[009]
LionClaw85
Current Version
Changed line(s) 6 from:
n
Maybe I\'m getting the wrong message here despite the \
to:
Maybe I\\\'m getting the wrong message here despite the \\\"Tropes are not bad\\\" disclaimer(and I guess the \\\"Nothing wrong with fanservice\\\" line too) but a lot of these come off as malicious interpretations.
Should these tropes never be done in fiction? (specifically like the one I used as an example). Plus I feel it erases a lot of context in many of these tropes, either biological, cultural, etc. because there simply not being some even ratio.
Unintentionally or not, this is what I\\\'m getting from this.
I ask because I been reading TVtropes for years and this was the first time stumbling on, I guess, a \\\"divisive\\\" page like this. I can\\\'t imagine I\\\'m the only one with these questions.
(edited to be more clear)
Should these tropes never be done in fiction? (specifically like the one I used as an example). Plus I feel it erases a lot of context in many of these tropes, either biological, cultural, etc. because there simply not being some even ratio.
Unintentionally or not, this is what I\\\'m getting from this.
I ask because I been reading TVtropes for years and this was the first time stumbling on, I guess, a \\\"divisive\\\" page like this. I can\\\'t imagine I\\\'m the only one with these questions.
(edited to be more clear)
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Does this page imply theres automatically malicious if a work uses majority of these tropes? Like Super Mario Bros for instance: Are the games bigoted for Peach being a female Damsel? Is Miyamoto a bigot for writing it that way? Likewise, should we have no more dopey dad characters like Peter Griffin or Homer Simpson? Are those misandrist on men for implying they are stupid?
to:
Does this page imply theres automatically malicious intent if a work uses these tropes?
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
Maybe I\'m getting the wrong message here despite the \
to:
Like Super Mario Bros for instance: Are the games bigoted for Peach being a female Damsel? Is Miyamoto a bigot for writing it that way?
Likewise, should we have no more dopey dad characters like Peter Griffin or Homer Simpson? Are those misandrist on men for implying they are stupid?
Maybe I\\\'m getting the wrong message here despite the \\\"Tropes are not bad\\\" disclaimer(and I guess the \\\"Nothing wrong with fanservice\\\" line too) but a lot of these come off as malicious interpretations.
Should these tropes never be done in fiction? (specifically like the one I used as an example). Plus I feel it erases a lot of context in many of these tropes, either biological, cultural, etc. rather than simply not fitting some even ratio.
Unintentionally or not, this is what I\\\'m getting from this.
I ask because I been reading TVtropes for years and this was the first time stumbling on a, I guess, \\\"divisive\\\" page like this. I can\\\'t imagine I\\\'m the only one with these questions.
Likewise, should we have no more dopey dad characters like Peter Griffin or Homer Simpson? Are those misandrist on men for implying they are stupid?
Maybe I\\\'m getting the wrong message here despite the \\\"Tropes are not bad\\\" disclaimer(and I guess the \\\"Nothing wrong with fanservice\\\" line too) but a lot of these come off as malicious interpretations.
Should these tropes never be done in fiction? (specifically like the one I used as an example). Plus I feel it erases a lot of context in many of these tropes, either biological, cultural, etc. rather than simply not fitting some even ratio.
Unintentionally or not, this is what I\\\'m getting from this.
I ask because I been reading TVtropes for years and this was the first time stumbling on a, I guess, \\\"divisive\\\" page like this. I can\\\'t imagine I\\\'m the only one with these questions.
