve already included that disclaimer about anyone being able to be a gamebreaker, and the fact that gamebreakers are supposed to trivialize the entire game doesn\'t stop guys like Gamet from thinking that a mediocre unit \
to:
It\\\'s really difficult to provide the criteria in layman\\\'s terms so that any guy would understand them. I\\\'ve already included that disclaimer about anyone being able to be a gamebreaker, and the fact that gamebreakers are supposed to trivialize the entire game doesn\\\'t stop guys like Gamet from thinking that a mediocre unit \\\"dominating\\\" one chapter in a game with over 40 chapters (after substantial abuse) is gamebreaking.
I also don\\\'t believe that any FE6 character falls under these criteria. I\\\'ve already pointed out the characters that trivialize large sections of the game but fail to do so for its entirety due to their poor growths or imperfect availability.
@Gamet
You are certainly correct that Elincia\\\'s Amiti is restricted to a few chapters. That is exactly why she\\\'s not a gamebreaker. Other things that are restricted to a few chapters are either not listed or are covered under the \\\"anyone can be a gamebreaker\\\" clause.
Furthermore, Elincia\\\'s perceived dominance of 4-E-3 is trivial because there is a much faster way to break that chapter. It is very possible to 1 turn clear 4-E-3 while only killing one generic red dragon (see http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sXveFiQL4w4). If this strategy obsoletes whatever Elincia does in terms of brokenness, then clearly, Elincia is not very broken because she is much worse at it. If anything, this solidifies the fact that laguz royals + Rafiel is broken for that one particular map.
Finally, arbitrary restrictions aren\\\'t indicative of a normal playthrough where characters are allowed to be used to their full potential. I don\\\'t really care if you accuse us of \\\"holding to ridiculous standards;\\\" that is really the only way of figuring out who or what is really broken vs. just simply good, and we don\\\'t want this page to be saturated with a billion examples.
I also don\\\'t believe that any FE6 character falls under these criteria. I\\\'ve already pointed out the characters that trivialize large sections of the game but fail to do so for its entirety due to their poor growths or imperfect availability.
@Gamet
You are certainly correct that Elincia\\\'s Amiti is restricted to a few chapters. That is exactly why she\\\'s not a gamebreaker. Other things that are restricted to a few chapters are either not listed or are covered under the \\\"anyone can be a gamebreaker\\\" clause.
Furthermore, Elincia\\\'s perceived dominance of 4-E-3 is trivial because there is a much faster way to break that chapter. It is very possible to 1 turn clear 4-E-3 while only killing one generic red dragon (see http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sXveFiQL4w4). If this strategy obsoletes whatever Elincia does in terms of brokenness, then clearly, Elincia is not very broken because she is much worse at it. If anything, this solidifies the fact that laguz royals + Rafiel is broken for that one particular map.
Finally, arbitrary restrictions aren\\\'t indicative of a normal playthrough where characters are allowed to be used to their full potential. I don\\\'t really care if you accuse us of \\\"holding to ridiculous standards;\\\" that is really the only way of figuring out who or what is really broken vs. just simply good, and we don\\\'t want this page to be saturated with a billion examples.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
It\'s really difficult to provide the criteria in layman\'s terms so that any guy would understand them. I\'ve already included that disclaimer about anyone being able to be a gamebreaker, and the fact that gamebreakers are supposed to trivialize the entire game doesn\'t stop guys like Gamet from thinking that a mediocre unit \
to:
It\\\'s really difficult to provide the criteria in layman\\\'s terms so that any guy would understand them. I\\\'ve already included that disclaimer about anyone being able to be a gamebreaker, and the fact that gamebreakers are supposed to trivialize the entire game doesn\\\'t stop guys like Gamet from thinking that a mediocre unit \\\"dominating\\\" one chapter in a game with over 40 chapters (after substantial abuse) is gamebreaking.
I also don\\\'t believe that any FE6 character falls under these criteria. I\\\'ve already pointed out the characters that trivialize large sections of the game but fail to do so for its entirety due to their poor growths or imperfect availability.
