Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion History Recap / HouseOfTheDragonS1E9TheGreenCouncil

Go To

[007] Eievie Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
The Laconic page mentions BDSM only, but the [[PlayingWith/BondageIsBad Playing With]] page mentions fetishism too? So I dunno, I do think there\'s room to argue it either ways, and I think this might be a job for the Administrativa/TropeRepairShop to clarify but it\'s always so busy that\'s probably not gonna happen.
to:
The [[Laconic/BondageIsBad Laconic]] page mentions BDSM only, but the [[PlayingWith/BondageIsBad Playing With]] page mentions fetishism too? So I dunno, I do think there\\\'s room to argue it either way. Ideally this would be a job for Administrivia/TropeRepairShop to clarify but it\\\'s always so busy that\\\'s probably not gonna happen.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
If I was giving personal opinion, though, I \'\'would\'\' think we\'re talking about here but two separate tropes here, albeit SisterTrope. If someone can maintain an erection while beating their lover, there\'s a violent, dangerous air to that. With a foot fetish, the symbolism is very different; weird, gross, mystifying, but not \'\'dangerous\'\' per se. There is no \
to:
If I was giving personal opinion, though, I \\\'\\\'would\\\'\\\' think we\\\'re talking about here but two separate tropes here, albeit SisterTrope. If someone can maintain an erection while beating their lover, there\\\'s a violent, dangerous air to that. With a foot fetish, the symbolism is very different; weird, gross, mystifying, but not \\\'\\\'dangerous\\\'\\\' per se. There is no \\\"foot fetish sex gone wrong and now someone is dead\\\".
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
If I was giving personal opinion, though, I \'\'would\'\' think we\'re talking about here but two separate tropes here, albeit SisterTrope. If someone can maintain an erection while beating their lover, there\'s a violent, dangerous air to that. With a foot fetish, the symbolism is very different; weird, gross, mystifying, but not \'\'dangerous\'\' per se. There is no \
to:
If I was giving personal opinion, though, I \\\'\\\'would\\\'\\\' think we\\\'re talking about here but two separate tropes here, albeit SisterTrope. If someone can maintain an erection while beating their lover, there\\\'s a violent, dangerous air to that. With a foot fetish, the symbolism is very different; weird, gross, mystifying, but not \\\'\\\'dangerous\\\'\\\' per se. There is no \\\"foot fetish sex gone wrong and now someone is dead\\\".
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
If I was giving personal opinion, though, I \'\'would\'\' think we\'re talking about here but two separate tropes here, albeit SisterTrope. If someone can maintain an erection while beating their lover, there\'s a violet, dangerous air to that. With a foot fetish, the symbolism is very different; weird, gross, mystifying, but not \'\'dangerous\'\' per se. There is no \
to:
If I was giving personal opinion, though, I \\\'\\\'would\\\'\\\' think we\\\'re talking about here but two separate tropes here, albeit SisterTrope. If someone can maintain an erection while beating their lover, there\\\'s a violent, dangerous air to that. With a foot fetish, the symbolism is very different; weird, gross, mystifying, but not \\\'\\\'dangerous\\\'\\\' per se. There is no \\\"foot fetish sex gone wrong and now some is dead\\\".
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
If I was giving personal opinion, though, I \'\'would\'\' think we\'re talking about here but two separate tropes here, albeit SisterTropes. If someone can maintain an erection while beating their lover, there\'s a violet, dangerous air to that. With a foot fetish, the symbolism is very different; weird, gross, mystifying, but not \'\'dangerous\'\' per se. There is no \
to:
If I was giving personal opinion, though, I \\\'\\\'would\\\'\\\' think we\\\'re talking about here but two separate tropes here, albeit SisterTrope. If someone can maintain an erection while beating their lover, there\\\'s a violet, dangerous air to that. With a foot fetish, the symbolism is very different; weird, gross, mystifying, but not \\\'\\\'dangerous\\\'\\\' per se. There is no \\\"foot fetish sex gone wrong and now some is dead\\\".
