[002]
Drolyt
Current Version
Changed line(s) 2 from:
n
@RobinZimm No, no I am not. I am claiming 2 things only: 1. the tone of that passage is confrontational and offensive to theists (removing the \
to:
@RobinZimm No, no I am not. I am claiming 2 things only: 1. the tone of that passage is confrontational and offensive to theists (removing the \\\"obscenely\\\" would certainly help with that) and 2. religion cannot be proven or disproven by science. If anyone took anything else from my arguments, that means only that I am bad at debate.
Edit: Also, unless I am missing something big, that link doesn\\\'t really present an argument for religion being disprovable, it just kind of states it in a matter of fact way.
Edit: Also, unless I am missing something big, that link doesn\\\'t really present an argument for religion being disprovable, it just kind of states it in a matter of fact way.
Changed line(s) 2 from:
n
@RobinZimm No, no I am not. I am claiming 2 things only: 1. the tone of that passage is confrontational and offensive to theists (removing the \
to:
@RobinZimm No, no I am not. I am claiming 2 things only: 1. the tone of that passage is confrontational and offensive to theists (removing the \\\"obscenely\\\" would certainly help with that) and 2. religion cannot be proven or disproven by science. If anyone took anything else from my arguments, that means only that I am bad at debate.
