[006]
ConcernedCitizen
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
One of the recs in the fic recs section is by a known plagiariser.
to:
One of the recs in the fic recs section is by a known plagiarist.
Changed line(s) 0 from:
to:
One of the recs in the fic recs section is by a known plagiariser.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Not it\'s not situational sexuality. As taken from that thread, and in my YMMV discussion post. \
to:
Not it\\\'s not situational sexuality. As taken from that thread, and in my YMMV discussion post. \\\"My point is that their actions don\\\'t change, yet some people are deciding that their inference is enough to suggest the characters alter their preferences at the player\\\'s whim. Even IF they did, I\\\'m not sure that would be a crime. Regardless, IT\\\'S NOT THE CASE.\\\" That\\\'s a direct David Gaider quote, the Lead Writer. Caps emphasis mine.
I could interpret that the Dragon Age series is all about cheese because the wonderfulness of cheese as it has been mentioned in both games. I\\\'d be wrong but I\\\'m perfectly free to make the interpretation.
Bottom line is they do not have situational sexuality. Isabela is undeniably bi, Karl was still Anders first even if he romances a F!Hawke even if it\\\'s not mentioned (again word of Gaider), Merrill will gladly make positive remarks about a female Hawke who doesn\\\'t romance her and even Fenris has some vaguely flirty lines for an unflirted, unromanced male hawke and he\\\'ll still end up sleeping with Isabela if neither is romanced by the PC. Everyone is bi sorry. At best the argument could be made for SingleTargetSexuality in Merrill as I don\\\'t know of any flirt lines for her to someone besides Hawke. Which doesn\\\'t mean they don\\\'t exist.
I could interpret that the Dragon Age series is all about cheese because the wonderfulness of cheese as it has been mentioned in both games. I\\\'d be wrong but I\\\'m perfectly free to make the interpretation.
Bottom line is they do not have situational sexuality. Isabela is undeniably bi, Karl was still Anders first even if he romances a F!Hawke even if it\\\'s not mentioned (again word of Gaider), Merrill will gladly make positive remarks about a female Hawke who doesn\\\'t romance her and even Fenris has some vaguely flirty lines for an unflirted, unromanced male hawke and he\\\'ll still end up sleeping with Isabela if neither is romanced by the PC. Everyone is bi sorry. At best the argument could be made for SingleTargetSexuality in Merrill as I don\\\'t know of any flirt lines for her to someone besides Hawke. Which doesn\\\'t mean they don\\\'t exist.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Not it\'s not situational sexuality. As taken from that thread, and in my YMMV discussion post. \
to:
Not it\\\'s not situational sexuality. As taken from that thread, and in my YMMV discussion post. \\\"My point is that their actions don\\\'t change, yet some people are deciding that their inference is enough to suggest the characters alter their preferences at the player\\\'s whim. Even IF they did, I\\\'m not sure that would be a crime. Regardless, IT\\\'S NOT THE CASE.\\\" That\\\'s a direct David Gaider quote, the Lead Writer. Caps emphasis mine.
I could interpret that the Dragon Age series is all about cheese because the wonderfulness of cheese as it has been mentioned in both games. I\\\'d be wrong but I\\\'m perfectly free to make the interpretation.
Bottom line is they do not have situational sexuality. Isabela is undeniably bi, Karl was still Anders first even if he romances a F!Hawke even if it\\\'s not mentioned (again word of Gaider), Merrill will gladly make positive remarks about a female Hawke who doesn\\\'t romance her and even Fenris has some vaguely flirty lines for an unflirted, unromanced male hawke and he\\\'ll still end up sleeping with Isabela if neither is romanced by the PC. Everyone is bi sorry. At best the argument could be made for SingleTargetSexuality for Fenris and maybe Merrill.
I could interpret that the Dragon Age series is all about cheese because the wonderfulness of cheese as it has been mentioned in both games. I\\\'d be wrong but I\\\'m perfectly free to make the interpretation.
