[004]
NubianSatyress
Current Version
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
The problem I have with your response is that you\'re using a chicken vs egg argument regarding Qrow\'s Semblance. Is it inconsistent in fanon, or is there a lot of fanon about it because it\'s inconsistent. The fact that your last sentence regarding it is: \
to:
The problem I have with your response is that you\\\'re using a chicken vs egg argument regarding Qrow\\\'s Semblance. Is it inconsistent in fanon, or is there a lot of fanon about it because it\\\'s inconsistent. The fact that your last sentence regarding it is: \\\"Fans can interpret it however they please\\\" confirms the latter. If fans are allowed to interpret something \\\"however they please\\\", then that flat out means there ARE no rules to keep consistent.
Regarding Aura, no...what you said is wrong. When Ruby is sparring with Oscar in S5 E4 (thanks to
Twiins iink for sourcing this so I could find it), she manages to hurt Oscar with a punch and Ozpin tells Oscar \\\"you forgot to activate your Aura again\\\". So again, we\\\'re left either assuming that Oscar is \\\'\\\'another\\\'\\\' \\\"exception\\\" to the rules (which is not stated) or that this is a rule that has gone unaddressed. Either way, it is another inconsistency.
\\\"The show has also indicated that Qrow\\\'s Semblance is unusual and does work a little differently to other Semblances.\\\"
When and where? You just said that fans can \\\"interpret it however they like\\\". If there are rules, then that isn\\\'t really the case.
Regarding Aura, no...what you said is wrong. When Ruby is sparring with Oscar in S5 E4 (thanks to
Twiins iink for sourcing this so I could find it), she manages to hurt Oscar with a punch and Ozpin tells Oscar \\\"you forgot to activate your Aura again\\\". So again, we\\\'re left either assuming that Oscar is \\\'\\\'another\\\'\\\' \\\"exception\\\" to the rules (which is not stated) or that this is a rule that has gone unaddressed. Either way, it is another inconsistency.
\\\"The show has also indicated that Qrow\\\'s Semblance is unusual and does work a little differently to other Semblances.\\\"
When and where? You just said that fans can \\\"interpret it however they like\\\". If there are rules, then that isn\\\'t really the case.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
The problem I have with your response is that you\'re using a chicken vs egg argument regarding Qrow\'s Semblance. Is it inconsistent in fanon, or is there a lot of fanon about it because it\'s inconsistent. The fact that your last sentence regarding it is: \
to:
The problem I have with your response is that you\\\'re using a chicken vs egg argument regarding Qrow\\\'s Semblance. Is it inconsistent in fanon, or is there a lot of fanon about it because it\\\'s inconsistent. The fact that your last sentence regarding it is: \\\"Fans can interpret it however they please\\\" confirms the latter. If fans are allowed to interpret something \\\"however they please\\\", then that flat out means there ARE no rules to keep consistent.
Regarding Aura, no...what you said is wrong. When Ruby is sparring with Oscar in S5 E4 (thanks to
Twiins iink for sourcing this so I could find it), she manages to hurt Oscar with a punch and Ozpin tells Oscar \\\"you forgot to activate your Aura again\\\". So again, we\\\'re left either assuming that Oscar is \\\'\\\'another\\\'\\\' \\\"exception\\\" to the rules (which is not stated) or that this is a rule that has gone unaddressed. Either way, it is another inconsistency.
\\\"The show has also indicated that Qrow\\\'s Semblance is unusual and does work a little differently to other Semblances.\\\"
When and where? You just said that fans can \\\"interpret it however they like\\\". If there are rules, then
Regarding Aura, no...what you said is wrong. When Ruby is sparring with Oscar in S5 E4 (thanks to
Twiins iink for sourcing this so I could find it), she manages to hurt Oscar with a punch and Ozpin tells Oscar \\\"you forgot to activate your Aura again\\\". So again, we\\\'re left either assuming that Oscar is \\\'\\\'another\\\'\\\' \\\"exception\\\" to the rules (which is not stated) or that this is a rule that has gone unaddressed. Either way, it is another inconsistency.
