[003]
WonSab
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Raven, we\'ve been over this on numerous occasions before: the article does not have to be absolutely, every-eventuality, one-hundred-percent perfect. How does knowing that you can safely make a profit from your Wonders if you don\'t let anyone touch them -- a long-shot option implicit in the information that touching causes Havoc -- benefit the article in a way that outweighs the loss of brevity caused by adding these extraneous qualifying statements?
to:
Raven, we\\\'ve been over this on numerous occasions before: the article does not have to be absolutely, every-eventuality, one-hundred-percent perfect in its coverage. How does knowing that you can safely make a profit from your Wonders if you don\\\'t let anyone touch them -- a long-shot option implicit in the information that touching causes Havoc -- benefit the article in a way that outweighs the loss of brevity caused by adding these extraneous qualifying statements?
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Raven, we\'ve been over this on numerous occasions before: the article does not have to be one-hundred percent, absolutely, every-eventuality perfect. How does knowing that you can safely make a profit from your Wonders if you don\'t let anyone touch them -- a long-shot option implicit in the information that touching causes Havoc -- benefit the article in a way that outweighs the loss of brevity caused by adding these extraneous qualifying statements?
to:
Raven, we\\\'ve been over this on numerous occasions before: the article does not have to be absolutely, every-eventuality, one-hundred-percent perfect. How does knowing that you can safely make a profit from your Wonders if you don\\\'t let anyone touch them -- a long-shot option implicit in the information that touching causes Havoc -- benefit the article in a way that outweighs the loss of brevity caused by adding these extraneous qualifying statements?
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Raven, we\'ve been over this on numerous occasions before: the article does not have to be one-hundred percent, absolutely, every-eventuality perfect. How does knowing that you can safely make a profit from your Wonders if you don\'t let anyone touch them -- a long-shot option implicit in the information that touching causes Havoc -- benefit the article in a way that outweighs the loss of brevity cause by adding these extraneous qualifying statements?
to:
Raven, we\\\'ve been over this on numerous occasions before: the article does not have to be one-hundred percent, absolutely, every-eventuality perfect. How does knowing that you can safely make a profit from your Wonders if you don\\\'t let anyone touch them -- a long-shot option implicit in the information that touching causes Havoc -- benefit the article in a way that outweighs the loss of brevity caused by adding these extraneous qualifying statements?
