[003]
OmegaNemesis13
Current Version
Changed line(s) 6 from:
n
--- If you look at actual reviews and not just review scores, there are mostly negative reviews of the series that are not just about \
to:
--- If you look at actual reviews and not just review scores, there are mostly negative reviews of the series that are not just about \\\"nostalgia blinded babies\\\". The common points of those legit reviews are \\\"bad animation, bad art, unfunny humor, disrespectful attitude towards the original\\\". These are major sources of issues that definitely would qualify as horrible outside of the last one, which can be more subjective despite it being a recurring theme in the reviews.
2. The work has a small audience, and if it\\\'s produced for profit it has poor sales.
-- MEANING that it isn\\\'t disqualified just because it has fans. It can have fans and still qualify as this trope. And by any objective standpoint, clearly that fanbase was not strong enough to last them a season, as the series was cancelled after all.
3. The work has been panned by multiple critics for its low quality. The work\\\'s flaws may be parodied by a number of other works, and in some cases the work may even become a pop culture-level Snark Bait.
-- Again, see above point. It\\\'s not just about people who are just hating to be hated, there are legit reviews of the series out there. What seems to be more of a consistent issue isn\\\'t the hatedom, but a majority of journalists who hate the fans who hate the show and will not listen to what they have to say. Something I thoroughly expect here because of the wording of those fans. The fact that many spend more time talking about fans than the show itself is a concerning idea.
And I\\\'m gonna make it clear, I\\\'m not and have never been a fan of Thundercats of any incarnation, so I have no nostalgic feelings for it, but the facts are facts. This show was bad, didn\\\'t catch on with its target audience or older fans and has many aspects to it that are legitimately considered bad.
It is more than qualified for an entry on this trope. And if anything, the idea that \\\"it has fans, so it\\\'s not eligible\\\" needs to end because that\\\'s not what the rules say, as I just quoted. And in the future, let us be civil instead of resorting to the same buzzwords. Just pointing out that people use those buzzwords, then use similar buswords like asshurt or extreme hyperbole does not make you look any better.
2. The work has a small audience, and if it\\\'s produced for profit it has poor sales.
-- MEANING that it isn\\\'t disqualified just because it has fans. It can have fans and still qualify as this trope. And by any objective standpoint, clearly that fanbase was not strong enough to last them a season, as the series was cancelled after all.
3. The work has been panned by multiple critics for its low quality. The work\\\'s flaws may be parodied by a number of other works, and in some cases the work may even become a pop culture-level Snark Bait.
-- Again, see above point. It\\\'s not just about people who are just hating to be hated, there are legit reviews of the series out there. What seems to be more of a consistent issue isn\\\'t the hatedom, but a majority of journalists who hate the fans who hate the show and will not listen to what they have to say. Something I thoroughly expect here because of the wording of those fans. The fact that many spend more time talking about fans than the show itself is a concerning idea.
And I\\\'m gonna make it clear, I\\\'m not and have never been a fan of Thundercats of any incarnation, so I have no nostalgic feelings for it, but the facts are facts. This show was bad, didn\\\'t catch on with its target audience or older fans and has many aspects to it that are legitimately considered bad.
It is more than qualified for an entry on this trope. And if anything, the idea that \\\"it has fans, so it\\\'s not eligible\\\" needs to end because that\\\'s not what the rules say, as I just quoted. And in the future, let us be civil instead of resorting to the same buzzwords. Just pointing out that people use those buzzwords, then use similar buswords like asshurt or extreme hyperbole does not make you look any better.
Changed line(s) 6 from:
n
--- If you look at actual reviews and not just review scores, there are mostly negative reviews of the story that are not just about \
to:
--- If you look at actual reviews and not just review scores, there are mostly negative reviews of the series that are not just about \\\"nostalgia blinded babies\\\". The common points of those legit reviews are \\\"bad animation, bad art, unfunny humor, disrespectful attitude towards the original\\\". These are major sources
2. The work has a small audience, and if it\\\'s produced for profit it has poor sales.
-- MEANING that it isn\\\'t disqualified just because it has fans. It can have fans and still qualify as this trope. And by any objective standpoint, clearly that fanbase was not strong enough to last them a season, as the series was cancelled after all.
3. The work has been panned by multiple critics for its low quality. The work\\\'s flaws may be parodied by a number of other works, and in some cases the work may even become a pop culture-level Snark Bait.
-- Again, see above point. It\\\'s not just about people who are just hating to be hated, there are legit reviews of the series out there. What seems to be more of a consistent issue isn\\\'t the hatedom, but a majority of journalists who hate the fans who hate the show and will not listen to what they have to say. Something I thoroughly expect here because of the wording of those fans. The fact that many spend more time talking about fans than the show itself is a concerning idea.
And I\\\'m gonna make it clear, I\\\'m not and have never been a fan of Thundercats of any incarnation, so I have no nostalgic feelings for it, but the facts are facts. This show was bad, didn\\\'t catch on with its target audience or older fans and has many aspects to it that are legitimately considered bad.
