[003]
JBK405
Current Version
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
Maggie, even if they never put in even the small hints they did, was always written as a gay character, and they \'\'did\'\' put in a few vague indicators to lead the way. Tropes are created by the writers of the show, by what does or doesn\'t happen, not by what viewers take away from the show. The subversion explanation does refer to the viewers expectations tricking themselves, but that is because the writers themselves are performing an action. Even if \'\'we\'\' don\'t get it, it was still done (See also DeathOfTheAuthor, FanDumb, MisaimedFandom, and TropesAreTools, these are articles that cover the importance of author intention, what readers get out of their story, the importance of tropes themselves, etc. And no, I in no way mean to say that you are falling under the heading of FanDumb or MisaimedFandom, your arguments are quite logical even if I don\'t agree with them, but those article cover a lot of what I\'m referring to)
to:
Maggie, even if they never put in even the small hints they did, was always written as a gay character, and they \\\'\\\'did\\\'\\\' put in a few vague indicators to lead the way. Tropes are created by the writers of the show, by what does or doesn\\\'t happen, not by what viewers take away from the show. The subversion explanation does refer to the viewers expectations tricking themselves, but that is because the writers themselves are performing an action. Even if \\\'\\\'we\\\'\\\' don\\\'t get it, it was still done.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
Maggie, even if they never put in even the small hints they did, was always written as a gay character, and they \'\'did\'\' put in a few vague indicators to lead the way. Tropes are created by the writers of the show, by what does or doesn\'t happen, not by what viewers take away from the show. The subversion explanation does refer to the viewers expectations tricking themselves, but that is because the writers themselves are performing an action. Even if \'\'we\'\' don\'t get it, it was still done (See also DeathOfTheAuthor, FanDumb, MisaimdFandom, and TropesAreTools, these are articles that cover the importance of author intention, what readers get out of their story, the importance of tropes themselves, etc. And no, I in no way mean to say that you are falling under the heading of FanDumb or MisaimedFandom, your arguments are quite logical even if I don\'t agree with them, but those article cover a lot of what I\'m referring to)
to:
Maggie, even if they never put in even the small hints they did, was always written as a gay character, and they \\\'\\\'did\\\'\\\' put in a few vague indicators to lead the way. Tropes are created by the writers of the show, by what does or doesn\\\'t happen, not by what viewers take away from the show. The subversion explanation does refer to the viewers expectations tricking themselves, but that is because the writers themselves are performing an action. Even if \\\'\\\'we\\\'\\\' don\\\'t get it, it was still done (See also DeathOfTheAuthor, FanDumb, MisaimedFandom, and TropesAreTools, these are articles that cover the importance of author intention, what readers get out of their story, the importance of tropes themselves, etc. And no, I in no way mean to say that you are falling under the heading of FanDumb or MisaimedFandom, your arguments are quite logical even if I don\\\'t agree with them, but those article cover a lot of what I\\\'m referring to)
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
Maggie, even if they never put in even the small hints they did, was always written as a gay character, and they \'\'did\'\' put in a few vague indicators to lead the way.
to:
Maggie, even if they never put in even the small hints they did, was always written as a gay character, and they \\\'\\\'did\\\'\\\' put in a few vague indicators to lead the way. Tropes are created by the writers of the show, by what does or doesn\\\'t happen, not by what viewers take away from the show. The subversion explanation does refer to the viewers expectations tricking themselves, but that is because the writers themselves are performing an action. Even if \\\'\\\'we\\\'\\\' don\\\'t get it, it was still done (See also DeathOfTheAuthor, FanDumb, MisaimdFandom, and TropesAreTools, these are articles that cover the importance of author intention, what readers get out of their story, the importance of tropes themselves, etc. And no, I in no way mean to say that you are falling under the heading of FanDumb or MisaimedFandom, your arguments are quite logical even if I don\\\'t agree with them, but those article cover a lot of what I\\\'m referring to)