@Gamet
You are certainly correct that Elincia\\\'s Amiti is restricted to a few chapters. That is exactly why she\\\'s not a gamebreaker. Other things that are restricted to a few chapters are either not listed or are covered under the \\\"anyone can be a gamebreaker\\\" clause.
Furthermore, Elincia\\\'s perceived dominance of 4-E-3 is trivial because there is a much faster way to break that chapter. It is very possible to 1 turn clear 4-E-3 while only killing one generic red dragon (see http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sXveFiQL4w4). If this strategy obsoletes whatever Elincia does in terms of brokenness, then clearly, Elincia is not very broken because she is much worse at it. If anything, this solidifies the fact that laguz royals + Rafiel is broken for that one particular map.
Finally, arbitrary restrictions aren\\\'t indicative of a normal playthrough where characters are allowed to be used to their full potential.
I also don\\\'t believe that any FE6 character falls under these criteria. I\\\'ve already pointed out the characters that trivialize large sections of the game but fail to do so for its entirety due to their poor growths or imperfect availability.
@Gamet
You are certainly correct that Elincia\\\'s Amiti is restricted to a few chapters. That is exactly why she\\\'s not a gamebreaker. Other things that are restricted to a few chapters are either not listed or are covered under the \\\"anyone can be a gamebreaker\\\" clause.
Furthermore, Elincia\\\'s perceived dominance of 4-E-3 is trivial because there is a much faster way to break that chapter. It is very possible to 1 turn clear 4-E-3 while only killing one generic red dragon (see http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sXveFiQL4w4). If this strategy obsoletes whatever Elincia does in terms of brokenness, then clearly, Elincia is not very broken because she is much worse at it. If anything, this solidifies the fact that laguz royals + Rafiel is broken for that one particular map.
Finally, arbitrary restrictions aren\\\'t indicative of a normal playthrough where characters are allowed to be used to their full potential.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
It\'s really difficult to provide the criteria in layman\'s terms so that any guy would understand them. I\'ve already included that disclaimer about anyone being able to be a gamebreaker, and the fact that gamebreakers are supposed to trivialize the entire game doesn\'t stop guys like Gamet from thinking that a mediocre unit dominating one chapter in a game with over 40 chapters is gamebreaking.
to:
It\\\'s really difficult to provide the criteria in layman\\\'s terms so that any guy would understand them. I\\\'ve already included that disclaimer about anyone being able to be a gamebreaker, and the fact that gamebreakers are supposed to trivialize the entire game doesn\\\'t stop guys like Gamet from thinking that a mediocre unit \\\"dominating\\\" one chapter in a game with over 40 chapters (after substantial abuse) is gamebreaking.
Changed line(s) 9 from:
n
You are certainly correct that Elincia\'s Amiti is restricted to a few chapters. That is exactly why she\'s not a gamebreaker. Other things that are restricted to a few chapters are either not listed or are covered under the \
to:
You are certainly correct that Elincia\\\'s Amiti is restricted to a few chapters. That is exactly why she\\\'s not a gamebreaker. Other things that are restricted to a few chapters are either not listed or are covered under the \\\"anyone can be a gamebreaker\\\" clause.
Furthermore, Elincia\\\'s perceived dominance of 4-E-3 is trivial because there is a much faster way to break that chapter. It is very possible to 1 turn clear 4-E-3 while only killing one generic red dragon (see http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sXveFiQL4w4). If this strategy obsoletes whatever Elincia does in terms of brokenness, then clearly, Elincia is not very broken because she is much worse at it. If anything, this solidifies the fact that laguz royals + Rafiel is broken for that one particular map.
Furthermore, Elincia\\\'s perceived dominance of 4-E-3 is trivial because there is a much faster way to break that chapter. It is very possible to 1 turn clear 4-E-3 while only killing one generic red dragon (see http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sXveFiQL4w4). If this strategy obsoletes whatever Elincia does in terms of brokenness, then clearly, Elincia is not very broken because she is much worse at it. If anything, this solidifies the fact that laguz royals + Rafiel is broken for that one particular map.