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
The Laconic page mentions BDSM only, but the [[PlayingWith/BondageIsBad Playing With]] page mentions fetishism too? So I dunno, I do think there\'s room to argue it either ways, and I think this might be a job for the Main/TropeRepairShop to clarify but it\'s always so busy that\'s probably not gonna happen.
to:
The Laconic page mentions BDSM only, but the [[PlayingWith/BondageIsBad Playing With]] page mentions fetishism too? So I dunno, I do think there\\\'s room to argue it either ways, and I think this might be a job for the Administrativa/TropeRepairShop to clarify but it\\\'s always so busy that\\\'s probably not gonna happen.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
If I was giving personal opinion, though, I \'\'would\'\' think we\'re talking about here but two separate tropes here, albeit SisterTropes. If someone can maintain an erection while beating their lover, there\'s a violet, dangerous air to that. With a foot fetish, the symbolism is very different; weird, gross, mystifying, but not \'\'dangerous\'\' per se.
to:
If I was giving personal opinion, though, I \\\'\\\'would\\\'\\\' think we\\\'re talking about here but two separate tropes here, albeit SisterTropes. If someone can maintain an erection while beating their lover, there\\\'s a violet, dangerous air to that. With a foot fetish, the symbolism is very different; weird, gross, mystifying, but not \\\'\\\'dangerous\\\'\\\' per se. There is no \\\"foot fetish sex gone wrong and now some is dead\\\".
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
The Laconic page mentions BDSM only, but the [[PlayingWith/BondageIsBad Playing With]] page mentions fetishism too? So I dunno, I do think there\'s room to argue it either ways, and I think this might be a job for the TropeRepairShop to clarify but it\'s always so busy that\'s probably not gonna happen.
to:
The Laconic page mentions BDSM only, but the [[PlayingWith/BondageIsBad Playing With]] page mentions fetishism too? So I dunno, I do think there\\\'s room to argue it either ways, and I think this might be a job for the Main/TropeRepairShop to clarify but it\\\'s always so busy that\\\'s probably not gonna happen.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
If I was giving personal opinion, though, I \'\'would\'\' think we\'re talking about here but two separate tropes here, albeit SisterTropes. If someone can maintain an erection while beating their lover, there\'s a violet, dangerous air to that. With a foot fetish, the symbolism is very different; mostly that it\'s \'\'weird\'\' or mystifying, but not \'\'dangerous\'\' per se.
to:
If I was giving personal opinion, though, I \\\'\\\'would\\\'\\\' think we\\\'re talking about here but two separate tropes here, albeit SisterTropes. If someone can maintain an erection while beating their lover, there\\\'s a violet, dangerous air to that. With a foot fetish, the symbolism is very different; weird, gross, mystifying, but not \\\'\\\'dangerous\\\'\\\' per se.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
The Laconic page mentions BDSM only, but the {{Playing With|/BondageIsBad}} page mentions fetishism too? So I dunno, I do think there\'s room to argue it either ways, and I think this might be a job for the TropeRepairShop to clarify but it\'s always so busy that\'s probably not gonna happen.
to:
The Laconic page mentions BDSM only, but the [[PlayingWith/BondageIsBad Playing With]] page mentions fetishism too? So I dunno, I do think there\\\'s room to argue it either ways, and I think this might be a job for the TropeRepairShop to clarify but it\\\'s always so busy that\\\'s probably not gonna happen.

If I was giving personal opinion, though, I \\\'\\\'would\\\'\\\' think we\\\'re talking about here but two separate tropes here, albeit SisterTropes. If someone can maintain an erection while beating their lover, there\\\'s a violet, dangerous air to that. With a foot fetish, the symbolism is very different; mostly that it\\\'s \\\'\\\'weird\\\'\\\' or mystifying, but not \\\'\\\'dangerous\\\'\\\' per se.
Top