[002]
HyperCubed4
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Is there an opposite to Superpowered Evil Side? A SES seems to be provoked by revenge/anger, but what about one inspired by justice or something equivalent?
to:
Is there an opposite to Superpowered Evil Side? Like something being fueled by justice, rather than fueled by anger/revenge.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
McLennnan and Sartin (MLS for typing convenience hereout) don\'t have their own page. And most reviews are just reviews, but the MLS review is generally a vital part of the \
to:
McLennnan and Sartin (MLS for typing convenience hereout) don\\\'t have their own page. And most reviews are just reviews, but the MLS review is generally a vital part of the \\\"FATAL experience\\\". And for that reason, that particular review should be an exception to that particular rule in this particular circumstance.
This isn\\\'t wikipedia, rules don\\\'t need to and shouldn\\\'t be used as a bludgeon.
Also.
*removed due to being an unnecessary expansion when the point has already been made
--> just plain disagree, why is the expansion unnecessary and what site rules exist forbidding elaboration?
*Complaining About Shows, Completely Missing the Point, Critical Research Failure
--> So because the review called them out they can\\\'t be included? That makes no sense. \\\'\\\'Especially\\\'\\\' in the case of critical research failure. Hall was called out on it in the review, but it\\\'s still in the actual game. The first two I won\\\'t readd because they don\\\'t really add anything, but critical research failure ought to stay.
EDIT - apparently I got the contents of Critical Research Failure mixed up with the stuff in YouFailBiologyForever while typing the above. It can go.
*CrossesTheLineTwice
-->Fine, away it goes.
*SmallNameBigEgo
-->There probably ought to be some sort of discussion on how to use this trope. The article itself got locked down ages ago and all work on the cleanup version has stalled out. But Byron Hall doesn\\\'t and never will have a page about himself (can you imagine the nightmare that one would be to maintain?), and his responses are one of the most glaring examples of the symptom I\\\'ve ever heard of. This \\\'\\\'really\\\'\\\' ought to be allowed to stay, even if it needs a disclaimer added to the end like \\\"This does not need expanding. Please.\\\"
*SchmuckBait
-->Away it goes.
This isn\\\'t wikipedia, rules don\\\'t need to and shouldn\\\'t be used as a bludgeon.
Also.
*removed due to being an unnecessary expansion when the point has already been made
--> just plain disagree, why is the expansion unnecessary and what site rules exist forbidding elaboration?
*Complaining About Shows, Completely Missing the Point, Critical Research Failure
--> So because the review called them out they can\\\'t be included? That makes no sense. \\\'\\\'Especially\\\'\\\' in the case of critical research failure. Hall was called out on it in the review, but it\\\'s still in the actual game. The first two I won\\\'t readd because they don\\\'t really add anything, but critical research failure ought to stay.
EDIT - apparently I got the contents of Critical Research Failure mixed up with the stuff in YouFailBiologyForever while typing the above. It can go.
*CrossesTheLineTwice
-->Fine, away it goes.
*SmallNameBigEgo
-->There probably ought to be some sort of discussion on how to use this trope. The article itself got locked down ages ago and all work on the cleanup version has stalled out. But Byron Hall doesn\\\'t and never will have a page about himself (can you imagine the nightmare that one would be to maintain?), and his responses are one of the most glaring examples of the symptom I\\\'ve ever heard of. This \\\'\\\'really\\\'\\\' ought to be allowed to stay, even if it needs a disclaimer added to the end like \\\"This does not need expanding. Please.\\\"
*SchmuckBait
-->Away it goes.
