[008]
rodneyAnonymous
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
\'\'\
to:
\\\'\\\'\\\"You can look up \\\"stirring\\\", \\\"uplifting\\\" and \\\"majestic\\\" in the dictionary. You shouldn\\\'t have to just rely on me to tell you.\\\"\\\'\\\'
Articles should be clear without readers having to consult another reference. Editors maybe should, though: consulting a thesaurus, you might find that, while those words are not synonymous, they share many synonyms (similar by ~1 degree of separation). It is not crazy to suggest that the two similar criteria should be better-differentiated / better-defined, nor is \\\"nuh-uh, it\\\'s not unclear to me\\\" a valid argument against such a suggestion.
\\\'\\\'\\\"I can\\\'t properly explain the difference, which is why \\\"it is hard to quantify\\\" is in the description.\\\"\\\'\\\'
Yes. I think that is bad. \\\"Definition: it\\\'s hard to define...\\\" is a very poor definition.
PS: \\\"\\\'\\\'You shouldn\\\'t have to just rely on me to tell you.\\\"\\\'\\\'... condescending, again...
Articles should be clear without readers having to consult another reference. Editors maybe should, though: consulting a thesaurus, you might find that, while those words are not synonymous, they share many synonyms (similar by ~1 degree of separation). It is not crazy to suggest that the two similar criteria should be better-differentiated / better-defined, nor is \\\"nuh-uh, it\\\'s not unclear to me\\\" a valid argument against such a suggestion.
\\\'\\\'\\\"I can\\\'t properly explain the difference, which is why \\\"it is hard to quantify\\\" is in the description.\\\"\\\'\\\'
Yes. I think that is bad. \\\"Definition: it\\\'s hard to define...\\\" is a very poor definition.
PS: \\\"\\\'\\\'You shouldn\\\'t have to just rely on me to tell you.\\\"\\\'\\\'... condescending, again...
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
\'\'\
to:
\\\'\\\'\\\"You can look up \\\"stirring\\\", \\\"uplifting\\\" and \\\"majestic\\\" in the dictionary. You shouldn\\\'t have to just rely on me to tell you.\\\"\\\'\\\'
Articles should be clear without readers having to consult another reference. Editors maybe should, though: consulting a thesaurus, you might find that, while those words are not synonymous, they share many synonyms (similar by ~1 degree of separation). It is not crazy to suggest that the two similar criteria should be better-differentiated / better-defined, nor is \\\"nuh-uh, it\\\'s not unclear to me\\\" a valid argument against such a suggestion.
\\\'\\\'\\\"I can\\\'t properly explain the difference, which is why \\\"it is hard to quantify\\\" is in the description.\\\"\\\'\\\'
Yes. I think that is bad. \\\"Definition: it\\\'s hard to define...\\\" is a very poor definition.
PS: \\\"\\\'\\\'You shouldn\\\'t have to just rely on me to tell you.\\\"\\\'\\\'... condescending, again...
Articles should be clear without readers having to consult another reference. Editors maybe should, though: consulting a thesaurus, you might find that, while those words are not synonymous, they share many synonyms (similar by ~1 degree of separation). It is not crazy to suggest that the two similar criteria should be better-differentiated / better-defined, nor is \\\"nuh-uh, it\\\'s not unclear to me\\\" a valid argument against such a suggestion.
\\\'\\\'\\\"I can\\\'t properly explain the difference, which is why \\\"it is hard to quantify\\\" is in the description.\\\"\\\'\\\'
Yes. I think that is bad. \\\"Definition: it\\\'s hard to define...\\\" is a very poor definition.
PS: \\\"\\\'\\\'You shouldn\\\'t have to just rely on me to tell you.\\\"\\\'\\\'... condescending, again...
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
\'\'\
to:
\\\'\\\'\\\"You can look up \\\"stirring\\\", \\\"uplifting\\\" and \\\"majestic\\\" in the dictionary. You shouldn\\\'t have to just rely on me to tell you.\\\"\\\'\\\'
Articles should be clear without readers having to consult another reference. Editors maybe should, though: consulting a thesaurus, you might find that, while those words are not synonymous, they share many synonyms (similar by ~1 degree of separation). It is not crazy to suggest that the two similar criteria should be better-differentiated / better-defined, nor is \\\"nuh-uh, it\\\'s not unclear to me\\\" a valid argument against such a suggestion.
PS: condescending, again...