\\\"The show has also indicated that Qrow\\\'s Semblance is unusual and does work a little differently to other Semblances.\\\"
When and where? You just said that fans can \\\"interpret it however they like\\\". If there are rules, then
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
The problem I have with your response is that you\'re using a chicken vs egg argument regarding Qrow\'s Semblance. Is it inconsistent in fanon, or is there a lot of fanon about it because it\'s inconsistent. The fact that your last sentence regarding it is: \
to:
The problem I have with your response is that you\\\'re using a chicken vs egg argument regarding Qrow\\\'s Semblance. Is it inconsistent in fanon, or is there a lot of fanon about it because it\\\'s inconsistent. The fact that your last sentence regarding it is: \\\"Fans can interpret it however they please\\\" confirms the latter. If fans are allowed to interpret something \\\"however they please\\\", then that flat out means there ARE no rules to keep consistent.
Regarding Aura, no...what you said is wrong. When Ruby is sparring with Oscar in S5 E4 (thanks to
Twiins iink for sourcing this so I could find it), she manages to hurt Oscar with a punch and Ozpin tells Oscar \\\"you forgot to activate your Aura again\\\". So again, we\\\'re left either assuming that Oscar is \\\'\\\'another\\\'\\\' \\\"exception\\\" to the rules (which is not stated) or that this is a rule that has gone unaddressed. Either way, it is another inconsistency.
\\\"The show has also indicated that Qrow\\\'s Semblance is unusual and does work a little differently to other Semblances.\\\"
When and where?
Regarding Aura, no...what you said is wrong. When Ruby is sparring with Oscar in S5 E4 (thanks to
Twiins iink for sourcing this so I could find it), she manages to hurt Oscar with a punch and Ozpin tells Oscar \\\"you forgot to activate your Aura again\\\". So again, we\\\'re left either assuming that Oscar is \\\'\\\'another\\\'\\\' \\\"exception\\\" to the rules (which is not stated) or that this is a rule that has gone unaddressed. Either way, it is another inconsistency.
\\\"The show has also indicated that Qrow\\\'s Semblance is unusual and does work a little differently to other Semblances.\\\"
When and where?
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
The problem I have with your response is that you\'re using a chicken vs egg argument regarding Qrow\'s Semblance. Is it inconsistent in fanon, or is there a lot of fanon about it because it\'s inconsistent. The fact that your last sentence regarding it is: \
to:
The problem I have with your response is that you\\\'re using a chicken vs egg argument regarding Qrow\\\'s Semblance. Is it inconsistent in fanon, or is there a lot of fanon about it because it\\\'s inconsistent. The fact that your last sentence regarding it is: \\\"Fans can interpret it however they please\\\" confirms the latter. If fans are allowed to interpret something \\\"however they please\\\", then that flat out means there ARE no rules to keep consistent.
Regarding Aura, no...what you said is wrong. When Ruby is sparring with Oscar in S5 E4 (thanks to
Twiins iink for sourcing this so I could find it), she manages to hurt Oscar with a punch and Ozpin tells Oscar \\\"you forgot to activate your Aura again\\\". So again, we\\\'re left either assuming that Oscar is \\\'\\\'another\\\'\\\' \\\"exception\\\" to the rules (which is not stated) or that this is a rule that has gone unaddressed. Either way, it is another inconsistency.
Regarding Aura, no...what you said is wrong. When Ruby is sparring with Oscar in S5 E4 (thanks to
Twiins iink for sourcing this so I could find it), she manages to hurt Oscar with a punch and Ozpin tells Oscar \\\"you forgot to activate your Aura again\\\". So again, we\\\'re left either assuming that Oscar is \\\'\\\'another\\\'\\\' \\\"exception\\\" to the rules (which is not stated) or that this is a rule that has gone unaddressed. Either way, it is another inconsistency.
