Discussion History Literature / TheBible

Also, I suspect, as hinted above, that it would have ended up locked even if the UnknownTroper and I \\\'\\\'hadn\\\'t\\\'\\\' gone up in flames. TheBible is a hell of a lot more controversial even than the rest of the stuff on the LockedPages list.

Also in summary because this post isn\\\'t long enough yet, the reason I pouring the bile on is becuase \\\'\\\'I didn\\\'t realize it was bile at the time\\\'\\\', just like the UnknownTroper didn\\\'t realize that the piles he deleted were valid examples.

As for ItJustBugsMe, we \\\'\\\'might\\\'\\\' have, I\\\'m pretty sure there was a purge of that one a while back.

Also, I suspect, as hinted above, that it would have ended up locked even if the UnknownTroper and I \\\'\\\'hadn\\\'t\\\'\\\' gone up in flames. TheBible is a hell of a lot more controversial even than the rest of the stuff on the LockedPages list.

I had actually suggested that I be personally banned from the page instead of a general lock, I think, or at least meant to, but also was a mite concerned that I wasn\\\'t alone in being too passionate about it for safety- I only approached it in the first place, f\\\'rinstance, because the other guy purged half the entries, and he didn\\\'t have a handle I could touch. For comparison, I also think its flamebait to have trope details and wild mass guessing on the pages for current politicians (there was discussion on the Obama and Bush pages a while back, and I was of the opinion that we should purge), so its not just the bible that I think we should as a whole \\\'\\\'drop\\\'\\\' when the inevitable conflict arises- I wasn\\\'t aiming for it, but when the problem manifested on its own, I at least partially supported lock as a solution to the problem[[hottip:*: think IronMan in the CivilWar storyline- I don\\\'t trust others to self-regulate because I can\\\'t trust myself, making me less optimistic, perhaps wrongfully so, about the ability of others to do so]], although I was \\\'\\\'never\\\'\\\' going for that in my additions to the page. I only thought it was a good idea after the week-long cooling off period failed critically, too.

I had actually suggested that I be personally banned from the page instead of a general lock, I think, or at least meant to, but also was a mite concerned that I wasn\\\'t alone in being too passionate about it for safety- I only approached it in the first place, f\\\'rinstance, because the other guy purged half the entries, and he didn\\\'t have a handle I could touch. For comparison, I also think its flamebait to have trope details and wild mass guessing on the pages for current politicians (there was discussion on the Obama and Bush pages a while back, and I was of the opinion that we should purge), so its not just the bible that I think we should as a whole \\\'\\\'drop\\\'\\\' when the inevitable conflict arises- I wasn\\\'t aiming for it, but when the problem manifested on its own, I at least partially supported lock as a solution to the problem[hottip:*: think IronMan in the CivilWar storyline- I don\\\'t trust others to self-regulate because I can\\\'t trust myself]], although I was \\\'\\\'never\\\'\\\' going for that in my additions to the page.

I\\\'d be fine with it being reopened as long as I and the other IP address are personally locked from the page, it isn\\\'t treated like a bible seminar, and, ideally, that the fact that controvery exists can be mentioned, although the fact that I am preferential to that last one probably shows why I personally shouldn\\\'t be let on this page.