[003]
Salmon
Current Version
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
I would say his own post proves the point. His so-called invasion turns out to be a handful of people who went over to the site in question and disputed the points being made. By his own admission, Krisnack is completely misrepresenting what happened and is thus being deliberately dishonest. He also claims his post was a \
to:
I would say his own post proves the point. His so-called invasion turns out to be a handful of people who went over to the site in question and disputed the points being made. By his own admission, Krisnack is completely misrepresenting what happened and is thus being deliberately dishonest. He also claims his post was a \\\"simple mistake\\\" yet he had put it in once before and it had been deleted then for the same reasons as are quoted now. By the way, the author of the site in question claims - repeat claims - to be a former Marine. The web is full of anonymous people making that claim. Just for the record, I took no part in the so-called invasion; my interest here is purely in preserving the integrity of this site.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
I would say his own post proves the point. His so-called invasion turns out to be a handful of people who went over to the site in question and disputed the points being made. By his own admission, Krisnack is completely misrepresenting what happened and is thus being deliberately dishonest. By the way, the author of the site in question claims - repeat claims - to be a former Marine. The web is full of anonymous people making that claim. Just for the record, I took no part in the so-called invasion; my interest here is purely in preserving the integrity of this site.
to:
I would say his own post proves the point. His so-called invasion turns out to be a handful of people who went over to the site in question and disputed the points being made. By his own admission, Krisnack is completely misrepresenting what happened and is thus being deliberately dishonest. He also claims his post was a \\\"mistake\\\" yet he had put it in once before and it had been deleted then for the same reasons as are quoted now. By the way, the author of the site in question claims - repeat claims - to be a former Marine. The web is full of anonymous people making that claim. Just for the record, I took no part in the so-called invasion; my interest here is purely in preserving the integrity of this site.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
I would say his own post proves the point. His so-called invasion turns out to be a handful of people who went over to the site in question and disputed the points being made. By his own admission, Krisnack is completely misrepresenting what happened and is thus being deliberately dishonest. By the way, the author of the site in question claims - repeat claims - to be a former Marine. The web is full of anonymous people making that claim. By the way, I took no part in the so-called invasion; my interest here is purely in preserving the integrity of this site.
to:
I would say his own post proves the point. His so-called invasion turns out to be a handful of people who went over to the site in question and disputed the points being made. By his own admission, Krisnack is completely misrepresenting what happened and is thus being deliberately dishonest. By the way, the author of the site in question claims - repeat claims - to be a former Marine. The web is full of anonymous people making that claim. Just for the record, I took no part in the so-called invasion; my interest here is purely in preserving the integrity of this site.