Bottom line is they do not have situational sexuality. Isabela is undeniably bi, Karl was still Anders first even if he romances a F!Hawke even if it\\\'s not mentioned (again word of Gaider), Merrill will gladly make positive remarks about a female Hawke who doesn\\\'t romance her and even Fenris has some vaguely flirty lines for an unflirted, unromanced male hawke and he\\\'ll still end up sleeping with Isabela if neither is romanced by the PC. Everyone is bi sorry. At best the argument could be made for SingleTargetSexuality for Fenris and maybe Merrill.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Not it\'s not situational sexuality. As taken from that thread, and in my YMMV discussion post. \
to:
Not it\\\'s not situational sexuality. As taken from that thread, and in my YMMV discussion post. \\\"My point is that their actions don\\\'t change, yet some people are deciding that their inference is enough to suggest the characters alter their preferences at the player\\\'s whim. Even IF they did, I\\\'m not sure that would be a crime. Regardless, IT\\\'S NOT THE CASE.\\\" That\\\'s the relevant sentences. They don\\\'t change regardless of someone interpretation. \\\" That\\\'s a direct David Gaider quote, the Lead Writer. Caps emphasis mine.
I could interpret that the Dragon Age series is all about cheese because the wonderfulness of cheese as it has been mentioned in both games. I\\\'d be wrong but I\\\'m perfectly free to make the interpretation.
Bottom line is they do not have situational sexuality. Isabela is undeniably bi, Karl was still Anders first even if he romances a F!Hawke even if it\\\'s not mentioned (again word of Gaider), Merrill will gladly make positive remarks about a female Hawke who doesn\\\'t romance her and even Fenris has some vaguely flirty lines for an unflirted, unromanced male hawke and he\\\'ll still end up sleeping with Isabela if neither is romanced by the PC. Everyone is bi sorry. At best the argument could be made for SingleTargetSexuality for Fenris and maybe Merrill.
I could interpret that the Dragon Age series is all about cheese because the wonderfulness of cheese as it has been mentioned in both games. I\\\'d be wrong but I\\\'m perfectly free to make the interpretation.
Bottom line is they do not have situational sexuality. Isabela is undeniably bi, Karl was still Anders first even if he romances a F!Hawke even if it\\\'s not mentioned (again word of Gaider), Merrill will gladly make positive remarks about a female Hawke who doesn\\\'t romance her and even Fenris has some vaguely flirty lines for an unflirted, unromanced male hawke and he\\\'ll still end up sleeping with Isabela if neither is romanced by the PC. Everyone is bi sorry. At best the argument could be made for SingleTargetSexuality for Fenris and maybe Merrill.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Not it\'s not situational sexuality. As taken from that thread, and in my YMMV discussion post. \
to:
Not it\\\'s not situational sexuality. As taken from that thread, and in my YMMV discussion post. \\\"My point is that their actions don\\\'t change, yet some people are deciding that their inference is enough to suggest the characters alter their preferences at the player\\\'s whim. Even IF they did, I\\\'m not sure that would be a crime. Regardless, IT\\\'S NOT THE CASE.\\\" That\\\'s the relevant sentences. They don\\\'t change regardless of someone interpretation. \\\" That\\\'s a direct David Gaider quote, the Lead Writer. Caps emphasis mine.
I could interpret that the Dragon Age series is all about cheese because the wonderfulness of cheese as it has been mentioned in both games. I\\\'d be wrong but I\\\'m perfectly free to make the interpetation.
Bottom line is they do not have situational sexuality. Isabela is undeniably bi, Karl was still Anders first even if he romances a F!Hawke even if it\\\'s not mentioned (again word of Gaider), Merrill will gladly make positive remarks about a female Hawke who doesn\\\'t romance her and even Fenris has some vaguely flirty lines for an unflirted, unromanced male hawke and he\\\'ll still end up sleeping with Isabela if neither is romanced by the PC. Everyone is bi sorry. At best the argument could be made for SingleTargetSexuality for Fenris and maybe Merrill.
I could interpret that the Dragon Age series is all about cheese because the wonderfulness of cheese as it has been mentioned in both games. I\\\'d be wrong but I\\\'m perfectly free to make the interpetation.
Bottom line is they do not have situational sexuality. Isabela is undeniably bi, Karl was still Anders first even if he romances a F!Hawke even if it\\\'s not mentioned (again word of Gaider), Merrill will gladly make positive remarks about a female Hawke who doesn\\\'t romance her and even Fenris has some vaguely flirty lines for an unflirted, unromanced male hawke and he\\\'ll still end up sleeping with Isabela if neither is romanced by the PC. Everyone is bi sorry. At best the argument could be made for SingleTargetSexuality for Fenris and maybe Merrill.
