[008]
DBZfan102
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
The name of the trope is really unindicative. The uninitiated would assume the person saying it is reacting to someone \'\'else\'s\'\' plans and gambits. Or just saying the {{StockPhrase|s}} itself. I feel like this trope should be renamed to UnforeseenVariable, or something to that effect.
to:
The name of the trope is really unindicative. The uninitiated would assume the person saying it is reacting to someone \\\'\\\'else\\\'s\\\'\\\' plans and gambits. Or just saying the {{Stock Phrase|s}} itself. I feel like this trope should be renamed to UnforeseenVariable, or something to that effect.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
The name of the trope is really unindicative. The uninitiated would assume the person saying it is reacting to someone \'\'else\'s\'\' plans and gambits. Hell, nothing in this trope requires someone to even say \
to:
The name of the trope is really unindicative. The uninitiated would assume the person saying it is reacting to someone \\\'\\\'else\\\'s\\\'\\\' plans and gambits. Or just saying the {{StockPhrase|s}} itself. I feel like this trope should be renamed to UnforeseenVariable, or something to that effect.
Seriously, though: What part of this trope\\\'s name indicates plans are involved at all?
Seriously, though: What part of this trope\\\'s name indicates plans are involved at all?
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
The name of the trope is really unindicative. The uninitiated would assume the person saying it is reacting to someone \'\'else\'s\'\' plans and gambits. Hell, nothing in this trope requires someone to even say [=\
to:
The name of the trope is really unindicative. The uninitiated would assume the person saying it is reacting to someone \\\'\\\'else\\\'s\\\'\\\' plans and gambits. Hell, nothing in this trope requires someone to even say \\\"Didn\\\'t see that coming\\\", even though it\\\'s a stock phrase. I feel like this trope should be renamed to UnforeseenVariable, or something, and then Didn\\\'t see that coming could be a separate trope for actual uses of the phrase.
Seriously, though: What part of this trope\\\'s name indicates plans are involved at all?
Seriously, though: What part of this trope\\\'s name indicates plans are involved at all?
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
The name of the trope is really unindicative. The uninitiated would assume the person saying it is reacting to someone \'\'else\'s\'\' plans and gambits. Hell, nothing in this trope requires someone to even say \
to:
The name of the trope is really unindicative. The uninitiated would assume the person saying it is reacting to someone \\\'\\\'else\\\'s\\\'\\\' plans and gambits. Hell, nothing in this trope requires someone to even say [=\\\"=]Didn\\\'t see that coming\\\", even though it\\\'s a stock phrase. I feel like this trope should be renamed to UnforeseenVariable, or something, and then Didn\\\'t see that coming could be a separate trope for actual uses of the phrase.
Seriously, though: What part of this trope\\\'s name indicates plans are involved at all?
Seriously, though: What part of this trope\\\'s name indicates plans are involved at all?
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
The name of the trope is really unindicative. The uninitiated would assume the person saying it is reacting to someone \'\'else\'s\'\' plans and gambits. Hell, nothing in this trope requires someone to even say \
to:
The name of the trope is really unindicative. The uninitiated would assume the person saying it is reacting to someone \\\'\\\'else\\\'s\\\'\\\' plans and gambits. Hell, nothing in this trope requires someone to even say \\\"Didn\\\'t see that coming\\\", even though it\\\'s a stock phrase. I feel like this trope should be renamed to UnforeseenVariable, or something, and then Didn\\\'t see that coming could be a separate trope for actual uses of the phrase.
Seriously, though: What part of this trope\\\'s name indicates plans are involved at all?
Seriously, though: What part of this trope\\\'s name indicates plans are involved at all?
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
The name of the trope is really unindicative. The uninitiated would assume the person saying it is reacting to someone \'\'else\'s\'\' plans and gambits. Hell, nothing in this trope requires someone to even say \
to:
The name of the trope is really unindicative. The uninitiated would assume the person saying it is reacting to someone \\\'\\\'else\\\'s\\\'\\\' plans and gambits. Hell, nothing in this trope requires someone to even say \\\"Didn\\\'t see that coming\\\", even though it\\\'s a stock phrase. I feel like this trope should be renamed to UnforeseenVariable, or something, and then Didn\\\'t see that coming could be a separate trope for actual uses of the phrase.
Seriously, though: What part of this trope\\\'s name indicates plans are involved at all?
Seriously, though: What part of this trope\\\'s name indicates plans are involved at all?
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
The name of the trope is really unindicative. The uninitiated would assume the person saying it is reacting to someone \'\'else\'s\'\' plans and gambits. Hell, nothing in this trope requires someone to even say \
to:
The name of the trope is really unindicative. The uninitiated would assume the person saying it is reacting to someone \\\'\\\'else\\\'s\\\'\\\' plans and gambits. Hell, nothing in this trope requires someone to even say \\\"Didn\\\'t see that coming\\\", even though it\\\'s a stock phrase. I feel like this trope should be renamed to UnforeseenVariable, or something, and then Didn\\\'t see that coming could be a separate trope for actual uses of the phrase.
Seriously, though: What part of this trope\\\'s name indicates plans are involved at all?
Seriously, though: What part of this trope\\\'s name indicates plans are involved at all?
Changed line(s) 1 from:
to:
A problem with my requirement is how do we consider Cecille. She is red to complement Roderick\\\'s green. The two can support each other and do have a RedOniBlueOni dynamic. Both join roughly at the same time.
