[001]
RobinZimm
Current Version
Changed line(s) 6 from:
n
The problem with this point in the current page is that the page asserts that atheism constitutes the \'\'absence\'\' of \'\'one\'\' belief -- \'\'not\'\' an entire belief system. There \'\'are\'\' atheist religions -- the page mentions these -- and there are evangelical, affirmative, positive atheists in the Western Enlightenment tradition -- the page mentions these as well -- but there is no canon of belief which constitutes such a label. The Daniel Smartt article linked does not change these facts.
to:
The problem with this point in the current page is that the page asserts that atheism constitutes the \\\'\\\'absence\\\'\\\' of \\\'\\\'one\\\'\\\' belief -- \\\'\\\'not\\\'\\\' an entire belief system. There \\\'\\\'are\\\'\\\' atheist religions -- the page mentions these -- and there are evangelical, affirmative, positive atheists in the Western Enlightenment tradition -- the page mentions these as well -- but there is no canon of belief which constitutes such a label. The Daniel Smartt article linked does not change these facts.
An enlargement on secular humanism would be appropriate, of course. But let\\\'s not confuse labels.
An enlargement on secular humanism would be appropriate, of course. But let\\\'s not confuse labels.