Articles should be clear without readers having to consult another reference. Editors maybe should, though: consulting a thesaurus, you might find that, while those words are not synonymous, they share many synonyms (similar by ~1 degree of separation). It is not crazy to suggest that the two similar criteria should be better-differentiated / better-defined, nor is \\\"nuh-uh, it\\\'s not unclear to me\\\" a valid argument against such a suggestion.
PS: condescending, again...
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
\'\'\
to:
\\\'\\\'\\\"You can look up \\\"stirring\\\", \\\"uplifting\\\" and \\\"majestic\\\" in the dictionary. You shouldn\\\'t have to just rely on me to tell you.\\\"\\\'\\\'
Articles should be clear without readers having to consult another reference. Editors maybe should, though: consulting a thesaurus, you might find that, while those words are not synonymous, they share many synonyms (similar by ~1 degree of separation). It is not crazy to suggest that the two similar criteria should be better-differentiated / better-defined, nor is \\\"nuh-uh, it\\\'s not unclear to me\\\" a valid argument against such a suggestion.
Articles should be clear without readers having to consult another reference. Editors maybe should, though: consulting a thesaurus, you might find that, while those words are not synonymous, they share many synonyms (similar by ~1 degree of separation). It is not crazy to suggest that the two similar criteria should be better-differentiated / better-defined, nor is \\\"nuh-uh, it\\\'s not unclear to me\\\" a valid argument against such a suggestion.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
\'\'\
to:
\\\'\\\'\\\"You can look up \\\"stirring\\\", \\\"uplifting\\\" and \\\"majestic\\\" in the dictionary. You shouldn\\\'t have to just rely on me to tell you.\\\"\\\'\\\'
Articles should be clear without readers having to consult another reference. Editors maybe should, though: consulting a thesaurus, you might find that, while those words are not synonymous, they share many synonyms (similar by ~1 degree of separation). It is not crazy to suggest that they should be further differentiated / defined, nor is \\\"nuh-uh, it\\\'s not unclear to me\\\" a valid argument against such a suggestion.
Articles should be clear without readers having to consult another reference. Editors maybe should, though: consulting a thesaurus, you might find that, while those words are not synonymous, they share many synonyms (similar by ~1 degree of separation). It is not crazy to suggest that they should be further differentiated / defined, nor is \\\"nuh-uh, it\\\'s not unclear to me\\\" a valid argument against such a suggestion.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
\'\'\
to:
\\\'\\\'\\\"You can look up \\\"stirring\\\", \\\"uplifting\\\" and \\\"majestic\\\" in the dictionary. You shouldn\\\'t have to just rely on me to tell you.\\\"\\\'\\\'
Articles should be clear without readers having to consult another reference. Editors, maybe, though: consulting a thesaurus, you might find that, while those words are not synonymous, they share many synonyms (similar by ~1 degree of separation). It is not crazy to suggest that they should be further differentiated / defined, nor is \\\"nuh-uh, it\\\'s not unclear to me\\\" a valid argument against such a suggestion.
Articles should be clear without readers having to consult another reference. Editors, maybe, though: consulting a thesaurus, you might find that, while those words are not synonymous, they share many synonyms (similar by ~1 degree of separation). It is not crazy to suggest that they should be further differentiated / defined, nor is \\\"nuh-uh, it\\\'s not unclear to me\\\" a valid argument against such a suggestion.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
\'\'\
to:
\\\'\\\'\\\"You can look up \\\"stirring\\\", \\\"uplifting\\\" and \\\"majestic\\\" in the dictionary. You shouldn\\\'t have to just rely on me to tell you.\\\"\\\'\\\'
Articles should be clear without readers having to consult another reference. You might find that, while the words are not synonymous, they share many synonyms (similar by ~1 degree of separation). It is not crazy to suggest that they should be further differentiated / defined, nor is \\\"nuh-uh, it\\\'s not unclear to me\\\" a valid argument against such a suggestion.
Articles should be clear without readers having to consult another reference. You might find that, while the words are not synonymous, they share many synonyms (similar by ~1 degree of separation). It is not crazy to suggest that they should be further differentiated / defined, nor is \\\"nuh-uh, it\\\'s not unclear to me\\\" a valid argument against such a suggestion.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
\
to:
\\\'\\\'\\\"You can look up \\\"stirring\\\", \\\"uplifting\\\" and \\\"majestic\\\" in the dictionary. You shouldn\\\'t have to just rely on me to tell you.\\\"\\\'\\\'
Articles should be clear without readers having to consult another reference.
Articles should be clear without readers having to consult another reference.