It is more than qualified for an entry on this trope. And if anything, the idea that \\\"it has fans, so it\\\'s not eligible\\\" needs to end because that\\\'s not what the rules say, as I just quoted. And in the future, let us be civil instead of resorting to the same buzzwords. Just pointing out that people use those buzzwords, then use similar buswords like asshurt or extreme hyperbole does not make you look any better.
2. The work has a small audience, and if it\\\'s produced for profit it has poor sales.
-- MEANING that it isn\\\'t disqualified just because it has fans. It can have fans and still qualify as this trope. And by any objective standpoint, clearly that fanbase was not strong enough to last them a season, as the series was cancelled after all.
3. The work has been panned by multiple critics for its low quality. The work\\\'s flaws may be parodied by a number of other works, and in some cases the work may even become a pop culture-level Snark Bait.
-- Again, see above point. It\\\'s not just about people who are just hating to be hated, there are legit reviews of the series out there. What seems to be more of a consistent issue isn\\\'t the hatedom, but a majority of journalists who hate the fans who hate the show and will not listen to what they have to say. Something I thoroughly expect here because of the wording of those fans. The fact that many spend more time talking about fans than the show itself is a concerning idea.
And I\\\'m gonna make it clear, I\\\'m not and have never been a fan of Thundercats of any incarnation, so I have no nostalgic feelings for it, but the facts are facts. This show was bad, didn\\\'t catch on with its target audience or older fans and has many aspects to it that are legitimately considered bad.
It is more than qualified for an entry on this trope. And if anything, the idea that \\\"it has fans, so it\\\'s not eligible\\\" needs to end because that\\\'s not what the rules say, as I just quoted. And in the future, let us be civil instead of resorting to the same buzzwords. Just pointing out that people use those buzzwords, then use similar buswords like asshurt or extreme hyperbole does not make you look any better.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
Rules
to:
Rules (Taken from the Main Page)
Changed line(s) 6 from:
n
--- If you look at actual reviews and not just review scores, there are mostly negative reviews of the story that are not just about \
to:
--- If you look at actual reviews and not just review scores, there are mostly negative reviews of the story that are not just about \\\"nostalgia blinded babies\\\". The common points of those legit reviews are \\\"bad animation, bad art, unfunny humor, disrespectful attitude towards the original\\\". These are major sources
2. The work has a small audience, and if it\\\'s produced for profit it has poor sales.
-- MEANING that it isn\\\'t disqualified just because it has fans. It can have fans and still qualify as this trope. And by any objective standpoint, clearly that fanbase was not strong enough to last them a season, as the series was cancelled after all.
3. The work has been panned by multiple critics for its low quality. The work\\\'s flaws may be parodied by a number of other works, and in some cases the work may even become a pop culture-level Snark Bait.
-- Again, see above point. It\\\'s not just about people who are just hating to be hated, there are legit reviews of the series out there. What seems to be more of a consistent issue isn\\\'t the hatedom, but a majority of journalists who hate the fans who hate the show and will not listen to what they have to say. Something I thoroughly expect here because of the wording of those fans. The fact that many spend more time talking about fans than the show itself is a concerning idea.
And I\\\'m gonna make it clear, I\\\'m not and have never been a fan of Thundercats of any incarnation, so I have no nostalgic feelings for it, but the facts are facts. This show was bad, didn\\\'t catch on with its target audience or older fans and has many aspects to it that are legitimately considered bad.
It is more than qualified for an entry on this trope. And if anything, the idea that \\\"it has fans, so it\\\'s not eligible\\\" needs to end because that\\\'s not what the rules say, as I just quoted. And in the future, let us be civil instead of resorting to the same buzzwords. Just pointing out that people use those buzzwords, then use similar buswords like asshurt or extreme hyperbole does not make you look any better.
2. The work has a small audience, and if it\\\'s produced for profit it has poor sales.
-- MEANING that it isn\\\'t disqualified just because it has fans. It can have fans and still qualify as this trope. And by any objective standpoint, clearly that fanbase was not strong enough to last them a season, as the series was cancelled after all.
3. The work has been panned by multiple critics for its low quality. The work\\\'s flaws may be parodied by a number of other works, and in some cases the work may even become a pop culture-level Snark Bait.
-- Again, see above point. It\\\'s not just about people who are just hating to be hated, there are legit reviews of the series out there. What seems to be more of a consistent issue isn\\\'t the hatedom, but a majority of journalists who hate the fans who hate the show and will not listen to what they have to say. Something I thoroughly expect here because of the wording of those fans. The fact that many spend more time talking about fans than the show itself is a concerning idea.
And I\\\'m gonna make it clear, I\\\'m not and have never been a fan of Thundercats of any incarnation, so I have no nostalgic feelings for it, but the facts are facts. This show was bad, didn\\\'t catch on with its target audience or older fans and has many aspects to it that are legitimately considered bad.
It is more than qualified for an entry on this trope. And if anything, the idea that \\\"it has fans, so it\\\'s not eligible\\\" needs to end because that\\\'s not what the rules say, as I just quoted. And in the future, let us be civil instead of resorting to the same buzzwords. Just pointing out that people use those buzzwords, then use similar buswords like asshurt or extreme hyperbole does not make you look any better.
